| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:RAZMEJEVANJE MED PREKRŠKOM IN KAZNIVIM DEJANJEM V TEORIJI IN PRAKSI
Authors:ID Trinkaus, Denis (Author)
ID Selinšek, Liljana (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Trinkaus_Denis_2009.pdf (4,49 MB)
MD5: 650AEA012EDED5DBC8E6027511C5E40D
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V diplomski nalogi se ukvarjam s temeljnimi značilnostmi prekrškov kot ene izmed treh vrst kaznivih ravnanj. V nalogi sem na kratko predstavil tudi zgodovinski pregled prekrškovnega prava na območju RS ter v nadaljevanju ob najpomembnejših teorijah razlikovanja prikazal poglede kazenskopravnih teoretikov na problematiko razlikovanja med kaznivimi dejanji in prekrški. Bistvene razlike sem prikazal glede odgovornosti za prekršek pravnih oseb, samostojnih podjetnikov, ter posameznikov, ki samostojno opravljajo dejavnost. Manj razlik najdemo pri obravnavi mladoletnikov. Najpomembnejše razlike so v načinu predpisovanja prekrškov oziroma kaznivih dejanj, saj kazniva dejanja predpisuje zgolj zakonodajalec z zakonom, medtem ko lahko prekrške predpisuje tudi vlada z uredbo in samoupravna lokalna skupnost z odlokom. Z analizo ureditve v drugih državah sem ugotovil, da imajo druge države podobno kot RS postopek o prekršku razdeljen na dva dela, pri čemer prvi del poteka pred prekrškovnim organom, drugi del pa pred rednim sodiščem.
Keywords:Kazenski postopek, Kaznivo dejanje, Mladoletniki, Odgovornost pravne osebe, Prekršek, Prekrškovni organ, Prekrškovno pravo
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2009
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-12157 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:3977003 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:ZM4NLC9T
Publication date in DKUM:21.05.2025
Views:197
Downloads:95
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:DEMARCATING BETWEEN MINOR OFFENCE AND CRIMINAL OFEENS IN THEORY AND PRACTISE
Abstract:In my thesis I have been dealing with fundamental characteristics of minor offences which are one of the three types of criminal offences. There is also a short introduction of historical review of minor offences law on the area of Republic Slovenia in my paper. Furthermore I have demonstrated on the basis of most significant theories of differentiation points of criminal law-theorists on question of distinction between criminal offences and minor offences. There are shown relevant discrepancies about the liability of legal persons for an offence and about others kinds of legal persons. By discussion of minors we can not find many discrepancies. The most significant differences are in the manner of prescription of minor offences or criminal offences. Only the law-making body can with an act prescribe criminal offences, whereas minor offences can also be prescribed by the government with a regulation or by the local self-government with a decree. With analysis of arrangement in other states I have found out, that other states have very similar classification of minor offences proceeding. First part takes place in front of minor offences body, second part takes place in front of regular court.
Keywords:Criminal procedure, Criminal offence, Minors, Liability of a legal person, Minor offence, Minor offences body, Minor offences law


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica