PRIMERJALNA ANALIZA ERP SISTEMOV SAP IN MICROSOFT DYNAMICS NAV

Polajner, Nino Antonin

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	PRIMERJALNA ANALIZA ERP SISTEMOV SAP IN MICROSOFT DYNAMICS NAV
Authors:	ID Polajner, Nino Antonin (Author) ID Bobek, Samo (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Polajner_Nino_Antonin_2011.pdf (1,09 MB) MD5: 4D33859CFB56F05E6CF1D6C1E517E4D4 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/38f8f072-22d0-4a10-8856-fd8359e9a5aa
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Final seminar paper
Organization:	EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:	ERP rešitve so za današnja podjetja ena izmed ključnih sestavin poslovanja. Le z njimi lahko podjetje sledi stalnemu napredku in je konkurenčno na samem trgu. Vendar pa je sama izdelava programske opreme ERP zelo draga. Zaradi te težave podjetja ne izdelujejo svojih ERP rešitev in raje prepustijo strokovnjakom na tem področju, da uvedejo samo rešitev v podjetje. Ker pa je ponudba na tržišču tako zelo pestra, imajo zato podjetja na voljo veliko rešitev. Zato je bistveno, da se pred odločitvijo, katero bi radi uporabljali, v podjetju podrobno posvetijo poslovnemu procesu podjetja in nato izberejo najprimernejšo. SAP R/3 in NAV sta celoviti informacijski rešitvi. Razlikujeta se v tem, da je SAP R/3 programiran za srednje velika, še bolj pa za velika podjetja. NAV pa je programiran bolj za majhna in srednje velika podjetja (Microsoft ima namreč za velika podjetja razvito rešitev Microsoft Dynamics AX). Skupno obema je, da imata modularno zgradbo, zato sta sestavljeni iz različnih modulov. Podjetja pa se sama odločijo ali bodo zakupila licenco za vse module ali pa samo za tiste, ki jih resnično potrebujejo v podjetju. Uvajanje obeh rešitev poteka po podobnih poteh z razliko v samih fazah. SAP-ova ASAP metodologija uvajanja ima pet faz, medtem ko ima NAV metodologija SureStep najprej šest faz, ki pa se lahko razširijo v dve dodatni fazi. V zadnjem delu diplomskega seminarja sledi primerjava obeh ERP rešitev, izpostavili smo skupne točke in primerjali njuni metodologiji uvajanja.
Keywords:	ERP, SAP R/3, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, metodologija SureStep, metodologija ASAP, uvajanje ERP rešitev
Place of publishing:	Lovrenc na Pohorju
Publisher:	[N. A. Polajner]
Year of publishing:	2011
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-20126
UDC:	659.2:004
COBISS.SI-ID:	10854428
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:4CDFUPSQ
Publication date in DKUM:	24.11.2011
Views:	3717
Downloads:	310
Metadata:
Categories:	EPF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ERP SYSTEMS SAP AND MICROSOFT DYNAMICS NAV
Abstract:	ERP solutions are today key ingredients for companies and their business. These are the key factors for company to continuously progress and to be competitive on today's market. But unfortunately the development of these solutions is very expensive and so companies do not have the budget to develop their own ERP solutions. Thusly they rather let the experts of the field handle the problem and implement a pre-made solution into their business process. The supply of the solutions is very great. So the companies have a lot to choose from and have to overwiev the business process very thoroughly so they will be able to choose they right solution. Furthermore, SAP R/3 and NAV are ERP solutions with a difference for which country thesse solutions are programmed. SAP R/3 is programmed for medium-sized and large companies meanwhile NAV is programmed for smaller and medium-sized companies (Microsoft has developed the solution called Microsoft Dynamics AX for large companies). Their joint feature is their modular composition with a lot of modules that can either be bought or left out depending of what kind of options the company wants. The implementation of both solutions is nearly the same with a difference in fase of implementation. Sap R/3's ASAP has five fases while Nav's SureStep has six fases with an option to expand the six fase implementation with two more fases. In the last part of the graduate seminar will take part the comparative analysis of both solutions, where the common points are presented with their implementation methodology.
Keywords:	ERP, SAP R/3, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, SureStep methodology, ASAP methodology, ERP solutions implementation

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back