| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:EKSPERIMENTALNA OBRAVNAVA PRETAKANJA TEKOČIN V 4. IN 5. RAZREDU OSNOVNE ŠOLE
Authors:ID Zajec, Nina (Author)
ID Marhl, Marko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Repnik, Robert (Comentor)
Files:.pdf UNI_Zajec_Nina_2010.pdf (2,89 MB)
MD5: DF335C722325371737BDDF5F1EF47785
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/db4e0a44-3848-453c-a66e-961c81917d73
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Abstract:V okviru projekta Razvoj naravoslovnih kompetenc sta bili med drugimi razviti tudi dve učili, katerih namen je, da so učitelju razrednega pouka v pomoč pri obravnavi učnega sklopa Pretakanje snovi — tekočin. Osnovni namen raziskave je bil ugotoviti, kakšne razlike se pokažejo pri obravnavi iste teme na enak način, enkrat v 4., drugič v 5. razredu osnovne šole in pri kateri izbiri učne oblike (frontalna ali skupinsko delo) se obravnava učne teme, pretakanje tekočin z vključitvijo obeh učil v pouk, izkaže kot uspešnejša. Preizkus učil je bil izveden na dveh osnovnih šolah, in sicer v štirih 4. in štirih 5. razredih. Podatke smo zbrali s pregledom delovnih listov, mnenj učiteljev izvajalcev in hospitiranja avtorice gradiv. Ugotovili smo, da obstajajo razlike med 4. in 5. razredom. Rezultati preizkusa so pokazali, da sta obe izvedeni učni obliki dela z vključitvijo obeh učil v pouk primerni v 5. razredu, medtem ko se je v 4. razredu kot primernejša — tudi po mnenju v preizkusu sodelujočih učiteljev — pokazala frontalna učna oblika dela. Upoštevaje višjo razvojno stopnjo otrok smo v 5. razredu glede na 4. razred ugotovili, da so učenci 5. razreda med obravnavo snovi osvojili več znanj in pojmov kot učenci 4. razreda glede na predznanje posamezne starostne skupine pred obravnavo. Med poukom sta se v obeh razredih spodbujali in razvijali sposobnost ustnega in pisnega komuniciranja; s preizkusom pa se je potrdila višja sposobnost petošolcev v primerjavi s četrtošolci tako v ustnem kot v pisnem komuniciranju, kar pa je ena pomembnejših naravoslovnih kompetenc. Obravnava teme Pretakanje tekočin je ob uporabi obeh učil dvignila motivacijo za delo in sodelovanje pri pouku v obeh razredih neodvisno od izbire učne oblike, zato priporočamo ta način dela, saj prispeva k boljšemu odnosu do predmeta in do naravoslovnih vsebin.
Keywords:Ključne besede: pretakanje tekočin, učila, naravoslovne kompetence, frontalna oblika, skupinska oblika.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[N. Zajec]
Year of publishing:2010
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-15028 New window
UDC:53(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:17846280 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:LMKFVZP0
Publication date in DKUM:06.09.2010
Views:4561
Downloads:457
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PEF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF LIQUID FLOW IN CLASS 4 AND 5 OF PRIMARY SCHOOL
Abstract:ABSTRACT Two teaching aids were developed within the project Development of Natural Science Competences. Their purpose is to help primary school teachers to discuss the theme Substance flow– fluids. The main purpose of research was to assess the differences that occur in discussing the theme in the same way in 4th and 5th class of primary school, and which teaching form (frontal or group work) is better for discussing the theme using the two mentioned teaching aids. Testing the aids was carried out in two primary schools and in four different 4th and four 5th classes. The data was collected by examining handouts, opinions of teachers who used the teaching aids, and by attending lessons of author of teaching materials. We found out that there are differences between 4th and 5th classes. The results showed that both teaching forms with teaching aids used are suitable for 5th class. Meanwhile, frontal teaching form is more suitable for 4th class, which even teachers involved agreed upon. The research also showed, considering higher stage of development of students in higher class, that students in 5th classes learned more than students in 4th ones. The ability of oral and written communication, which is one of the most important natural science competences, was stimulated during the lessons. The research also confirmed higher ability of oral and written communication of students in 5th classes than the students in 4th classes. Discussing the theme of fluid flow by using both teaching aids raised the motivation for work and cooperation in lessons in both classes, regardless of the form used. That is why we recommend this way of work which adds to better relation to the subject and natural science topics.
Keywords:liquid flow, teaching aids, natural science competence, frontal form, group work


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica