| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:INOVIRANJE NA PODROČJU GRADNJE PODZEMNIH HIŠ OBRAVNAVANO Z VIDIKA CENOVNE UPRAVIČENOSTI
Authors:ID Zapušek, David (Author)
ID Ženko, Zdenka (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Zapusek_David_2012.pdf (1,45 MB)
MD5: C0669F62A3EA6FECE71C55EAA8A35126
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/b55340dc-0363-41bb-9bed-30a21054b77a
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Final seminar paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:V svoji diplomski nalogi sem se posvetil predstavitvi razvoja miselnega procesa od ideje do inovacije, podrobno opisal pojme invencija, difuzija, inovacija in na praktičnem primeru prikazal, kako inovacije vplivajo na sodobno energetsko, okoljsko, trajnostno ter človeku prijazno učinkovito gradnjo podzemnih hiš. Zaradi pomanjkanja prostora, povečanja števila prebivalstva, draženja surovin in zmanjševanja realnih plač srednjega delavskega razreda se povečuje želja po cenejšem, a enako kakovostnem bivanju. Ker okolju prijazni objekti načeloma predstavljajo dražjo začetno investicijo, se ljudje še vedno množično odločajo za preizkušeno klasično gradnjo. V svoji nalogi sem z ekonomskega vidika podal realno oceno, da je podzemna hiša prijazna do okolja, ljudi, nudi kakovosten bivalni prostor in je za cca 23% cenejša v fazi gradnje. V fazi obratovanja je primerljiva s pasivnimi hišami in občutno (za cca 80%) varčnejša od klasičnih varčnih hiš. Pri vzdrževanju podzemne hiše privarčujemo v primerjavi s klasično varčno hišo cca 45% v 50-letnem časovnem obdobju, saj je treba pri klasični hiši zamenjati veliko več stvari kot pri podzemni(ne upoštevaje časovno vrednost denarja).S spodbujanjem tovrstnih gradenj bi naša družba pridobila na naslednjih področjih: manjša zazidava kmetijskih površin,pomanjkanje prostora, uporaba trajnih materialov,nepotrebnost običajnih temeljev, manjša poraba materiala, manj delovne sile pri izgradnji objekta, trajnostno lep naravni izgled hiše, manjše plačilo davkov zaradi varčnosti in ekološkega učinka objekta, toplo pozimi, hladno poleti, možnost lepega pogleda, možnost postavitve visoke grede na strehi (pridelava vrtnin, toplotni izolator), grajena iz ekoloških materialov (neoporečni do okolja), povečuje dvoriščni prostor, zavetje pred močnimi padavinami, vetrovi in naravnimi katastrofami (burja, potres), zaščita pred radioaktivnim sevanjem, varno pred vlomilci, skrito (nudi zasebnost), ponekod bližje izviru vode (možnost samooskrbe), delno varno pred ognjem, zaščita cevi pred zmrzaljo, vrhunska tla za sajenje rastlin, relativno lahka izvedba, vodoodporno bivališče, zvočno izolirano, manj vzdrževanja, za 80%nižji stroški ogrevanja, nepotrebnost klimatske naprave. Zaradi vseh naštetih razlogov bi lahko podzemna hiša postala resnejša alternativa pri odločanju ljudi za novo gradnjo.
Keywords:Inovacija, invencija, inovacijski proces, tipi inovacij, trajnostne gradnje, trajnostno javno naročanje, dolgoročna in kratkoročna vizija, neto sedanja vrednost, doba povračila, stroški življenjskega kroga, cenovna primerjava enodružinske klasične in podzemne hiše.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[D. Zapušek]
Year of publishing:2012
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-37072 New window
UDC:001.895
COBISS.SI-ID:11263004 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:HODGDKAN
Publication date in DKUM:12.12.2012
Views:3339
Downloads:233
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:EPF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:INNOVATING OF BUILDING OF UNDERGROUND HOMES RESEARCHED FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF PRICE EFFICIENCY
Abstract:In my diploma thesis, I focused on presentation of the development of the thought processes from idea innovation, described details the concept of invention, diffusion, innovation, and on a practical example show, how innovations affect the modern energy, environmental, sustainable and efficient human-friendly building underground houses. Due to scarcity of for construction suitable areas, growing of population, growing prices of raw materials and reducing the real wages of the working middle class, increases the desire for cheaper but not less quality things. Because environmentally friendly facilities in principle represent a costly initial investment, people are still massively deciding for proven conventional construction. In my project I made from an economic point of view a realistic assessment of the underground house for the environment, people, offer a quality living space and is about 23% cheaper in the construction phase. In the operation phase it is comparable to passive houses and much more economical than conventional fuel-efficient houses for about 80%. In the maintenance of underground house savings compared to conventional energy-saving house about 45% in 50 years time, because it is necessary to replace in the traditional house many more things than at the underground house (not taking into account the time value of money). By promoting these underground houses to our society, our society would achieve the following benefits: lower walling of agricultural land, lack of space, use of durable materials, no need of conventional foundations, lower consumption of materials, less labour to build the facility, a beautiful natural look of a sustainable house, pay less taxes due to economy and ecological impact of building warm in winter, cold in summer, beautiful view option, the option of installing the high beams on the roof (the vegetables, heat insulator), built of organic materials (not harmful to the environment) increases the courtyard space, shelter from the heavy rainfall, winds and natural disasters (wind, earthquake), protection against ionizing radiation is safe from burglars, a hidden (providing privacy), sometimes closer to the source of water (the possibility of self-sufficiency), partially protected from the fire, protecting the pipes from freezing, top soil for planting, relatively easy to implement, waterproof housing, sound insulated, less maintenance, lower heating costs by 80%, lack of need for air conditioning. For all the reasons, underground house could become a serious alternative for people deciding to underground house.
Keywords:Innovation, invention, innovation process, type of innovation, sustainable construction, sustainable procurement, long-term and short-term vision, net present value, pay-back period, life cycle costs, the price comparison of single-family classic and underground house


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica