NAČELO TAJNOSTI V MEDNARODNI GOSPODARSKI ARBITRAŽI

Krušič, Borut

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	NAČELO TAJNOSTI V MEDNARODNI GOSPODARSKI ARBITRAŽI
Authors:	ID Krušič, Borut (Author) ID Ferčič, Aleš (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Krusic_Borut_2011.pdf (1,32 MB) MD5: CCC6915949CA98EF52D440C26114B022 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/4473c806-2603-4340-bb4e-8a3cccaebb70
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Vsak trgovski odnos lahko potencialno sproži spor in sodobna trgovina je za nemoten razvoj ter hitro in učinkovito reševanje nesoglasij morala razviti poseben institut. Arbitraža predstavlja eno izmed alternativnih oblik, saj ima sam postopek številne prednosti (strokovnost, fleksibilnost), a tudi nekaj slabosti. Nadalje so arbitri v samem postopku dolžni spoštovati različna procesna načela, med katerimi je zelo pomembno tudi načelo tajnosti arbitražnega postopka. Arbitražni postopek je načeloma tajne narave, strankam pa je dana možnost, da vodijo in sodelujejo v postopku brez prisotnosti javnosti. Zaupnost arbitražnega postopka je eden izmed ključnih elementov arbitražnega postopka. V svetu sta se razvila dva koncepta obravnave načela tajnosti. Sistem implicitno določene zaupnosti in sistem izrecno določene zaupnosti. V sistemu izrecno določene zaupnosti mora biti tajnost določena (v arbitražnem sporazumu, v mednarodni konvenciji, v nacionalni zakonodaji, v pravilih institucionalnih arbitraž ali v sodni praksi), medtem ko se v sistemu implicitno določene zaupnosti ta dolžnost predpostavlja. Svetovni pravni sistemi različno urejajo obravnavano področje. Načelo zaupnosti se v arbitražnem postopku veže različnih elementov. Ta obveznost se lahko nanaša na sam arbitražni postopek, ter dolžnost strank in arbitrov ohraniti samo eksistenco arbitražnega postopka tajno. Nadalje se lahko zaupnost v arbitražnem postopku veže na podatke in dokaze pridobljene med samim postopkom. In ne nazadnje, zaupnost v povezavi z arbitražno odločbo, kot sklepnim aktom v procesu. V praksi so znani tudi primeri, ki so izoblikovali pravila, pod katerimi pogoji je dovoljeno razkriti varovane informacije (javni interes, dogovor strank, javni red, zaščita strankinih pravic, zadeve pred sodiščem). Edini sankciji, ki ju je možno uveljaviti ob domnevni kršitvi načela tajnosti arbitražnega postopka, sta denarna odškodnina ter zahteva za izdajo začasne odredbe, ki prepoveduje nadaljnja razkritja. V prihodnosti bi bilo najustrezneje urediti zmedo na tem področju z enotnim pravilom glede upoštevanjem načela tajnosti arbitražnega postopka.
Keywords:	načelo tajnosti, zaupnost, zasebnost, arbitražni postopek, mednarodna arbitraža
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[B. Krušič]
Year of publishing:	2011
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-21096
UDC:	34(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	4284459
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:RCONZG7F
Publication date in DKUM:	02.11.2011
Views:	2928
Downloads:	368
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
Abstract:	Any commercial relationship has the potential to trigger conflict and modern-day trade had to develop a specific institute that would enable rapid and effective resolution of disputes. Arbitration is one of the alternative forms, since the procedure itself has many advantages (professionalism, flexibility) and on the other hand some disadvantages. Furthermore, the arbitrators have to comply with various procedural principles and one of the most important principles in the arbitration proceedings is the duty of confidentiality. In principle the arbitration process is confidential. Duty of confidentiality is one of the key elements in arbitration proceedings. The disputes often arise out of a very important business relationship and parties want to keep them confidential. Two concepts were developed in practice. Implied duty of confidentiality means that the parties should keep the information confidential in all cases. Conversely, explicit duty of confidentiality requires defined duty of confidentiality in one of the legal sources (an arbitration agreement or an international convention or national legislation or arbitration chambers institutional rules or case law). Various countries deal differently with the issue. Different elements of the arbitration are confidential. There may by a duty to keep the existence of the arbitration proceedings confidential. Furthermore, the evidence and documents introduced in the proceedings and the arbitration award should be kept confidential. In practice there are exceptions to the duty of confidentiality. Therefore information may be disclosed if there is a public interest, if the parties agree, in the courts or when the party has a legal right to do so. If the duty of confidentiality is breached the party that has been damaged has the right to monetary damages or to an injunction that prohibits further disclosure. A uniform rule should be formed in the future to prevent confusion in this area.
Keywords:	duty of confidentiality, confidentiality, privacy, the arbitration proceedings, international arbitration

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back