Vojaška obveščevalna dejavnost : aktivna obramba pred JRKB/E terorizmom

Rode, Anže

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Vojaška obveščevalna dejavnost : aktivna obramba pred JRKB/E terorizmom
Authors:	ID Rode, Anže (Author) ID Ivanuša, Teodora (Mentor) More about this mentor... ID Podbregar, Iztok (Comentor)
Files:	DR_Rode_Anze_i2010.pdf (2,78 MB) MD5: 109108A300B7B35ADBEDC7A8D03DB6AC PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/2418aa52-a8e6-47d2-ba35-58b4b7bf18b7
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Dissertation
Organization:	FL - Faculty of Logistic
Abstract:	Klasične vojaške oblike ogrožanja sveta vse bolj nadomeščajo moderne oblike ogrožanja varnosti, katerih glavne značilnosti so asimetričnost delovanja, kompleksnost, transnacionalnost, raznovrstnost in nedoločljivost struktur, vse večja stopnja organiziranosti nevarnih družbenih skupin ter njihova spretnost v uporabi sodobnih komunikacij. Nekatere hujše oblike navedenih groženj, kot je tudi JRKB/E terorizem, lahko v temeljih zamajejo globalno stabilnost (Rode, 2007, str. 5). Strokovna javnost se bo najverjetneje strinjala, da dojemamo terorizem kot eno največjih groženj trenutni stvarnosti. Države, ki morajo zagotoviti varnost svojim državljanom, to zagotavljajo tudi z vojaško obveščevalno dejavnostjo (VOBDE), kjer je za pridobivanje obveščevalnih podatkov, (vojaška) obveščevalna dejavnost razvila več podzvrsti obveščevalne dejavnosti (Joint intelligence doctrine, 2003). Podzvrsti obveščevalne dejavnosti oziroma tudi funkcionalne obveščevalne discipline zajemajo mnoge vidike obveščevalne produkcije in pogosto zahtevajo specialistično analitično strokovno znanje. Na primeru obveščevalne dejavnosti na področju zdravstva, kažemo pomen nacionalne podpore (REACH BACK) za VOBDE, saj je tako na najbolj racionalen način možno zagotoviti specifična in ekspertna znanja, ki jih običajno v VOBDE ni. V doktorskem delu ves čas sledimo osnovni predpostavki, da obstoječi model VOBDE ne sledi zahtevam sodobnega varnostnega okolja glede groženj varnosti in ne omogoča ustreznega odgovora na varnostne grožnje. Zato trdimo, da moramo zdravstveno obveščevalno dejavnost preko nacionalne podpore (REACH BACK) vključiti v delovanje VOBDE in tako na najbolj racionalen način zagotoviti najvišjo možno stopnjo varnosti. Pri proučevanju VOBDE v boju proti orožjem za množično uničevanje in JRKB/E terorizmu, uporabljamo lastno opredelitev terorizma. JRKB/E terorizem, se po svojih vzrokih, vrstah in značilnostih ne razlikuje od ostalega terorizma, razlikuje se po načinu izvedbe napada; to je napada z JRKB agensi, ki predstavljajo orožja za množično uničevanje. Bojevanje proti JRKB/E terorizmu, moramo po našem mnenju poimenovati aktivna obramba pred orožji za množično uničevanje, saj si predvsem zaradi možnih in nesprejemljivih posledic napada ne smemo dovoliti, da do tovrstnega terorističnega napada sploh pride.
Keywords:	orožje za množično uničevanje, terorizem
Place of publishing:	[Maribor
Publisher:	A. Rode]
Year of publishing:	2010
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-15341
UDC:	355.40:323.285(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:	250918912
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:RWVTYIPJ
Publication date in DKUM:	03.09.2010
Views:	7956
Downloads:	793
Metadata:
Categories:	FL
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Vojaška obveščevalna dejavnost - aktivna obramba pred JRKB/E terorizmom
Abstract:	Conventional military threats to the world are being increasingly replaced by modern security threats. Their main features are the asymmetry of activity, complexity, transnationality, diversity and non-predictable structures, an increasing level of organization of dangerous groups and their skill in the use of modern communications. Some of these threats, such as CBRN/E terrorism may shake the foundations of global stability (Rode, 2007, p. 5). The professional public is likely to agree that we perceive terrorism as one of the greatest threats to the current security. States which must ensure the safety of their citizens resort to, among other things, military intelligence activities to obtain intelligence information. States, as one of the principle actors trying to ensure the security of citizens, are looking for appropriate responses to threats, both in collaboration and networking with other countries and international bodies, as well as in the modified mode of operation within the country. States which must ensure the safety of their citizens resort to, among other things, military intelligence activities to obtain intelligence information. As a result a number of Intelligence Functional Disciplines - Subject Areas (Joint intelligence doctrine, 2003), have been developed within the overall (military) intelligence. which cover many aspects of intelligence production and often require specialist analytical expertise. The authors used the case of medical field (medical intelligence - MEDINT) to show the importance of national support (REACH BACK) to military intelligence, since this is the most rational way possible to ensure both specific and expert knowledge, which usually lacks in the military intelligence. This thesis is based on the assumption that the existing Military Intelligence (MI) model does not follow the requirements of the modern security environment in terms of threats and security. The model does not allow adequate response to security threats. Therefore, we claim that medical intelligence elements should be included in the MI through the national support (REACH BACK), thus providing the most rational way to ensure the highest possible level of security. In the study of the role of military intelligence in the fight against terrorism, the authors used their own definition of terrorism, whereby terrorism is associated with the method and objectives of terrorist activity (the victims). CBRN / E terrorism is in terms of its its causes, types and characteristics no different from terrorism, which is included in the general definition of terrorism. The difference lies in the means used in the attack, that is CBRN / E agents. Combating weapons of mass destruction, should in our view be referred to as active defense against weapons of mass destruction, especially because an CBRN / E terrorist attack should not be allowed to happen given the consequences of such an attack.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back