PROBLEMATIKA DOKAZOVANJA GOSPODARSKIH KAZNIVIH DEJANJ

Novak, Antonio

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	PROBLEMATIKA DOKAZOVANJA GOSPODARSKIH KAZNIVIH DEJANJ
Authors:	ID Novak, Antonio (Author) ID Dežman, Zlatan (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Novak_Antonio_2014.pdf (525,83 KB) MD5: 7637ED41B4A42EE71BE37107DE4B8742
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Diplomsko delo obravnava problematiko dokazovanja gospodarskih kaznivih dejanj, ki spadajo v pojem gospodarske kriminalitete. V uvodnem delu so tako predstavljene nekatere kriminološke teorije, ki se nanašajo nanjo in razmerje med gospodarsko kriminaliteto in kriminologijo ter kazenskim pravom. Nato je obravnavan sam pojem gospodarskega kaznivega dejanja v kontekstu splošnih elementov kaznivih dejanj. Poseben poudarek je namenjen elementom objektivnega pogoja kaznivosti, materialne protipravnosti in krivde, saj imajo slednji svoje specifike na področju gospodarskih kaznivih dejanj, kar pomembno vpliva tudi na njihovo dokazovanje. Dokazni postopek je po svoji logični zgradbi zahtevno procesnopravno opravilo, ki združuje uporabo dejanskih ugotovitev iz zunanjega materialnega sveta ter uporabo procesnih pravil in materialnega (kazenskega) prava na slednje. Pri tem se v okviru gospodarskih kaznivih dejanj pojavljajo določene posebnosti v odnosu do dokazovanja njihovih temeljnih elementov in zakonskih znakov posameznih kaznivih dejanj. Še posebej je v tem kontekstu aktualno pravilo proste podjetniške presoje in uporaba nekaterih ugotovitev civilnega prava, ki lahko kot tihe blanketne norme služijo predvsem v utemeljitev naklepa storilcev gospodarskih kaznivih dejanj, kar je pogosto izjemno težek element z vidika dokazovanja. Navedeno je v nadaljevanju diplomskega dela aplicirano in analizirano preko izbranih kaznivih dejanj, še posebej upoštevaje sodno prakso kot pogosto temeljnega in resničnega odraza ter analize uporabe zakonskih pravil v praksi.
Keywords:	gospodarsko kaznivo dejanje, formalno dokazovanje, povzročitev stečaja z goljufijo ali nevestnim poslovanjem, poslovna goljufija, zloraba položaja ali zaupanja pri gospodarski dejavnosti, pravilo proste podjetniške presoje, naklep, indici, posredno dokazovanje
Place of publishing:	Celje
Publisher:	[A. Novak]
Year of publishing:	2014
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-45092
UDC:	343.53(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	4760875
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:QFLC1BMW
Publication date in DKUM:	07.10.2014
Views:	2134
Downloads:	359
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	ISSUES IN PROVING ECONOMIC CRIME
Abstract:	The following work covers the issues in proving economic criminal acts, which are a part of the broader sphere of economic crime. In the beginning some of the criminological theories, which relate to the latter are presented, especially in the context of the relation between them, criminology and criminal law. Further on the concept of the economic criminal act is analysed in light of the general elements of criminal acts as a whole. Special emphasis is given to the objective condition of punishability, material unlawfulness and criminal culpability, as the latter have their own specifics in the field of economic criminal acts, which has an important impact in relation to their proving. The line of argument is namely a very delicate and complex logical and adjective law operation that combines the findings from the outside material world and the use of the adjective law and substantive law on the latter. In this context several specific issues arise in connection with the economic criminal acts, especially in proving the basic elements and statutory marks of specific economic criminal acts. In relation to this problem, the use of the business judgement rule and some of the related findings in the field of civil law can be of special use, as they can serve as blank legal norms for the purpose of substantiation of the criminal culpability, which is frequently a very difficult element of an economic criminal act to prove. In the continuation of this work the described issues are applied and analysed through the chosen criminal acts, with special consideration to the case law, which is usually the principal and fundamental reflection and analysis of the use of legal rules in practice.
Keywords:	economic criminal act, formal proving, business fraud, causing of bankruptcy with the use of fraud or negligent business practice, abuse of the capacity or trust at economic activity, business judgement rule, intent, indication, indirect proving

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back