| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:MEDDRŽAVNO SODIŠČE V HAAGU
Authors:ID Žohar, Klavdija (Author)
ID Tratnik, Matjaž (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Zohar_Klavdija_2013.pdf (467,43 KB)
MD5: 43DBD9345BDC720E42E97FF8D5573847
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/9a3272df-f682-4485-99c5-e5b1b8990748
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Meddržavno sodišče v Haagu predstavlja enega temeljnih sredstev za reševanje sporov med državami. Sodišče je bilo ustanovljeno leta 1945 kot naslednik Stalnega meddržavnega sodišča in ima položaj enega poglavitnih organov Organizacije združenih narodov. Temeljni akti, ki urejajo njegovo delovanje, so Ustanovna listina Združenih narodov, Statut Meddržavnega sodišča v Haagu ter njegov poslovnik. Sodišče sestavlja petnajst neodvisnih sodnikov, izglasovanih s strani Generalne skupščine in Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov. Njegovi temeljni funkciji sta reševanje sporov med državami, katere lahko sodišče rešuje zgolj na podlagi soglasja strank, ter izdajanje svetovalnih mnenj na zahtevo organizacij. Medtem ko imajo izdane sodne odločbe zavezujoč učinek in jih je mogoče tudi prisilno izvršiti s strani Varnostnega sveta, je namen svetovalnih mnenj v nudenju nasvetov nezavezujoče narave. Sodišče se je v času svojega delovanja izkazalo za zelo učinkovito in primerno sredstvo za reševanje sporov med državami, s svojimi odločitvami pa je tudi močno pripomoglo k razvoju mednarodnega prava. Kljub njegovemu uspešnemu, že več desetletij trajajočemu delovanju, pa se v njegovi ureditvi še vedno pojavljajo določene pomanjkljivosti in dileme, ki bi jih bilo potrebno zaradi še učinkovitejšega delovanja odpraviti.
Keywords:ICJ, Meddržavno sodišče v Haagu, PCIJ, reševanje sporov med državami, sodbe, Stalno meddržavno sodišče, Statut Meddržavnega sodišča, svetovalna mnenja.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[K. Žohar]
Year of publishing:2013
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-40293 New window
UDC:341.6(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4530987 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:1BRHZATF
Publication date in DKUM:14.05.2013
Views:6779
Downloads:798
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Abstract:International Court of Justice represents one of the fundemental tools by which conflicts between countries can be solved. The Court was established in 1945 as the successor of the Permanent Court of Justice and it represents one of the principal organs of the Organization of the United Nations. The fundemental acts that regulate the functioning of the Court are Charter of the United Nations, Statute of the International Court of Justice and Rules of Court. The Court is composed of fifteen independent judges elected by the General Assembly and the Security Council of the United Nations. The Court embodies two essential, fundamental functions. Solving conflicts between countries represents the first one; the Court acts only when the consent of the parties involved is given. The second major function is issuing advisory opinions when required by accredited organisations. When, comparising, the judicial decisions of the Court have a binding effect and can be thus enforced by Security Council, the purpose of advisory opinions of the Court are those of a non-binding nature. In the time of its functioning the Court has proven extremely efficient and appropriate tool when solving different conflicts between countries emerge. The decisions of the International Court in The Hague has proven a great help in the development of the international law. Some shortcomings and dilemmas still occure no matter of several decades long functioning of the Court. Those should be eliminated in course of some period in order to improve the functioning and operating of the Court.
Keywords:advisory opinions, contentious cases, ICJ, International Court of Justice, judgements, PCIJ, Permanent Court of Justice, Statute of the International Court of Justice


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica