| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:POSEST, PRIMERJALNO-PRAVNA ANALIZA (SRBIJA, ČRNA GORA, HRVAŠKA, MAKEDONIJA, BOSNA IN HERCEGOVINA)
Authors:ID Dimitrijević, Kristina (Author)
ID Vrenčur, Renato (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Dimitrijevic_Kristina_2013.pdf (208,75 KB)
MD5: 22BDCC0B3E734E866D7DF7A9F2AB43DD
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/f4014737-a53d-4c36-96da-5de5f1e48bd3
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Posest ni pravica, je dejanska oblast nad stvarjo. Že v rimskem pravu so poznali pojem posesti, ki so ga definirali po subjektivni koncepciji posesti. Tako je za pridobitev posesti bilo potrebno izpolniti dva pogoja, in sicer imeti dejansko oblast nad stvarjo in voljo posedovati stvar kot svojo. Srbija, Črna Gora, Hrvaška, Makedonija ter Bosna in Hercegovina so nekoč bile del SFRJ in takrat je bila enotna stvarnopravno ureditev z zveznim zakonom (ZTLR), ki je veljal v vseh državah članicah bivše SFRJ. Po osamosvojitvi so države sprejele nove zakone, s katerim so uredile stvarnopravna razmerja. Srbija je izdelala predlog zakonika, vendar pa je v uporabi še vedno ZTLR. Primerjalno-pravna analiza omenjenih držav kaže, da imajo podobno ureditev posesti. Po objektivni koncepciji posesti, ki so jo sprejele vse obravnavane ureditve, je posest definirana kot dejanska oblast nad stvarjo. Mogoča pa je tudi posest pravice, in sicer posest stvarne služnosti. Države se med seboj najbolj razlikujejo pri priposestvovanju in varstvu posesti. Na preostalih področjih posesti, kot na primer vrste posesti, pridobitev in izguba, dedovanje posesti, so si ureditve držav podobne, z izjemo predloga zakonika Srbije, kateri se od vseh držav najbolj razlikuje.
Keywords:posest, stvarno pravo, SFRJ, priposestvovanje, varstvo posesti
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[K. Dimitrijević]
Year of publishing:2013
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-39737 New window
UDC:347.25(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4512043 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:K8FXDPE0
Publication date in DKUM:22.03.2013
Views:2755
Downloads:337
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:POSSESSION, COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS (SERBIA, CROATIA, MACEDONIA, MONTENEGRO, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA)
Abstract:Possession is not a right, it is the actual authority over an object. Already Roman law knew the concept of possession, which is defined by subjective concept of possession. Though, to obtain the possession it was necessary to fulfill two conditions, to have the actual authority over an object and will to possess it as your own. Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina were once part of Yugoslavia and back then has existed uniform property law's regulation by federal law (ZTLR), which was valid in all member states of the former Yugoslavia. After independence, member states adopted new laws, by which they established property law's relations. Serbia has made a code proposal, but for now ZTLR is still in use. A comparative-legal analysis of these countries shows they have a similar arrangement of possession. After objective conception of possession, which all the regulations have adopted, it’s defined as the actual control of an object. It is also possible to take possession of the right, namely the possession of objective servitude. The member states, among themselves, differ most in prescription and protection of possession. In the remaining areas of the possession, as an example types of possession, acquisition and loss, inheriting the possessions, the member states have similar arrangements, with the exception of the code proposal of Serbia, which the most differs from other member states.
Keywords:possession, property law, Yugoslavia, prescription, protection of possession


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica