| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Analiza funkcionalnosti programa RAA (Risk assessment accelerator) : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Primc, Žiga (Author)
ID Bernik, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Primc_Ziga_2012.pdf (6,23 MB)
MD5: 9FBB371F68AA85CE72FEB38A5C3979E5
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/1a40d9f7-dff4-4b39-8171-6deef30333e1
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Izdelava ocene ogroženosti je danes v podjetjih ena ključnih nalog, saj na ugotovitvah ocene vodstvo organizacije snuje odločitve. Ker je čas eden pomembnejših dobrin v poslovnem svetu je pomembna tudi hitrost dela, zato poznamo danes številna orodja za izdelavo ocene tveganja, ki izdelavo poenostavijo in pospešijo. Dve orodji, ki to omogočata sta RAA (Risk Assessment Accelerator) in ARAT (Astec Risk Assessment Tool) slovenskih podjetij Netis d.o.o. in Astec d.o.o. Diplomska naloga je sestavljena iz dveh delov, kjer je prvi teoretični drugi pa praktični del. V prvem je bila pregledana domača in tuja literatura na področju upravljanja s tveganji, analize tveganja, standardih o informacijski varnosti, orodjih za izdelavo ocene ogroženosti in drugo. V drugem delu smo napravili pregled funkcionalnosti in orodji med sabo primerjali, kar je pokazalo prednosti in slabosti obeh orodij ter posledično področja katera bi bilo možno izboljšati. Namen in cilji diplomske naloge so bili doseženi, kot tudi potrjene vse tri predpostavke. Aplikaciji smo primerjali v štirih kategorijah, ki so uporabniška prijaznost, vizualni izgled, dostopnost aplikacije in funkcije aplikacije. Rezultati so podani na tabelarni način, po vnaprej določeni kriterijski lestvici, opravili pa smo tudi SWOT analizo obeh orodij. Tako RAA kot ARAT sta primera kvalitetnega izdelka, ki pa imata še prostora za izboljšave. Namen diplomske naloge ni iskati napake, ampak možnosti za izboljšave omenjenih orodij.
Keywords:organizacije, tveganja, upravljanje s tveganji, ocena tveganja, programi, diplomske naloge, Risk assessment acelerator, RAA
Place of publishing:[Ljubljana
Publisher:Ž. Primc]
Year of publishing:2012
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-37922 New window
UDC:005.934:004
COBISS.SI-ID:2459626 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:DBAEN9UI
Publication date in DKUM:11.10.2012
Views:2333
Downloads:236
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:Risk assessment is now one of the key tasks in enterprises, because senior management uses the evaluation findings to plan their decisions. Since time is one of the most important assets in the business world as well as the speed of work, today we know a number of tools for risk assessment, which simplify and speed up production. Two tools that make this possible are the RAA (Risk Assessment Accelerator) and ARAT (Astec Risk Assessment Tool) from Slovenian companies Netis Ltd. and Astec Ltd.. The thesis is composed of two parts where the first is theoretical and the other is practical. In first part domestic and foreign literature was reviewed in the field of risk management, risk analysis, standards on information security, tools for making threat assessments, and more. In the second part we have taken a review of the functionality and tools compared to each other, showing the advantages and disadvantages of both and, consequently, areas which could be improved. The purpose and objectives of the thesis have been achieved, as well as all three hypotesis confirmed. Applications were compared in four categories, which are: user friendly, visual appearance, accessibility of the applications and application features. Results are presented in tabular mode, a pre-specified criterion scale. We also conducted a SWOT analysis of the two tools. So RAA as well as ARAT are examples of high-quality product, but still have room for improvement. The purpose of the thesis is not to find faults, but the potential for improvement of these tools.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica