| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Javni red in nogometno navijaštvo v EU
Authors:ID Čepič, Vasja (Author)
ID Hojnik, Janja (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Cepic_Vasja_2009.pdf (1,05 MB)
MD5: B2D03510341960789003A6A4810ECC9C
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/ec958af4-477d-4561-9d8e-1b5aa58a501c
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V diplomskem delu skušam pojasniti vpliv primarne in sekundarne evropske zakonodaje na izjeme iz razlogov javnega reda in javne varnosti, ki jih države članice lahko navedejo pri omejitvah gibanja državljanov Unije. Katere ukrepe lahko slednje sprejmejo v primerih organiziranih nogometnih navijaških skupin, kako obravnavajo posameznike — državljane Unije, ali upoštevajo splošno prepoved diskriminacije med lastnimi državljani in državljani Unije in kako ta prepoved dejansko vpliva na postopke, ki jih država članica gostiteljica vodi zoper osebe, katerih gibanje omejujejo na podlagi izjeme javnega reda in/ali javne varnosti. Predmet raziskave je tudi, kako organi držav članic v praksi upoštevajo primarno in sekundarno zakonodajo EU (torej Pogodbo o ES in Direktivo 2004/38 in druge dokumente) in kako države članice implementirajo evropsko zakonodajo v svoj pravni red. Zaradi nujne skladnosti primarne in sekundarne zakonodaje je uporaba ukrepov zavrnitve vstopa ali izgona proti državljanom druge države članice skrajno sredstvo, ki ga lahko država članica gostiteljica uporabi; kajti državljan Unije je tudi »njen« državljan in je v očeh zakona popolnoma enakopraven državljanom države članice gostiteljice, zato mora biti deležen tudi enakega obravnavanja. Poleg tega poskušam razložiti, kdaj navijaštvo preraste v huliganstvo in kdaj je v nasprotju z javnim redom ali ogroža javno varnost; opisujem tudi nekaj tipičnih primerov neprimernega osebnega obnašanja, ki škoduje samim temeljem družbe in je lahko podlaga za zavrnitev vstopa ali deportacijo državljana Unije in kako se države članice, njihove policije in Interpol borijo proti huliganom, ki kvarijo nogomet. Kje je meja med varovanjem javnega reda države članice in diskriminacijo državljana EU? Kje so meje suverenosti držav članic in meje veljavnosti Pogodbe o ES in ostale zakonodaje EU? Odgovore na ta vprašanja ponuja sodna praksa Sodišča ES, ki je s sodbami v preteklih zadevah poskušalo napolniti pravne praznine in ponuditi bolj jasno definicijo pojem javni red. Mednarodne nogometne tekme predstavljajo državljanom Unije možnost udejanjanja pravice gibanja po prostoru EU, prav tako omogočajo državam članicam krepiti sodelovanje, na preizkušnjo pa postavljajo tudi policiste držav članic gostiteljic in Nacionalne nogometne informacijske točke, ki so tisti, ki morajo skrbeti, da pravo EU ni zgolj črka na papirju. Vse to pa tlakuje pot novi, bolj tesni obliki povezanosti držav EU — Združenim državam Evrope!
Keywords:Pravo EU, Sodišče ES, Pogodba o ES, Direktiva 2004/38, javni red, državljanstvo EU, enakopravno obravnavanje, državna suverenost, nogometni navijači, mednarodne nogometne tekme, Nacionalna nogometna informacijska točka, huligani
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[V. Čepič]
Year of publishing:2009
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-11924 New window
UDC:34(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3977771 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:XGMGRQPU
Publication date in DKUM:14.12.2009
Views:3077
Downloads:309
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Public order and football fans in EU
Abstract:The thesis explains the influence of the primary and secondary European legislation on the exceptions, based on the reasons of public order and public safety, that member states can recourse to for restriction of movement of EU citizens. What restricitive actions can member states take in the cases of organized football fans, how they treat individuals - EU citizens; are member state's actions discriminatory to EU citizens or do they treat them the same as their own citizens? How are the articles of EC Treaty and Directive 2004/38 respected in the legal procedings and how do member states implement Community law in their legal system? The imperative compliance between EC Treaty and secondary legislation limits the scope of state restrictive actions and rejection or deportation of EU citizen is an extreme measure and recourse to such actions must be confined; because EU citizens and citizens of the home state are equal and must be treated as such. The thesis also explains, when or why are football fans considered hooligans and are in conflict with public order or a threat to public safety; a few examples of such behaviour, which is harmful to the foundations of society itself and can be the grounds for rejection or deportation of EU citizen, are also described. How do member states, their police forces and Interpol fight these hooligans, that are spoiling the game? Where are the boundries of sovereignty of member states? The thin lines between protecting public order and discrimination is described and the answers to these questions are found in the case materials of European Court of Justice, which tries to fill the legal voids with it's decisions. International football matches represent a chance of the EU citizens to exercise the right to move and reside freely. It also enables the member states to strenghten their cooperation and also test their police officers and National football information points, who must ensure that Community law in not just ink on the paper. All this paves the way to a new, tighter integration of EU member states – United states of Europe.
Keywords:EU law, European Court of Justice, EC Treaty, Directive 2004/38, public order, EU citizenship, equal treatment, state sovereignty, football fans, international football matches, National football information point (NFIP), hooligans


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica