| | SLO | ENG | Piškotki in zasebnost

Večja pisava | Manjša pisava

Izpis gradiva Pomoč

Naslov:POTENTIAL INDICATORS FOR Sustainability assessment of food production on the field level
Avtorji:ID Štraus, Saša (Avtor)
ID Bavec, Martina (Mentor) Več o mentorju... Novo okno
ID Bavec, Ftranc (Komentor)
ID Rozman, Črtomir (Komentor)
Datoteke:.pdf DR_Straus_Sasa_2012.pdf (1,79 MB)
MD5: 2F022729ADF2FB819746C78CDA9F1386
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/aab5e337-ac91-49b4-83d3-62e85b61c0af
 
Jezik:Angleški jezik
Vrsta gradiva:Doktorska disertacija
Organizacija:FKBV - Fakulteta za kmetijstvo in biosistemske vede
Opis:The issue of sustainable agriculture has attracted considerable attention. Sustainable agriculture encompasses economic viability, social acceptance, conservation of the environment, and food quality. The present thesis aims to evaluate the sustainability of conventional (CON), integrated (INT), and organic (ORG) production systems (PS). The assessment of sustainability of different PS was made in terms of the four most significant aspects of sustainability—agronomic, economic, environmental, and food quality—at the field level (i). Agronomic parameters such as the number of leaves, leaf area index, fruit characteristics, and seed/oil yield and economic feasibility were evaluated for oil seed pumpkin (ii). The environmental sustainability was assessed through the ecological footprint and weed biodiversity index (iii). The study of food quality determined the internal quality (total phenol, sugar, organic acid, vitamin C, mineral, and nitrate content and antioxidant activity) and sensory evaluation (iv, v). The sustainability of the PS for the four crops was assessed using a qualitative multi-attribute model (DEXi methodology (vi). Because field trial was conducted in protected landscapes (PL), the options for the development of PLs with the ORG PS were evaluated. To obtain the data, a field trial was conducted on a 4000 m2 area in the years 2008 to 2011. Wheat, oil seed pumpkin, red beet, and cabbage grown by the three different PSs—CON, INT, and ORG—and a control plot were studied. They were arranged in a randomized complete block split-plot design with four replications. The production systems differed in plant protection and fertilization strategies, as defined by legislation and standards. Survey of literature point out that indicator are the basis of assessing sustainability, the assessment of sustainability should encompass at least three pillars of sustainability (i). Agronomic parameters (ii) and economic feasibility were evaluated for oil seed pumpkin in the field trial. The leaf area index differed significantly between CON (4.8 for CON and 4.1 for ORG) and other production systems at later growth stages (BBCH = 600-700), and it was highly correlated with the yield (808 kg ha-1 for CON and 723 kg ha-1 for ORG). The yield and all agronomic parameters were significantly lower in ORG; however, the economic feasibility analysis showed that the financial results could be higher because of lower production costs (1.784 € ha-1 for CON and 1.434.5 € ha-1 for ORG) and higher product prices. The same economic feasibility analysis results were also obtained for cabbage and red beet (iii). The Biodiversity Ecological Footprint index (iii) were interpreted using the SPIonExcel tool and the Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index for the weeds species diversity. The ecological footprint of ORG was 3.3 times lower than that of CON (21 ha to 70 ha), and the Shannon-Weaver diversity index of ORG was significantly higher than that of CON (which was 20% higher, 0.66 for CON and 0.86 for ORG). The internal quality were studied for red beet and white cabbage. Sensory evaluation of sauerkraut samples was made. In the case of red beet, the differences were significant for vitamin C (23.3% higher for ORG than for CON), antioxidant activity (30.3% higher for ORG than for CON), and some microminerals (Na, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn) (iv). In the case of cabbage, a significantly lower amount of P and N and a significantly higher amount of Na, Mg, and total phenols (in ORG 0.360 GAE mg g-1 FW and in CON 0.310 GAE mg g-1 FW) was found for ORG than for CON cabbage. The concentration of nitrates is significantly lower in ORG (530 mg kg-1 for CON and 370.37 mg kg-1 for ORG). The sensory evaluation of sauerkraut samples was performed by 100 consumers using a nine-point hedonic scale. The ORG and control samples were evaluated significantly better than the INT and CON samples (overall acceptability was 5.94 for ORG and 5.34 for CON) (v). The core of the qualitative multi-model (DEXi methodology) is a hierarchical tree that divides
Ključne besede:Sustainable agriculture, agronomic parameters, environmental parameters, economic feasibility, food quality, DEX, protected landscapes
Kraj izida:Maribor
Leto izida:2012
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-38990 Novo okno
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:PX1SCZWS
Datum objave v DKUM:29.11.2012
Število ogledov:3197
Število prenosov:340
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Področja:FKBV
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Skupna ocena:(0 glasov)
Vaša ocena:Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom.
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share



Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Naslov:Potencialni indikatorji za ocenjevanje trajnosti v pridelavi hrane na njivah
Opis:Cilji trajnostnega kmetijstva so ekonomska upravičenost, socialna sprejemljivost, ohranjanje okolja in kakovost hrane. Namen disertacije je ocenjevanje trajnosti pridelovalnih sistemov, in sicer konvencionalnega (KON), integriranega (INT) in ekološkega (EKO) pridelovalnega sistema (PS). Ocenjevanje trajnosti PS je temeljilo na štirih najpomembnejših vidikih trajnosti – agronomski, ekonomski in okoljski vidik ter vidik kakovosti hrane – na ravni njive (i). Agronomski parametri kot so število listov, indeks listne površine, lastnosti plodov, pridelek semena in olja in ekonomska upravičenost so bili ovrednoteni za oljne buče (ii). Okoljska trajnost je bila ocenjena skozi okoljski odtis in indeks diverzitete plevelnih vrst (iii). Kakovost hrane je zajemala proučitev notranje kakovosti (skupni fenoli, sladkor, organske kisline, vitamin C, vsebnost mineralov in nitratov ter antioksidativno aktivnost) in senzorično ocenjevanje (iv, v). Trajnost PS za štiri posevke je bila ocenjena z uporabo kvalitativnega multi-atributivnega modela (DEXi metodologija) (vi). Zaradi lokacije poljskega poskusa na zavarovanem območju (ZO) je bila proučevana možnost razvoja ZO z EKO PS. Za zagotovitev podatkov je bil vzpostavljen poljski poskus v skupni velikosti 4000 m2 v letih 2008 do 2011. Pšenica, oljne buče, rdeča pesa in zelje so bili pridelovani v treh različnih PS – KON, INT, EKO – in kontrolne parcelice. Poskus je bil vzpostavljen kot naključni blok sistem v štirih ponovitvah. PS so se razlikovali v strategijah gnojenja in varstva rastlin, kot je definirano v zakonodaji in standardih. Osnovna obdelava tal, setev in datumi ter metode žetve oziroma spravila so bile enake za vse parcelice. Pregled literature je pokazal, da so indikatorji osnova za ocenjevanje trajnosti. Ocenjevanje bi naj zajelo vsaj tri vidike trajnosti; ogrodja bi naj bila dovolj široka v času in prostoru, prenosljiva, upoštevajoča lokalne in globalne vplive ter primarno namenjena odločevalcem (i). Agronomski parametri (ii) ter ekonomska upravičenost pridelave so bili ovrednotene za oljne buče v poljskem poskusu. Indeks listne površine se je signifikantno razlikoval med KON (4,8 za KON in 4,1 za EKO) in drugimi PS pri poznejših fazah rasti (BBCH=600-700), in je bil visoko povezan s pridelkom (808 kg ha-1 za KON in 723 kg ha-1 za EKO). Pridelek in ostali agronomski parametri so bili signifikantno nižji v EKO, vendar pa je ekonomska upravičenost pokazala, da je finančni rezultat lahko višji v EKO zaradi nižjih proizvodnih stroškov (1.784 € ha-1 za KON in 1.434,5 € ha-1 za EKO) in višje odkupne cene. Enake rezultate je pokazala analiza ekonomske upravičenosti za rdečo peso in zelje (iii). Združen indeks biodiverzitete in okoljskega odtisa (iii) je bil interpretiran z uporabo orodja SPIonExcel in Shannon-Weaverjevega diverzitetnega indeksa za diverziteto plevelnih vrst. Okoljski odtis v EKO je bil 3,3 krat nižji kot v KON (21 ha proti 70 ha). Shannon-Weaver diverzitetni indeks je bil v ORG signifikantno višji kot v KON (20% višji, 0,66 za KON in 0,86 za EKO). Notranja kakovost so bile proučevane za zelje in rdečo peso. Senzorično ocenjevanje je bilo opravljeno za vzorce kislega zelja. V primeru rdeče pese (iv) so bile razlike signifikantne za vitamin C (23,3% višje vrednosti za EKO kot za KON), antioksidativno aktivnost (30,3% višje vrednosti za EKO kot za KON), in nekatere mikrominerale (Na, Cu, Fe, Mn in Zn). V primeru zelja je bila v EKO signifikantno nižja vsebnost fosforja in dušika in signifikantno višja vsebnost natrija, magnezija in skupnih fenolov (0,360 v EKO in 0,310 GAE mg g-1 FW v KON) kot v KON. Koncentracija nitratov je bila v EKO signifikantno nižja kot v KON (530 za KON in 370,37 mg kg-1 za EKO). Senzorično ocenjevanje vzorcev kislega zelja je opravilo 100 potrošnikov z uporabo 9- stopenjske hedonske lestvice. Vzorci ORG in kontrolnega obravnavanja so bile signifikantno bolje ocenjeni kot INT in KON vzorci (splošna sprejemljivost v EKO 5,94 in 5,34 v KON) (v). Ogrodje kvalitativ
Ključne besede:Trajnostno kmetijstvo, agronomski parametri, okoljski parametri, ekonomska upravičenost, kakovost hrane, DEX, zavarovana območja


Komentarji

Dodaj komentar

Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti.

Komentarji (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
Ni komentarjev!

Nazaj
Logotipi partnerjev Univerza v Mariboru Univerza v Ljubljani Univerza na Primorskem Univerza v Novi Gorici