| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:AKTUALNA VPRAŠANJA INSTITUTA ODPOVEDI S PONUDBO NOVE POGODBE O ZAPOSLITVI
Authors:ID Križman, Nina (Author)
ID Senčur Peček, Darja (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Krizman_Nina_2012.pdf (914,97 KB)
MD5: 6492D39172F2401627E7961780A27CD2
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/4a906503-1a27-43b5-ad0c-0cf60fb35b6d
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Pravna ureditev prenehanja pogodbe o zaposlitvi izhaja iz temeljnega načela, po katerem je odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi s strani delodajalca ukrep ultima ratio. V luči spoštovanja tega načela Zakon o delovnih razmerjih (ZDR) določa posebno obveznost delodajalca, da v primeru redne odpovedi pogodbe o zaposlitvi iz poslovnega razloga ali razloga nesposobnosti preveri možnosti za ohranitev delavčeve zaposlitve. Če pri delodajalcu obstaja druga ustrezna zaposlitev, jo mora delavcu ponuditi hkrati z odpovedjo pogodbe o zaposlitvi. V primeru, da s takšno zaposlitvijo delodajalec ne razpolaga, pa lahko delavcu ponudi novo pogodbo za neustrezno zaposlitev. To bo delodajalec izvedel s posebnim delovnopravnim institutom odpovedi s ponudbo nove pogodbe o zaposlitvi, ki je urejen v tretjem in četrtem odstavku 88. člena in v 90. členu ZDR. Institut združuje redno odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi in ponudbo za sklenitev nove pogodbe o zaposlitvi. Delavec lahko ponudbo sprejme ali jo zavrne, temu ustrezno so predpisane tudi pravne posledice. Pravne posledice sprejema oziroma zavrnitve ponudbe za sklenitev nove pogodbe o zaposlitvi pa so odvisne od tega, ali se ponudba nanaša na ustrezno ali neustrezno zaposlitev. Ureditev obravnavanega instituta se je izkazala za neustrezno in pomanjkljivo. Glavna dilema se nanaša na obseg sodnega varstva, ki pripada delavcu v primeru sprejetja delodajalčeve ponudbe in podpisa nove pogodbe o zaposlitvi. Po sedanji ureditvi ima takšen delavec ožji obseg sodnega varstva, kot ga sicer imajo delavci, če uveljavljajo nezakonitost odpovedi pogodbe o zaposlitvi. Predlagane spremembe ZDR odpravljajo bistveno problematiko obravnavanega instituta, vseeno pa še ostajajo nekatera odprta vprašanja.
Keywords:prenehanje pogodbe o zaposlitvi, pravni viri, redna odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi, ponudba za sklenitev nove pogodbe o zaposlitvi, nezakonitost odpovedi pogodbe o zaposlitvi, sodno varstvo, sodna praksa.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[N. Križman]
Year of publishing:2012
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-39236 New window
UDC:349.222(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4478507 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:B8LHUOG3
Publication date in DKUM:09.01.2013
Views:4116
Downloads:353
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:TOPICAL ISSUES REGARDING NOTICE OF TERMINATION BY OFFERING A NEW EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
Abstract:Legal regulation of the termination of the employment contract is derived from the fundamental principle, by which the termination of the employment contract by the employer is an ultima ratio measure. In the light of this principle the Employment Relationships Act stipulates a special obligation of the employer that in case of terminating the employment contract for reasons of incapacity or for a business reason, the employer must check whether it is possible to employ the worker under changed conditions or in other work, and/or whether it is possible to additionally train the worker for the work he carries out or to retrain the worker for other work. If the employer has other appropriate employment, which he can offer to the worker, the conclusion of a new employment contract must be offered to the worker simultaneously with the termination of the current employment contract. If such employment is unavailable, the employer may offer the worker a new employment contract for unsuitable employment. This is done by a special labor law institute – Notice of Termination by Offering a New Employment Contract, as provided by third and fourth paragraph of Article 88th and the 90th Article of the Employment Relationships Act. This institute fuses the ordinary termination of the employment contract with the offer for a conclusion of a new employment contract. The worker can either accept the offer or decline it. Accordingly, legal consequences are prescribed. Legal consequences of the acceptance or refusal of the offer for a conclusion of a new employment contract depend on the fact whether the offer by the employer was made for an appropriate or an inappropriate employment. The regulation of this institute has proven to be inappropriate and insufficient. The main dilemma refers to the extent of the Judicial Protection worker is entitled to when accepting employer's offer to conclude a new employment contract and signing it. In accordance with the current regulation, the scope of Judicial Protection such worker is entitled to is narrower than that of a worker, who enforces the illegality of the termination of the employment contract. The suggested changes to the Employment Relationships Act are abolishing the crucial issues of this special labor law institute, but still some questions remain unanswered.
Keywords:termination of an employment contract, legal sources, ordinary termination of an employment contract, offer of a new employment contract, illegality of the termination of an employment contract, judicial protection, case law.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica