| | SLO | ENG | Piškotki in zasebnost

Večja pisava | Manjša pisava

Izpis gradiva Pomoč

Naslov:The gap between the admitted and the measured technical debt: an empirical study
Avtorji:ID Pavlič, Luka (Avtor)
ID Hliš, Tilen (Avtor)
ID Heričko, Marjan (Avtor)
ID Beranič, Tina (Avtor)
Datoteke:.pdf applsci-12-07482-v2.pdf (569,03 KB)
MD5: 1FB2A2B9A4B46092F382B2AA876EB64E
 
URL https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/15/7482
 
Jezik:Angleški jezik
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FERI - Fakulteta za elektrotehniko, računalništvo in informatiko
Opis:: Technical debt is a well understood and used concept in IT development. The metaphor, rooted in the financial world, captures the amount of work that development teams owe to a product. Every time developers take a shortcut within development, the technical debt accumulates. Technical debt identification can be accomplished via manual reporting on the technical debt items, which is called self-admitted technical debt. Several specialised methods and tools have also emerged that promise to measure the technical debt. Based on experience in the community, the impression emerged that the measured technical debt is of a significantly different amount than the self-admitted debt. In this context, we decided to perform empirical research on the possible gap between the two. We investigated 14 production-grade software products while determining the amount of accumulated technical debt via (a) a self-admitting procedure and (b) measuring the debt. The outcomes show clearly the significant difference in the technical debt reported by the two methods. We urge development and quality-assurance teams not to rely on technical debt measurement alone. The tools demonstrated their strength in identifying low-level code technical debt items that violate a set of predefined rules. However, developers should have additional insight into violations, based on the interconnected source code and its relation to the domain and higher-level design decisions.
Ključne besede:technical debt identification, self-admitted technical debt, technical debt measurement, difference comparison
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Verzija publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Poslano v recenzijo:23.05.2022
Datum sprejetja članka:23.07.2022
Datum objave:26.07.2022
Založnik:MDPI AG
Leto izida:2022
Št. strani:21 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 12, iss. 15
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-92292 Novo okno
UDK:659.2
COBISS.SI-ID:117810435 Novo okno
DOI:10.3390/app12157482 Novo okno
ISSN pri članku:2076-3417
Avtorske pravice:© 2022 by the authors
Datum objave v DKUM:27.03.2025
Število ogledov:209
Število prenosov:13
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Področja:Ostalo
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Skupna ocena:(0 glasov)
Vaša ocena:Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom.
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share



Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Applied sciences
Skrajšan naslov:Appl. sci.
Založnik:MDPI
ISSN:2076-3417
COBISS.SI-ID:522979353 Novo okno

Gradivo je financirano iz projekta

Financer:ARIS - Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P2-0057-2018
Naslov:Informacijski sistemi

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:identifikacija, različne primerjave


Komentarji

Dodaj komentar

Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti.

Komentarji (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
Ni komentarjev!

Nazaj
Logotipi partnerjev Univerza v Mariboru Univerza v Ljubljani Univerza na Primorskem Univerza v Novi Gorici