20.500.12556/DKUM-97955 Uporaba prisilnih sredstev za ustavljanje prevoznih sredstev primerjava Slovenije in Avstrije The use of coercive means to stop vehicles: a comparison between Slovenia and Austria diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo V diplomskem delu smo preučili uporabi prisilnih sredstev za ustavljanje prevoznih sredstev s poudarkom na primerjavi med Slovenijo in Avstrijo. Analiziran je bil normativni okvir, kateri ureja uporabo navedenih prisilnih sredstev ter njihova uporaba z vidika zakonitosti, sorazmernosti in strokovnosti. Prav tako je bilo opisano varnostno tveganje, katero nastaja pri ustavljanju vozil in pri policijskem zasledovanju, saj gre za eno izmed zahtevnejših in varnostno ogroženih oblik policijskega dela. Na podlagi analize je bilo ugotovljeno, da je uporaba prisilnih sredstev v obeh državah pravno urejena ter omejena z načeli zakonitosti, nujnosti in sorazmernosti. Pri tem slovenska zakonodaja natančneje določa vrste prisilnih sredstev in pogoje njihove uporabe, kar zagotavlja večjo pravno določnost in preglednost, medtem ko je avstrijska ureditev bolj splošna in temelji na širših pravnih načelih, kar omogoča večjo fleksibilnost pri izbiri ukrepov. Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da se prisilna sredstva v praksi uporabljajo relativno redko in predstavljajo skrajni ukrep, ki se uporabi šele, ko milejši ukrepi niso učinkoviti. Poleg tega nobeno prisilno sredstvo ne zagotavlja popolnoma varnega izida, kar še dodatno poudarja pomen strokovne presoje in ustreznega usposabljanja policistov. Primerjava je pokazala, da slovenski sistem omogoča večjo pravno predvidljivost in nadzor nad uporabo prisilnih sredstev, medtem ko avstrijski sistem omogoča večjo operativno prilagodljivost. Ugotovitve prispevajo k boljšemu razumevanju uporabe prisilnih sredstev ter k izboljšanju učinkovitosti in varnosti policijskega delovanja. In our diploma thesis, the use of coercive means for stopping vehicles was examined, with a focus on a comparison between Slovenia and Austria. The normative framework governing the use of these measures was analyzed, as well as their application from the perspective of legality, proportionality, and professionalism. The safety risks arising during vehicle stops and police pursuits were also described, as these represent one of the more demanding and high-risk forms of police work. Based on the analysis, it was established that the use of coercive means in both countries is legally regulated and limited by the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality. In this regard, Slovenian legislation more precisely defines the types of coercive means and the conditions for their use, ensuring a higher level of legal certainty and transparency, whereas the Austrian system is more general and based on broader legal principles, allowing greater flexibility in the selection of measures. It was also found that coercive means are used relatively rarely in practice and represent a measure of last resort, applied only when less intrusive measures are ineffective. Furthermore, no coercive measure guarantees a completely safe outcome, which emphasizes the importance of professional judgment and adequate police training. The comparison showed that the Slovenian system provides greater legal predictability and control over the use of coercive means, while the Austrian system allows for greater operational flexibility. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the use of coercive means and to improving the effectiveness and safety of police work.   policijsko zasledovanje prisilna sredstva ustavljanje prevoznih sredstev Slovenija Avstrija primerjava diplomske naloge coercive means vehicle stopping procedures police powers police pursuits true true false B. Tomšič Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2026-05-04 20:05:35 2026-07-07 13:07:07 2026-07-08 03:11:16 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2026 0 Ljubljana 2026 Ljubljana VIII f., 76 str. 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 351.741:351.81(043.2) 283919363 VS_Tomsic_Bor_2026.pdf VS_Tomsic_Bor_2026.pdf 1 B914EEC3172F1726991724B302FCEBCE 956c81b63c03b403563b3ca3c1a425edc43287e36d98e336fb668cdec0017414 8cc45b9d-6ff7-11f1-868d-00155d580e34 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=207561 Fakulteta za varnostne vede 0 0 0