| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:PROBLEMI RAZMERJA MED NOSILCEM DEJAVNOSTI KONTROLINGA IN PREJEMNIKI INFORMACIJ LE-TE
Authors:ID Zamuda, Mateja (Author)
ID Kolar, Iztok (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Zamuda_Mateja_2012.pdf (1,51 MB)
MD5: 47995325920937F9A17E42AD595A8070
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/7d8b60cf-cb87-404f-9243-471173e8d4b9
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:Strokovnjaki pogosto svetujejo podjetjem, da se je treba prilagajati na spremembe s prestrukturiranjem podjetja in z uvedbo dejavnosti kontrolinga. Napovedujejo, da bo v prihodnosti vloga kontrolerjev narasla. Najpogosteje so nosilci dejavnosti kontrolinga kontrolerji, prejemniki informacij te dejavnosti pa so poslovodje. Obseg nalog kontrolerja je odvisen od več dejavnikov, in sicer od velikosti in zapletenosti organizacije, panoge, njegove osebnosti in sposobnosti ter od zamisli vrhovnega poslovodstva. Poslovodje najdemo v podjetju na vseh ravneh, glede kontrolerja pa stroka ni enotna, prav tako so različne tudi empirične raziskave. Ne glede na to, na kateri ravni v podjetju sta poslovodja in kontroler, je pomemben odnos med njima. Brez sodelovanja in komuniciranja med poslovodjem in kontrolerjem ni kontrolinga. Pomembno je, da se kontroler in poslovodja med seboj dobro poznata ter si zaupata. V praktičnem delu smo izvedli raziskavo o odnosu med nosilcem dejavnosti kontrolinga in prejemniki informacij le-te v slovenskih podjetjih. V raziskavi, ki je bila opravljena v štirih slovenskih podjetjih, so sodelovali štirje nosilci dejavnosti kontrolinga in devetnajst prejemnikov informacij dejavnosti kontrolinga. Najpomembnejše ugotovitve raziskave: ‒ odnos med poslovodji in kontrolerji oboji v povprečju ocenjujejo kot dober. Tudi sodelovanje in komunikacijo so ocenili kot dobro. Zaznati je razlike v ocenah med podjetji. V povprečju so najboljše ocene v podjetjema »C« in »D«; ‒ bistveno več konfliktov se pojavlja v podjetjema »A« in »B«; ‒ kontrolerji so pri svojih osebnostnih značilnostih najpogosteje izpostavili komunikativnost, inovativnost in vztrajnost; ‒ poslovodje so pri kontrolerjih najpogosteje izpostavili komunikativnost, vztrajnost in strpnost. Nihče med njimi ni omenil vedoželjnosti. Ker strokovnjaki poudarjajo pomen dejavnosti kontrolinga, menimo, da bi bila smiselna raziskava o odnosih med nosilci dejavnosti kontrolinga in prejemniki informacij le-te, v katero bi vključili večje število slovenskih podjetij.
Keywords:kontroling, dejavnost kontrolinga, prejemniki informacij dejavnosti kontrolinga, poslovodja, kontroler, odnosi med poslovodjem in kontrolerjem, kontrolerjeva poročila, konflikt, komunikacija.
Place of publishing:Žihlava
Publisher:[M. Zamuda]
Year of publishing:2011
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-21710 New window
UDC:657.6
COBISS.SI-ID:10963740 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:5RCLPSJJ
Publication date in DKUM:20.02.2012
Views:2303
Downloads:254
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:EPF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:PROBLEMS REGARDING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE HOLDER OF THE CONTROLLING ACTIVITY AND THE RECIPIENTS OF INFORMATION RELATED THERETO
Abstract:Experts often advise companies to adapt to changes by restructuring the corporate structure and introducing controlling activities. The role of controllers is expected to become ever more important in the future. Controlling activities are most often carried out by controllers and the information obtained in the process is for the most part relevant to managers. The range of tasks of the controller depends on several factors, namely the size and complexity of the organisation and of the relevant branch, the personality and the ideas of the controller, as well as the ideas of top management. While managers are included at all levels of the corporate structure, the role of controllers is more ambiguous in the eyes of experts and, according to empirical research, it may vary significantly. Regardless of the level on which the manager and the controller interact within a company, the relationship between them is of importance; if the manager and controller do not cooperate and communicate based on mutual trust, controlling activities are bound to bring no results. The practical part of this thesis includes a research on the relationship between the controller and recipients of information on his activities in Slovenian companies. Four Slovenian companies with four controllers and nineteen recipients of information on the activities of the controllers participated in the research. The key findings in the research are: – on average, both the managers and the controllers feel they have a good relationship with each other, and they also find the level of cooperation and communication between them to be satisfying. Results vary among companies, with the best scores in companies “C” and “D” on average; – significantly more conflict is present in companies “A” and “B”; – among their personality features, controllers mostly point out communication skills, innovativeness and persistence; – for managers, the most important characteristics of controllers include communication skills, persistence and patience. Neither the controllers nor the managers in mentioned curiosity among these features in the research. Since experts are insisting on the importance of controlling activities, we believe that it would be wise to explore the relationship between controllers and recipients of information on controlling activities in a greater number of Slovenian companies.
Keywords:controlling, controlling activities, recipients of information on controlling activities, manager, controller, relationship between the manager and the controller, controller's reports, conflict, communication.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica