| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Aorist in imperfekt v Kopitarjevi izdaji Cločevega glagolita
Authors:ID Mikulan, Iztok (Author)
ID Jesenšek, Marko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Mikulan_Iztok_2011.pdf (1,28 MB)
MD5: 68B7A22BE2CCC23015E7DCF63FB14263
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/2140a89b-3cc3-464f-a9be-1f482bd38583
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Diplomsko delo predstavlja dva starocerkvenoslovanska glagolska časa, aorist in imperfekt. Analiza oblik in rabe aorista ter imperfekta je temeljila na Kopitarjevi izdaji Cločevega glagolita. To je kanonski glagolski spomenik stare cerkvene slovanščine, ki je nastal po bolgarski predlogi nekje na Hrvaškem najkasneje v 11. stoletju. Ohranjen je le manjši del kodeksa, a je njegova izdaja pomenila velik premik v raziskovanju tega jezika. Aorist in imperfekt sta obstajala že v indoevropščini in zato je v teoretičnem delu nakazan razvoj teh oblik preko stare grščine in latinščine. Njuna raba je v nekaterih slovanskih jezikih začela upadati že v času, ko je Cločev glagolit nastal, drugi jeziki, predvsem južnoslovanski, pa so ju ohranili do danes. Analiza je pokazala, da sta obe obliki v stari cerkveni slovanščini 11. stoletja še pogosti. V tako kratkem besedilu se pojavi kar 328 oblik aorista ali imperfekta. Za lažjo predstavo o tem, kako so se različne oblike aorista in imperfekta uporabljale, je dodan seznam nedoločnikov, ki so v besedilu Cločevega glagolita postavljeni vanju, vsaki različni obliki pa je dodan del sobesedila. Preteklost se je v stari cerkveni slovanščini lahko izražala še z oblikami perfekta, a je v ohranjenih besedilih na ta način izražena mnogo redkeje. Tako aorist kot imperfekt sta lahko bila uporabljena tudi kot stilno sredstvo. Zaradi značilnih končnic namreč ob kopičenju oblik (kar je pri pridigah pogosto) ustvarjata občutek ritma in rime. V besedilu so zapisane vse pričakovane oblike aoristov in imperfektov, saj je tvorba večinoma sledila paradigmam. V nekaj primerih je prišlo do nepričakovanih oblik, kar priča o jezikovnih spremembah in vplivu narečij živega jezika na staro cerkveno slovanščino.
Keywords:Cločev glagolit, glagol, aorist, imperfekt, stara cerkvena slovanščina, Jernej Kopitar
Place of publishing:Celje
Publisher:[I. Mikulan]
Year of publishing:2011
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-18828 New window
UDC:811.163.6(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:18564616 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:E0T5WUZQ
Publication date in DKUM:05.09.2011
Views:10723
Downloads:332
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(1 vote)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Aorist and imperfect in Kopitar's Glagolita Clozianus
Abstract:The thesis deals with two verb tenses of Old Church Slavonic – aorist and imperfect. The analysis of their forms and use is based on Kopitar's edition of Glagolita Clozianus. Glagolita Clozianus is a canonical glagolitic manuscript of Old Church Slavonic which was made somewhere in Croatia from a Bulgarian original, no later than in the 11th century. Only a small part of the codex is preserved; however, its publishing was significant for the research of this language. Aorist and imperfect were already present in the Indo-European language family, hence the theoretical part of the thesis deals with the development of these forms via Old Greek and Latin. Their use in some of the Slavic languages already started diminishing at the time when Glagolita Clozianus was written; however, other languages, mostly South Slavic, have preserved it until this day. The analysis has shown that both forms in Old Church Slavonic of the 11th century are still frequent. There are, surprisingly, 328 forms of aorist or imperfect in such a short text. In order to clarify how different forms of aorist and imperfect were used, a list of infinitives which formed aorists and/or imperfects in Glagolita Clozianus is added; for every different form a part of the context is added. In Old Church Slavonic, the past could also be expressed with the forms of perfect, but in the extant texts this mode of expression is rare. Aorist as well as imperfect could be used as a stylistic device. Because of their characteristic endings and the fact that more of such forms are accumulated within a short body of text (which is a frequent occurence in homilies), they create a sense of rhythm and rhyme. The text features all of the expected forms of aorists and imperfects, because the formation usually followed the paradigms. In some cases there were unexpected forms, providing us with evidence on the language changes and the influence of dialects of living languages upon Old Church Slavonic.
Keywords:Glagolita Clozianus, verb, aorist, imperfect, Old Church Slavonic, Jernej Kopitar


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica