| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:SPODBUDE IN ZAVORE PRI UČENJU
Authors:ID Fink, Kristina (Author)
ID Mayer, Janez (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Fink_Kristina_2009.pdf (1,93 MB)
MD5: 4AB159318AC73F4308494DBD06225DAB
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/edb4c3bf-936d-4b52-8ca0-156f8287d47e
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
Abstract:Diplomsko delo je analiza spodbud in zavor pri učenju. Zanimalo nas je, katere so glavne spodbude in zavore pri učenju. V diplomskem delu smo podrobno raziskali, kaj so učenje, motivacija in motivacija za učenje. Da bi ugotovili, katere so spodbude in zavore, ki vplivajo na učenje dijakov, smo izvedli raziskavo na dveh srednjih šolah in rezultate nato primerjali med seboj. V raziskavo smo vključili dijake Srednje zdravstvene šole Ljubljana (SZŠ) in dijake Tehniškega šolskega centra Kranj (TŠC). Spraševali smo jih o tem, kaj jih najbolj motivira za učenje, kaj jih pri učenju zavira, kakšna je njihova samopodoba v povezavi z motivacijo za učenje, kakšen vpliv ima profesorjevo podajanje snovi na motivacjo za učenje, kakšne so njihove učne navade in kako se starši zanimajo za njihovo učenje. Ugotovili smo, da dijake na obeh srednjih šolah za učenje spodbujajo in zavirajo podobni dejavniki. Rezultati raziskave so pokazali, da je največja spodbuda za učenje ta, da se zavedajo pomembnosti izobrazbe v življenju, največja zavora pa je nezanimiva učna snov. Na podlagi analize smo tudi ugotovili, da med mnenji dijakov SZŠ in TŠC ne obstajajo bistvene razlike o tem, kakšna je njihova samopodoba, kako se starši zanimajo za njihovo učenje in kakšne so njihove učne navade. Ugotovili smo tudi, da dijaki SZŠ načinu posredovanja znanja in odnosu profesorja do dijakov pripisujejo večji pomen kot dijaki TŠC.
Keywords:- dijaki - spodbude - zavore - samopodoba - učenje - starši - učitelji
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2009
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-11588 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:6511123 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:LODPFCTQ
Publication date in DKUM:28.09.2009
Views:3846
Downloads:299
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FOV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:INCENTIVES AND DISINCENTIVES FOR LEARNING
Abstract:In this paper, we describe our analysis of various stimulants and discouragements to motivation for studying. More precisely, we are interested as to which stimulations and discouragements have the greatest impact on motivation. During our study, we analyzed if similar factors existed for increasing and decreasing motivation levels between students at the Secondary Medical School of Ljubljana (SZŠ) and students at the Technical School Center of Kranj (TŠC). In diploma we researched in detail what are learning, motivation and motivation for learning. In determining which stimulants and discouragements influence students’ motivation for studying, our research included observing and analyzing a group of students from the Secondary Medical School of Ljubljana and a group of students from the Technical School Center of Kranj. We asked the two groups questions regarding greatest factors that motivate or hinder their studies, their self-esteem, suggestions for how teachers could better motivate them for learning the material, their study habits, and their parents’ interest in their studies. As a result, we determined that the two groups of students are motivated and unmotivated by similar factors. For students at both schools the biggest factor for increasing motivation is awareness of the importance of an education and the biggest factor for decreasing motivation is uninteresting learning materials. Based on the analysis we discovered that there are no important statistical differences based on students’ self-esteem, their parents’ interests and their learning habits. We also found out that students from SZŠ value their teachers communicating and learning knowledge more than students from TŠC and that there are important statistical differences in that matter.
Keywords:- student - incentives for learning - disincentives for learning - self-esteem - learning - parents - teachers


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica