| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:PRIMERJAVA REZULTATOV RAZLIČNIH MODELOV OKVIRNE KONSTRUKCIJE PRI ANALIZI POTRESNEGA VPLIVA
Authors:ID Roj, Janja (Author)
ID Skrinar, Matjaž (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Roj_Janja_2012.pdf (18,50 MB)
MD5: E93000F607D2A27B8C52DC6896B54466
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/8a71f40f-ffa1-46e5-92d7-d85f39dacd9f
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
Abstract:Pri potresni analizi se lahko uporabljajo različni modeli konstrukcij ter različne metode za izračun dinamičnih karakteristik konstrukcij, ki predstavljajo osnovo za analizo potresnega vpliva. Vodilo teh različnih pristopov je želja doseči dovolj dobre približke s čim enostavnejšimi metodami, ki nam prihranijo mnogo časa, še posebej v fazi snovanja konstrukcije. V diplomskem delu se za konstrukcijo, povzeto po strokovni literaturi, primerjajo rezultati različnih računskih pristopov več modelov konstrukcije, ki se razlikujejo po zahtevnosti. Za izračun nihajnega časa se uporabijo: ravninski model (analiziran z izrekom o ohranitvi mehanske energije, enačbo 4.9 iz SIST EN 1998 in dinamično matriko konstrukcije) in prostorninski model (analiziran s 3D pseudo analizo in z metodo končnih elementov z računalniškim programom Sofistik). Zaključek dela predstavlja primerjava dobljenih rezultatov z rezultati iz literature. Primerjava je jasno pokazala, da razlike lahko izvirajo tako iz poenostavitve računskega modela kot tudi iz metode analize. Te ugotovitve niso bile presenetljive, saj se je potrdilo, da ujemanje rezultatov narašča z dvigom kvalitete računskega modela. Hkrati se je izkazalo tudi, da zmanjšanje napake dejansko ni sorazmerno povečanju računskega napora pri uporabi kvalitetnejših modelov. Za obravnavano konstrukcijo, ki je regularna po višini in tlorisu, se je tako izkazalo, da je tudi ravninski model vodil do rezultatov, ki so znotraj sprejemljivih inženirskih meja.
Keywords:gradbeništvo, diplomsko delo, potresna analiza, okvirna konstrukcija, nihajni čas
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[J. Roj]
Year of publishing:2012
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-22104 New window
UDC:624.131.55(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:15811862 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:P9QJB5WS
Publication date in DKUM:21.02.2012
Views:3273
Downloads:267
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FG
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:COMPARISON OF SEISMIC ANALYSIS' RESULTS OF VARIOUS FRAME STRUCTURE'S MODELS
Abstract:There is a lot od different methods and models used for calculating dynamic characteristics of structures in seismic analysis, that form a base for analysis of seismic influence. The goal is to get enough accurate approximations with easiest methods possible, which save us a lot of time, especially in the design stage. In the diploma work we took a structure from scientific article and compared calculated results, which we got with several methods and models of the structure, which differ in complexity. For the calculation of the vibration period we used planar model (analyzed with the help of the theorem on the conservation of mechanical energy, with equation 4.9 from SIST EN 1998 and with dynamic matrix of structure) and 3D model (analyzed with with 3D pseudo analysis and with finite element method with computer program SOFiSTIK). The completion of the work is comparison of our results with the results of the scientific paper. The comparison showed that the origin of deviations can be simplification of the model as well as the method of analysis. These findings were not surprising, because they confirmed, that the deviation decreases with the rise of the quality of the model. We found out that decrease of deviation is not correlated with growth of mathematical effort, which is needed when using higher quality models. It turned out that planar model of a structure, that is regular in plan view and height, gives results, good enough for the engineering field.
Keywords:civil engineering, graduate work, seismic analysis, frame system construction, vibration period


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica