| | SLO | ENG | Piškotki in zasebnost

Večja pisava | Manjša pisava

Izpis gradiva Pomoč

Naslov:PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: a novel approach using artificial intelligence automation
Avtorji:ID Gosak, Lucija (Avtor)
ID Štiglic, Gregor (Avtor)
ID Pruinelli, Lisiane (Avtor)
ID Vrbnjak, Dominika (Avtor)
Datoteke:.pdf J_of_Nursing_Scholarship_-_2024_-_Gosak_-_PICOT_questions_and_search_strategies_formulation__A_novel_approach_using.pdf (527,46 KB)
MD5: 8CAAD71B117D326B198DB5D794A9709A
 
URL https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.13036
 
Jezik:Angleški jezik
Vrsta gradiva:Znanstveno delo
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FZV - Fakulteta za zdravstvene vede
FERI - Fakulteta za elektrotehniko, računalništvo in informatiko
Opis:Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare artificial intelligence (AI)-based large language models (LLMs) (ChatGPT-3.5, Bing, and Bard) with human-based formulations in generating relevant clinical queries, using comprehensive methodological evaluations. Methods To interact with the major LLMs ChatGPT-3.5, Bing Chat, and Google Bard, scripts and prompts were designed to formulate PICOT (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, time) clinical questions and search strategies. Quality of the LLMs responses was assessed using a descriptive approach and independent assessment by two researchers. To determine the number of hits, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL Ultimate search results were imported separately, without search restrictions, with the search strings generated by the three LLMs and an additional one by the expert. Hits from one of the scenarios were also exported for relevance evaluation. The use of a single scenario was chosen to provide a focused analysis. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were also calculated. Results In five different scenarios, ChatGPT-3.5 generated 11,859 hits, Bing 1,376,854, Bard 16,583, and an expert 5919 hits. We then used the first scenario to assess the relevance of the obtained results. The human expert search approach resulted in 65.22% (56/105) relevant articles. Bing was the most accurate AI-based LLM with 70.79% (63/89), followed by ChatGPT-3.5 with 21.05% (12/45), and Bard with 13.29% (42/316) relevant hits. Based on the assessment of two evaluators, ChatGPT-3.5 received the highest score (M = 48.50; SD = 0.71). Results showed a high level of agreement between the two evaluators. Although ChatGPT-3.5 showed a lower percentage of relevant hits compared to Bing, this reflects the nuanced evaluation criteria, where the subjective evaluation prioritized contextual accuracy and quality over mere relevance. Conclusion This study provides valuable insights into the ability of LLMs to formulate PICOT clinical questions and search strategies. AI-based LLMs, such as ChatGPT-3.5, demonstrate significant potential for augmenting clinical workflows, improving clinical query development, and supporting search strategies. However, the findings also highlight limitations that necessitate further refinement and continued human oversight. Clinical Relevance AI could assist nurses in formulating PICOT clinical questions and search strategies. AI-based LLMs offer valuable support to healthcare professionals by improving the structure of clinical questions and enhancing search strategies, thereby significantly increasing the efficiency of information retrieval.
Ključne besede:PICOT question, search strategies, artificial intelligence
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Verzija publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Poslano v recenzijo:31.01.2024
Datum sprejetja članka:07.11.2024
Datum objave:27.01.2025
Leto izida:2025
Št. strani:str. 5-16
Številčenje:Letn. 57, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-93712 Novo okno
UDK:616-083:004.8
COBISS.SI-ID:222504195 Novo okno
DOI:10.1111/jnu.13036 Novo okno
ISSN pri članku:1547-5069
Avtorske pravice:© 2024 The Author(s)
Datum objave v DKUM:21.07.2025
Število ogledov:231
Število prenosov:11
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Področja:Ostalo
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Skupna ocena:(0 glasov)
Vaša ocena:Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom.
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share



Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Journal of nursing scholarship
Založnik:Sigma Theta Tau International
ISSN:1547-5069
COBISS.SI-ID:517767705 Novo okno

Gradivo je financirano iz projekta

Financer:ARIS - Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:GC-0001-2024
Naslov:Umetna inteligenca za znanost

Financer:ARIS - Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:GC-0001
Naslov:Artificial Intelligence for Science

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:PICOT vprašanje, iskalne strategije, umetna inteligenca


Komentarji

Dodaj komentar

Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti.

Komentarji (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
Ni komentarjev!

Nazaj
Logotipi partnerjev Univerza v Mariboru Univerza v Ljubljani Univerza na Primorskem Univerza v Novi Gorici