| Naslov: | How multicriteria environmental assessment alters sustainability rankings : case study of hempcrete and prefabricated walls |
|---|
| Avtorji: | ID Ošlovnik, Tinkara (Avtor)
ID Denac, Matjaž (Avtor) |
|---|
| Datoteke: |  https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7032
 RAZ_Oslovnik_Tinkara_2025.pdf (1,27 MB)
MD5: 08DA3676769D9B5EEB6C187B3D404D54
|
|---|
| Jezik: | Angleški jezik |
|---|
| Vrsta gradiva: | Znanstveno delo |
|---|
| Tipologija: | 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek |
|---|
| Organizacija: | EPF - Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta
|
|---|
| Opis: | The construction sector emphasises circular economy principles that prioritise eco-design strategies, particularly the usage of secondary raw materials. The growing interest in using industrial hemp as a sustainable building material in the construction sector is driven by its versatility. Industrial hemp has been preferential in comparison to other traditional building materials due to its lower global warming impact. Claims regarding the environmental benefits of hemp-containing construction materials based on the single impact category could be misleading; therefore, life cycle assessment (LCA) studies including multiple environmental indicators should be implemented. This study aims to compare two alternative wall designs regarding their environmental impacts. The comparative LCA study for hempcrete and prefabricated walls used in residential buildings was assessed using IPCC and ReCiPe life cycle impact assessment methods. The study highlighted a significant discrepancy depending on the number of environmental indicators considered, as well as between characterised and weighted LCA results. A hempcrete wall was recognised as a slightly (13.63%) better alternative when assessed by the single-issue IPCC method, while its total burden assessed by the ReCiPe method was recognised to be significantly (2.78 times) higher. Based on the results from this case study, regulators could re-evaluate the appropriateness of reporting LCA results solely on the midpoint level, particularly when limited to a single impact indicator, while producers in the construction sector should recognise the threat of greenwashing when reporting using a single impact indicator only. |
|---|
| Ključne besede: | sustainable materials, lifecycle assessment, hempcrete, prefabrication, case study |
|---|
| Verzija publikacije: | Objavljena publikacija |
|---|
| Datum sprejetja članka: | 30.07.2025 |
|---|
| Datum objave: | 02.08.2025 |
|---|
| Leto izida: | 2025 |
|---|
| Št. strani: | str. 1-22 |
|---|
| Številčenje: | Vol. 17, issue 15, spec. iss., [art. no.] 7032 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-95531  |
|---|
| UDK: | 504.06 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 250120195 |
|---|
| DOI: | 10.3390/su17157032 |
|---|
| ISSN pri članku: | 2071-1050 |
|---|
| Datum objave v DKUM: | 24.09.2025 |
|---|
| Število ogledov: | 144 |
|---|
| Število prenosov: | 11 |
|---|
| Metapodatki: |    |
|---|
| Področja: | Ostalo
|
|---|
|
:
|
Kopiraj citat |
|---|
| | | | Skupna ocena: | (0 glasov) |
|---|
| Vaša ocena: | Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom. |
|---|
| Objavi na: |  |
|---|
Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše
podrobnosti ali sproži prenos. |
