| Title: | Is color-dispositionalism nasty and unecological? |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Miščević, Nenad (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-006-9036-8
 RAZ_Miscevic_Nenad_2007.pdf (258,62 KB)
MD5: 7E6D961198971436A37AA62D1147A515
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Article |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FF - Faculty of Arts
|
|---|
| Abstract: | This article is a brief presentation and defense of response-dispositionalist intentionalism against a family of objections. The view claims that for a surface to have an objective stable color is to have a disposition to cause innormal observers a response, namely, intentional phenomenal-color experience. The objections, raised recently by M. Johnston, B. Stroud, and by Byrne and Hilbert, claim that any dispositionalist view is unfair to the naiveperceiverthinker, saddles her with massive error and represents her as maladaptated to her environment. The paper reconstructs the main line of thought in favor of response-intentionalism and argues that it is in fact rather charitable and fair to naive cognizers, and also avoids a cluster of related objections. |
|---|
| Keywords: | philosophy, color-dispositionalism, objections |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2007 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-35880  |
|---|
| UDC: | 165 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 0165-0106 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 15802632 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UM:DK:Y1UTNYIM |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 07.06.2012 |
|---|
| Views: | 2151 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 118 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
