| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Napačna priznanja : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija
Authors:ID Rus, Kaja (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Rus_Kaja_2013.pdf (355,19 KB)
MD5: B126A2F07A9FB389497416F97BC0111B
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Priznanje nosi veliko težo v kazenskem postopku, saj močno vpliva na odločitev sodnikov in porote o krivdi posameznika. Prav zato je pomembno, da se odločevalci v sodnem procesu soočijo z vprašanjem resničnosti priznanja. V zadnjih letih so se raziskave na področju napačnih priznanj močno razširile, kar nam omogoča podroben vpogled v dejavnike, ki vplivajo na napačna priznanja. Dejavnika, ki imata največ vpliva na napačno priznanje, sta starost in motnje v duševnem razvoju. Oba vplivata na osumljenčevo zmožnost razumevanja svojih pravic, ki naj bi ga ščitile pred prekomernimi pritiski preiskovalcev. Razlogi za napačna priznanja so različni, na podlagi katerih ločimo posamezne tipe napačnih priznanj, in sicer prostovoljno, izsiljeno ter ponotranjeno napačno priznanje. Velik vpliv na napačna priznanja imajo tudi preiskovalci, posebej z izbiro tehnike zaslišanj. Med najbolj vprašljive tehnike zaslišanja spada Reidova tehnika, saj preiskovalci priznanje skušajo pridobiti s pomočjo psiholoških manipulacij in preslepitve. Poleg tega ne obstajajo nobeni empirični dokazi, ki bi potrjevali učinkovitost Reidove tehnike in ocenjevali vpliv te tehnike na nedolžne osumljence ter pridobitev napačnega priznanja. Ker so napačna priznanja večdimenzionalne narave, ne obstaja preprosta rešitev, ki bi preprečila napačna priznanja. Strokovnjaki predlagajo, da bi snemanje celotnih zaslišanj zmanjšalo število napačnih priznanj, saj so v tem primeru osumljenci zaščiteni pred prevelikimi pritiski preiskovalcev, preiskovalci pa bi se izognili obtožbam, da je osumljenec priznal zaradi njihovih pritiskov.
Keywords:kazniva dejanja, storilci, preiskovanje, zaslišanje, priznanje, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:[Ljubljana
Publisher:K. Rus]
Year of publishing:2013
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-41085 New window
UDC:159.9:340.6(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:2651114 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:KHTQT3AX
Publication date in DKUM:03.10.2013
Views:1898
Downloads:173
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:Given that confession has a strong influence on decisions of judges and juries in establishing the guilt of an individual, confession evidence is highly potent in criminal proceedings. It is therefore important that decision-makers face the question of reality of the confession in judicial process. In recent years, research on false confessions has greatly expanded, allowing us a detailed insight into the factors which influence false confessions. Factors that have the most impact on false confessions are age and mental disorder. They both affect the suspect’s ability to understand their rights, which are supposed to protect them against excessive pressure of investigators. There are various causes of false confessions, based on which we distinguish different types of false confessions: voluntary, compliant and internalized. Investigators have a significant impact on false confessions, particularly through the choice of the interrogation technique. One of the most questionable interrogation techniques is the Reid technique, since investigators are trying to obtain a confession through psychological manipulation and deception. In addition, there is no empirical data that would support the effectiveness of the Reid technique and evaluates the impact of this technique on innocent suspects and obtaining a false confession. Since false confessions are multidimensional in their nature, there is no simple solution to avoid them. Experts suggest that recordings of entire interrogations could reduce the number of false confessions, because suspects are protected against excessive pressure of investigators. This would also allow investigators to avoid accusations of confessions made under-pressure.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica