| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:ANALIZA ORODIJ ZA PODPORO K PROJEKTNEMU DELU
Authors:ID Zajec, Klemen (Author)
ID Kern, Tomaž (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Zajec_Klemen_2013.pdf (5,17 MB)
MD5: E5C4233F98CCC17B41ECCB3582861F3E
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
Abstract:Problem, ki ga obravnavamo v diplomskem delu, je, da so posamezna orodja za projektno vodenje preprosto prevelik strošek za podjetja. Zato smo primerjali različna orodja za projektno vodenje in izbrali tisto, ki se v svoji funkcionalnosti najbolj približa vodilnemu na tem področju; Mircosoft Projectu. Izpostavili smo najpomembnejše kriterije Microsoft Projecta in preko njih našli podobna orodja. Po izdelavi pilotnega projekta smo izbrana orodja primerjali med sabo in preučili njihove prednosti in slabosti. Kot rešitev smo izbrali eno izmed orodij, ki je po našem mnenju najboljši približek Microsoft Projecta. S preizkušanjem in analiziranjem smo opazili trende, s katerimi se bodo orodja za projektno vodenje še bolj približala projektnim skupinam.
Keywords:Projekt, Projektno vodenje, Orodja za podporo projektnemu vodenju, Kriteriji izbire orodij
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2013
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-41381 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:7207443 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:QBWKQLFJ
Publication date in DKUM:20.09.2013
Views:1686
Downloads:213
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FOV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:ANALYSES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS
Abstract:The discussed problem in this thesis is that individual tools for project management are too great an expense for companies. That is why we compared several tools for project management and selected the one which is in its functionality the closest to the leading product in this field; Microsoft Project. We pointed out the most important criteria of Microsoft Project and, according to these criteria, found similar tools. After creating a pilot project, we compared selected tools and studied their strengths and weaknesses. As a result, we selected one of the tools which in our opinion compares the most to Microsoft Project. By testing and analysing, we noticed trends which will bring tools for project management even closer to project groups.
Keywords:Project, Project management, Project management support tools, Tools selection criteria


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica