| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:ANALIZA IN SINTEZA KRMILNEGA SISTEMA VODENJA VARNOSTNIH VRAT OBDELOVALNEGA STROJA
Authors:ID Ferme, Gašper (Author)
ID Župerl, Uroš (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Šafarič, Riko (Comentor)
Files:.pdf UNI_Ferme_Gasper_2011.pdf (2,30 MB)
MD5: 06D828F22186943CF52523F148D13357
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/e2b34236-08de-4670-9e8b-54e38b7b85f0
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Abstract:Veliko strojev ima varnostna vrata na ročno zapiranje, zato smo v diplomskem delu analizirali in preučili, kateri avtomatski sistem odpiranja vrat bi bilo najugodneje vgraditi na takšen obdelovalni stroj. Na eni strani imamo pnevmatični sistem krmiljenja, na drugi pa hidravlični. Oba sta predstavljena posebej in modelirana, glede na izvedbo, v programu Automation Studio. Sisteme smo optimirali in merili odzive. Na koncu smo jih med seboj primerjali glede na vzdrževanje, stroške, kompleksnost izgradnje, izvedbo in enostavnost uporabe in ugotovili, da je najbolj ugodna izvedba z elektropnevmatičnimi komponentami.
Keywords:pnevmatika, hidravlika, krmiljenje, Automation Studio, simulacije
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[G. Ferme]
Year of publishing:2011
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-21071 New window
UDC:681.5
COBISS.SI-ID:15998486 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:AF8IHXY6
Publication date in DKUM:02.11.2011
Views:2279
Downloads:324
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FS
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF MACHINE TOOL DOORS
Abstract:Processing machines have a safety door with a manual closing system. To import automatic system in this kind of machines, we had analyzed, which system would be most proper to install. On one hand, we have pneumatic system control and on other hydraulic system. Both are presented separately and modeled in program Automation Studio, regarding to construction. In both cases we optimized the system and measured responses. At the end we compared them regarding to maintenance, system costs and simplicity of construction and came to conclusion, that the most efficient construction would be a system with electropneumatic components.
Keywords:pneumatic, hydraulic, control, Automation Studio, simulation


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica