VREDNOTENJE FORENZIČNIH DOKAZOV V PRAKSI SLOVENSKIH SODIŠČ

Klevišar, Jasna

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	VREDNOTENJE FORENZIČNIH DOKAZOV V PRAKSI SLOVENSKIH SODIŠČ
Authors:	ID Klevišar, Jasna (Author) ID Maver, Darko (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Klevisar_Jasna_2012.pdf (985,72 KB) MD5: 4F19CF420E3E77C09C8BADC07F6B2204 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/ff299388-6f5e-435c-ba45-00449533fec9
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	T.i. CSI efekt in slovenski medijsko odmevni primeri so na laični javnosti pustili vtis, da sodišča strokovnih mnenj Nacionalnega forenzičnega laboratorija ne upoštevajo, ter da forenzični strokovnjaki svojega dela ne opravijo dovolj strokovno. Razne TV nadaljevanke so pustile vtis, da forenzični strokovnjak npr. najdene prstne sledi naloži v računalnik ter malce počaka, da mu le-ta ponudi odgovor oz. pozitivno individualno identifikacijo. Vendar je prikazano delo forenzičnega strokovnjaka v nadaljevankah večinoma zelo daleč od resnice. Namen diplomskega dela je bralca preko prikaza sodne prakse popeljati skozi težave in dejavnike s katerimi so se soočali forenzični dokazi oz. forenzični strokovnjaki v fazi sojenja, in ki so vplivali na to, da slovenska sodišča niso pripisovala forenzičnemu dokazu takšne dokazne vrednosti, kot jo ima danes. Poleg tega je namen raziskati ali so še vedno prisotne, glede na to, da obstajajo različni forenzični dokazi, ki jih lahko razdelimo glede na to ali je forenzični strokovnjak do njih prišel preko subjektivne ali analitske metode, razlike v njihovi dokazni vrednosti pred sodiščem.
Keywords:	forenzični dokaz, forenzični strokovnjak, izvedenec, izvedensko mnenje, vrednotenje dokazov, dokazna vrednost, Nacionalni forenzični laboratorij, sodna praksa
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[J. Klevišar]
Year of publishing:	2012
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-37921
UDC:	34(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	4409387
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:XF1J8UBI
Publication date in DKUM:	14.09.2012
Views:	2546
Downloads:	505
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	EVALUATION OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE IN SLOVENE JUDICATURE
Abstract:	The so-called CSI effect and Slovenian media high-profile cases left the impression that the courts ignores the opinions of the National Forensic Laboratory at the general public, and that the forensic examiners don’t perform their work enough professional. Various TV series have left the impression that forensic examiner for example founds traces of papillary lines and loads it into the computer and wait a bit for answer or more precisely positive individual identification. However, the forensic examiner work in the movie series is mostly shown very far from the truth. The purpose of this diploma paper is to shown reader through court practice the problems and factors which forensic evidence and forensic experts had to face at the trial stage, and which have influenced on the fact that Slovenian courts haven’t attributed the forensic evidence of such probative value as it has today. Moreover, it is also intention to investigate whether they are still present, according to that different forensic evidences exist, which can be divided considering if the forensic examiner gets them through subjective or analytical method, differences in evidence value before court of justice.
Keywords:	forensic evidence, forensic examiner, expert, evaluation of forensic evidence, evidence value, National Forensic Laboratory, court practice

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back