| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:PRIMERJAVA MODELA VREDNOTENJA DOLGOROČNIH NALOŽB (CAPM) IN ARBITRAŽNE TEORIJE CEN (APT)
Authors:ID Miklič, Katja (Author)
ID Zbašnik, Dušan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Miklic_Katja_2011.pdf (509,48 KB)
MD5: 6694A277394CE9FFBC0FE15AD688ED7E
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/dfeb9c5d-ef70-4961-b7d1-d7c2208d7f95
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:Spoznati želimo model vrednotenja dolgoročnih naložb (CAPM) in arbitražno teorijo cen naložb (APT). Oba modela želita ugotoviti, kakšne bodo pričakovane donosnosti v nekem portfelju. S CAPM-jem izračunavamo pričakovane donosnosti s pomočjo povprečja in variance, medtem ko so pri APT-ju pomembni faktorji. APT je neke vrste nadgradnja CAPM-ja. Raziskovalci, ki so modela primerjali (pri gozdarskih in kmetijskih naložbah) so ugotovili, da je APT model krepkejši, vendar pa tudi rezultatov CAPM-ja ne gre zanemariti. Pri obeh pa so med svojim raziskovanjem naleteli na težave. Oba imata svoje prednosti in slabosti. Kitajski raziskovalci so ugotovili, da je APT na kitajskem borznem trgu neuporaben, medtem ko so na Japonskem tudi testirali ta model in pokazali, da je ta model v prednosti pred CAPM-jem. CAPM pa se lahko uporablja tudi kot orodje za strateško planiranje, in sicer v korporacijah, ki se morajo odločiti, katere posle bodo obdržali in katere odstranili.
Keywords:moderna portfeljska teorija (MPT), model vrednotenja dolgoročnih naložb (CAPM), arbitražna teorija cen naložb (APT), portfelj, diverzifikacija, tveganje, specifično tveganje, sistematično tveganje, koeficient β
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[K. Miklič]
Year of publishing:2011
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-18601 New window
UDC:336.76
COBISS.SI-ID:10716444 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:TLKLSUQ0
Publication date in DKUM:06.07.2011
Views:2993
Downloads:329
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:EPF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:COMPARISON BETWEEN CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM) AND ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY (APT)
Abstract:We want to represent capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and arbitrage pricing theory (APT). With both models we can calculate what the expected return will be in a portfolio. With CAPM we can calculate expected returns with averages and variances but in arbitrage pricing theory factors are important. APT is kind of upgrede of CAPM. Researchers who compered the models (in forestry-related investments and agricultural investments) have found that the APT model is more robust. But the findings of CAPM should not be neglected. They have had problems throughout their research with both models. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. Chinese researchers have found that the APT is not applicable on Chinese security market. While in Japan APT was also tested and shows a superiority over the CAPM. CAPM can be used as a tool for strategic planning in multi-divisional firms that must decide which business will be retained and which removed.
Keywords:modern portfolio theory (MPT), capital asset pricing model (CAPM), arbitrage pricing theory (APT), portfolio, diversification, risk, systematic risk, specific risk, β coefficient


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica