| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:SPREMEMBE PRI POROČANJU PO ODSEKIH PO MSRP 8 V PRIMERJAVI Z NJEGOVIM PREDHODNIKOM MRS 14
Authors:ID Vrčkovnik, Matej (Author)
ID Korošec, Bojana (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Vrckovnik_Matej_2009.pdf (437,82 KB)
MD5: 810E55BE1B8D3E14EDC3868C99DB4FF4
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/766e2b15-fa3e-41ff-81ed-6f309cde6698
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:S 1. 1. 2009 morajo podjetja, ki poročajo po MSRP, razkrivati informacije po odsekih po MSRP 8, ki je nadomestil MRS 14. MSRP 8 je standard, ki je skoraj kopija ameriškega standarda SFAS 131. Njegovo sprejetje je predvsem posledica zbliževanja MSRP in US GAAP. Z MSRP 8 se bistveno spremeni opredeljevanje odsekov. Medtem ko so bili pri MRS 14 odseki opredeljeni kot področni in območni, so pri MSRP 8 odseki, o katerih se poroča, opredeljeni na osnovi informacij, ki jih vodilna oseba za sprejemanje poslovnih odločitev (CODM) uporablja za sprejemanje odločitev glede poslovanja podjetja. V teoretičnem delu smo predstavili standard poročanje po poslovnih odsekih (MSRP 8) in standard poročanje po odsekih (MRS 14) in ju primerjali med seboj. Proučevali smo tudi vplive in spremembe ob prehodu z MRS 14 na MSRP 8 z vidika poročevalcev in z vidika uporabnikov računovodskih informacij. Ugotovili smo, da so pripravljavci računovodskih informacij v letnih poročilih dokaj dobro sprejeli standard, medtem ko so uporabniki informacij do novega standarda dokaj zadržani. Kot slabost MSRP 8 so največkrat omenili neobvezno poročanje po območnih odsekih in zmanjšanje primerljivosti zaradi izvzetega kriterija tveganj in nagrad, ki ga prinaša poslovodski pristop. V avtomobilski industriji podjetja, ne glede na standard poročanja, razkrivajo skorajda istovrstne informacije. Razlike nastajajo pri številu odsekov in številu razkritih postavk, kar pa glede na ugotovitve naše raziskave ni pogojeno, po katerem standardu podjetje poroča. S tem smo zavrgli trditve, da imajo informacije, razkrite po MSRP 8, za zunanje uporabnike večjo dodano vrednost, da informacije, razkrite po MSRP 8, pripomorejo k boljšemu razumevanju letnega poročila kot celote in da se pri MSRP 8 povečuje tveganje razkrivanja občutljivih informacij. Sklepamo lahko tudi, da se stroški priprave informacij po MSRP 8 ne zmanjšajo pomembno. Če bi se, bi verjetno vsa podjetja ali vsaj večina takoj prešla na poročanje po MSRP 8, kar pa se pri podjetjih v avtomobilski industriji ni zgodilo.
Keywords:poročanje po poslovnih odsekih (MSRP 8), poročanje po odsekih (MRS 14), razkritja o odsekih podjetja in z njimi povezanih informacij (SFAS 131), mednarodni standardi računovodskega poročanja (MSRP), ameriški splošno sprejeti standardi (US GAAP), vodilna oseba za sprejemanje poslovnih odločitev (CODM), območni odsek, področni odsek, poslovni odsek, avtomobilska industrija
Place of publishing:Ravne na Koroškem
Publisher:[M. Vrčkovnik]
Year of publishing:2009
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-11748 New window
UDC:657
COBISS.SI-ID:10061852 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:X1J9JUEO
Publication date in DKUM:08.12.2009
Views:3718
Downloads:300
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:EPF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:CHANGES IN REPORTING BY SEGMENTS BY IFRS 8 IN COMPARISON WITH HIS PREDECESSOR IAS 14
Abstract:From 1.1.2009 on all companies which report according to IFRS will be obligated to reveal information according to IFRS 8, which has replaced IAS 14. IFRS 8 is a standard that is almost a copy of the American standard SFAS 131. The acceptance of this standard is mainly the consequence of achieving convergence of IFRS and US GAAP. With IFRS 8 the definition of segments is changed essentially. While with IAS 14 the segments are defined as business and geographical, the segments which IFRS 8 reports on are based on the information about the components of the entity that top management (CODM) uses to make decisions about operating matters. In theoretical part we presented standard operating segments (IFRS 8) and standard segment reporting (IAS 14) and compared them with each other. We also studied changes and impact of adoption of IFRS 8 from preparers' and users' point of view. We found out that preparers took the new standard very well, while the users were quite reserved. Most repeated weakness that users mentioned was not obligatory reporting by geographical segments and reduction in comparison of information, because of exemption of risk and reward criteria in IFRS 8. In automotive industry, regardless of the standard used, companies disclose almost the same kind of information. Differences occur in the number of reported segments and in the items disclosed which by our findings does not depend on the standard by which information was disclosed. By this we discarded our assertions, that information disclosed under IFRS 8 have higher value for external users, that information disclosed under IFRS 8 help with understanding of annual report as a whole and that with disclosing information under IFRS 8 a higher risk of disclosing sensitive information exists. We can also conclude, that costs of preparation of information under IFRS 8 are not reduced significantly. If they had reduced, all companies would disclose their information under IFRS 8, but that has not occurred in the automotive industry.
Keywords:Operating segments (IFRS 8), segment reporting (IAS 14), Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131), International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), US Generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP), chief operating decision maker (CODM), business segment, geographical segment, operating segment, automobile industry


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica