| | SLO | ENG | Piškotki in zasebnost

Večja pisava | Manjša pisava

Izpis gradiva Pomoč

Naslov:Spatial clusters of Varroa destructor control strategies in Europe
Avtorji:ID Brodschneider, Robert (Avtor)
ID Schlagbauer, Johannes (Avtor)
ID Arakelyan, Iliyana (Avtor)
ID Gregorc, Aleš (Avtor)
Datoteke:.pdf Spatial_clusters_of_Varroa-Brodschneider-2022.pdf (2,17 MB)
MD5: CFB41E06C66F75823DC0AAB3003F6779
 
URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10340-022-01523-2
 
Jezik:Angleški jezik
Vrsta gradiva:Znanstveno delo
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FKBV - Fakulteta za kmetijstvo in biosistemske vede
Opis:Beekeepers have various options to control the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bee colonies, but no empirical data are available on the methods they apply in practice. We surveyed 28,409 beekeepers maintaining 507,641 colonies in 30 European countries concerning Varroa control methods. The set of 19 different Varroa diagnosis and control measures was taken from the annual COLOSS questionnaire on honey bee colony losses. The most frequent activities were monitoring of Varroa infestations, drone brood removal, various oxalic acid applications and formic acid applications. Correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering on principal components showed that six Varroa control options (not necessarily the most used ones) significantly contribute to defining three distinctive clusters of countries in terms of Varroa control in Europe. Cluster I (eight Western European countries) is characterized by use of amitraz strips. Cluster II comprises 15 countries from Scandinavia, the Baltics, and Central-Southern Europe. This cluster is characterized by long-term formic acid treatments. Cluster III is characterized by dominant usage of amitraz fumigation and formed by seven Eastern European countries. The median number of different treatments applied per beekeeper was lowest in cluster III. Based on estimation of colony numbers in included countries, we extrapolated the proportions of colonies treated with different methods in Europe. This suggests that circa 62% of colonies in Europe are treated with amitraz, followed by oxalic acid for the next largest percentage of colonies. We discuss possible factors determining the choice of Varroa control measures in the different clusters.
Ključne besede:Apis mellifera, COLOSS, beekeeping, acaricide, varroa control, survey results
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Verzija publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Datum objave:01.01.2022
Leto izida:2022
Št. strani:str. 1-11
Številčenje:Letn. 95
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-85115 Novo okno
UDK:638.1
COBISS.SI-ID:116775171 Novo okno
DOI:10.1007/s10340-022-01523-2 Novo okno
ISSN pri članku:1612-4758
Datum objave v DKUM:18.08.2023
Število ogledov:994
Število prenosov:47
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Področja:Ostalo
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Skupna ocena:(0 glasov)
Vaša ocena:Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom.
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share



Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Journal of pest science
Založnik:Springer
ISSN:1612-4758
COBISS.SI-ID:1202342 Novo okno

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:Apis mellifera, COLOSS, čebelarstvo, akaricid, nadzor nad varojami, rezultati raziskav


Komentarji

Dodaj komentar

Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti.

Komentarji (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
Ni komentarjev!

Nazaj
Logotipi partnerjev Univerza v Mariboru Univerza v Ljubljani Univerza na Primorskem Univerza v Novi Gorici