| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Translation of Swearwords in Literary Autobiographies: The Case of Miles Davis
Authors:ID Praprotnik, Matjaž (Author)
ID Gadpaille, Michelle (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Praprotnik_Matjaz_2012.pdf (353,40 KB)
MD5: DB3713A3644F70698ACCD5C059FA80E7
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/47f7271a-bd26-4a7d-a7eb-d1058f98d132
 
Language:English
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:My thesis focuses on swearwords in the autobiography of Miles Davis. I define them, explain their function and compare swearwords in the original and the translation. My attempt was to argue the appropriateness of the translation and I used the dictionary of Slovene language (SSKJ) and results from the corpora Fidaplus to provide support for my claims. Context and connotation were among the most important criteria, since these often ruled out a literal translation because they are not used in the same manner in Slovene as in English. A deeper analysis was done on three swearwords: motherfucker, nigger and bitch. The first represents the most difficult challenge for the translator, because it is used in several different ways and can take on numerous functions. A translation for the word does not exist; therefore, the translator had to find several other translation solutions. The analysis has shown that the translator tried to keep one translation solution per function of the word, e.g., pizdun when the word was used to refer to people, and pizdarija when the referent was an object or a situation. However, translating motherfucker often demanded a certain degree of creativity from the translator because it was also used to refer to women or even Davis’ own father, as a means for comparison and as an adjective. It is difficult to find consistent solutions in these cases; therefore, the translator had to adapt his translation to individual cases. Nigger itself was not as challenging as the previous word, because črnuh has already been established as a prototypical translation in Slovene. Albeit several possible translations, e.g. mrha, kuzla, prasica, pička, translations for bitch still raised doubts in some cases. Connotations were of key importance in this case, because they had to match the original, where they could either be positive, negative or neutral. Kuzla was inappropriate in some cases, because it is always used with negative connotations in Slovene; however, mrha is used with all three connotation possibilities and therefore seems to be the most appropriate translation. Generally, I found that translating swearwords is difficult because swearing relies strongly on the originating culture, and each culture is marked by different characteristics; these characteristics, in particular, represent a challenge for the translator.
Keywords:translation, swearwords, Miles Davis, autobiography, connotation, context
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[M. Praprotnik]
Year of publishing:2012
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-37773 New window
UDC:811.111:(043.2):81ʼ25
COBISS.SI-ID:19484168 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:YAA65FYC
Publication date in DKUM:14.11.2012
Views:2194
Downloads:120
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Prevajanje kletvic v avtobiografiji Milesa Davisa
Abstract:V svoji diplomski nalogi sem se osredinil na kletvice v avtobiografiji Milesa Davisa, jih poskušal opredeliti in pojasniti njihovo funkcijo; v analizi sem primerjal kletvice v izvirniku s tistimi v prevodu. Pri argumentiranju ustreznosti prevoda sem si pomagal s Slovarjem slovenskega knjižnega jezika in se tudi skliceval na rezultate, do katerih sem prišel z iskanjem po korpusu Fidaplus. Pomemben kriterij sta predstavljala kontekst in konotacija, ki sta velikokrat izločila dobesedni prevod, saj se ta v slovenščini uporablja drugače kot angleščini. Podrobneje sem analiziral tri kletvice: motherfucker, nigger in bitch. Prva je predstavljala največjo težavo za prevajalca, saj se v izvirniku uporablja na številne načine in nastopa v mnogih funkcijah. Prevoda za njo v slovenščini ni, tako je moral prevajalec seči po drugih besedah, s katerimi je iskal ustreznice. Ugotovil sem, da se je prevajalec trudil obdržati en prevod glede na funkcijo besede v izvirniku, npr. pizdun, kadar je šlo za moškega ali ljudi na splošno, ali pizdarija, kadar se je beseda navezovala na predmete, situacije. Vendar pa je v veliko primerih prevod kletvice motherfucker zahteval prevajalčevo kreativnost, kajti uporabljena je bila za ženske, za primerjavo in tudi v funkciji pridevnika. V vseh teh primerih je težko obdržati konstantne prevode in tako je prevajalec moral rešitve prilagajati posameznim primerom. Beseda nigger ni predstavljala takšnega izziva, saj se je v slovenščini že ustalil prevod črnuh, ki ga je uporabil tudi prevajalec. Bitch pa je kljub številnim možnim prevodom, npr. mrha, kuzla, prasica, pička ipd., vseeno povzročala težave in dvome v določene prevajalske rešitve. Konotacija je bila tukaj ključnega pomena, saj je ta morala v prevodu ustrezati izvirniku, v slednjem pa je ta lahko bila tako pozitivna kot tudi negativna ali nevtralna. Kuzla tako ni ustrezala v vseh prevodih, saj je ta v slovenščini vedno negativno konotirana, mrho pa najdemo v vseh treh konotacijah in je po teh kriterijih najbolje ustrezala prevodu. Na splošno sem ugotovil, da je prevajanje kletvic težavno, kajti preklinjanje je v veliki meri vezano na kulturo, iz katere izhaja, vsaka kultura pa je zaznamovana s posebnostmi in ravno te posebnosti predstavljajo velik izziv za prevajalca.
Keywords:prevajanje, kletvice, Miles Davis, avtobiografija, konotacija, kontekst


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica