Analiza primera M. Uhernik - preiskovalni vidik : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija

Guzelj, Jana

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Analiza primera M. Uhernik - preiskovalni vidik : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija
Authors:	ID Guzelj, Jana (Author) ID Dvoršek, Anton (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Guzelj_Jana_2012.pdf (597,14 KB) MD5: B8B0853E89D976F7847C1233793D9EE7 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/36eefdf8-44c1-4759-864f-965e3c840cf9
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:	V diplomski nalogi so zajete teoretične osnove preiskovanja umorov − od prvih ukrepov preiskovalcev, ko nekdo najde truplo, do končnih korakov, ki so potrebni, da se odkrije pravega storilca kaznivega dejanja. Da bi bila izvedba preiskave uspešna in učinkovita, pa je potreben dober organizacijski pristop preiskovalcev in nekatere spretnosti, veščine in znanja preiskovalcev, ki pripomorejo k uspešnemu zaključku primera. Pri vsakem od teh korakov, ki so potrebni za uspešen zaključek preiskave, pa obstaja možnost napak. Nekatere izmed njih so v teoretičnem delu predstavljene, še toliko bolj pa se odražajo v empiričnem delu, kjer so se napake dogajale na primeru, ki se je zgodil v Sloveniji. S pomočjo sodnega spisa bom analizirala preiskavo, ki je potekala ob umoru na Dolenjskem. V tem primeru je bilo storjenih mnogo napak, zaradi katerih je nedolžen človek preživel osem let v zaporu − ločen od svoje žene in dveh majhnih otrok. To je pustilo tudi velik pečat v njegovem življenju, saj sta otroka odraščala brez očeta, poleg tega pa je bil za vse življenje zaznamovan kot morilec. Poleg grobega kršenja vseh mogočih kazenskih določil je črn madež postopka ta, da je moral Martin Uhernik svojo nedolžnost vseskozi dokazovati sam. Prizadeval si je za obnovitev postopka tako, da je sam zbiral nove dokaze in iskal nove podatke, ki bi sodišče prepričali, da on ni storilec kaznivega dejanja umora, za katerega je bil obsojen. Prvo zahtevo je vložil že junija 2001, vendar je bila zavržena s strani novomeškega okrožnega sodišča. Zahtevo je kasneje zavrglo tudi Višje sodišče v Ljubljani, leta 2005 pa je Vrhovno sodišče v Ljubljani končno odločilo, da je njegova zahteva o varstvu zakonitosti utemeljena. Analiza preiskave je pokazala, da vedno ni najbolje zaključiti preiskave »za vsako ceno«. Ker se je to zgodilo že dobra tri desetletja nazaj, menim, da danes tovrstnih napak sistem ne dopušča več.
Keywords:	kazniva dejanja, umori, preiskovanje, kriminalistika, napake, analiza primera, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:	[Ljubljana
Publisher:	J. Guzelj]
Year of publishing:	2012
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-36971
UDC:	343.98:343.611
COBISS.SI-ID:	2470378
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:GFMLOLNC
Publication date in DKUM:	22.10.2012
Views:	2321
Downloads:	378
Metadata:
Categories:	FVV
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:

English

Abstract:

This diploma work covers the theoretical basis of the investigation of murders-the first actions of the investigators, when someone finds a dead body to the final steps needed to detect the real offender. In order to make an investigation successful and effective, however requires a good organizational approach of investigators and some of the skills, knowledge and skills of investigators who contribute to the successful conclusion of the case. For each of these steps that are necessary for successful completion of the investigation, there is the possibility of errors. Some of the errors in the theoretical work are presented, the more so as they are reflected in the empirical part, where the error occurred on the event, which took place in Slovenia. With the file I will analyze the investigation, which was held at the murder in the region of dolenjska. In this case there were committed many mistakes, which is why an innocent man spent eight years in prison, away from his wife and two young children. This has left a big mark on his life as the children grew up without a father, moreover, was marked for a lifetime as a murderer. In addition to gross violations of all sorts of criminal provisions, the black stain of procedure is that Martin Uhernik had constantly prove his innocence alone. He worked for the renewal of case by gathering new evidence and searching for new information that would convince the court that he has not committed the crime of murder for which he was convicted. The first request was filed in June 2001 but was dismissed by the Novo mesto district court. The request was later dismissed also by the High Court in Ljubljana, and in 2005 the Supreme Court in Ljubljana finally decided that his request for protection of legality is justified. Analysis of the investigation showed that it is not always best to complete the investigation "at all costs." Since this has happened already three decades ago, I believe that system nowadays does not allow that kind of mistakes anymore.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back