STEKI KAZNIVIH DEJANJ V ZAPRTIH PROSTORIH ŽRTVE

Bezenšek, Tomaž

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	STEKI KAZNIVIH DEJANJ V ZAPRTIH PROSTORIH ŽRTVE
Authors:	ID Bezenšek, Tomaž (Author) ID Korošec, Damjan (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Bezensek_Tomaz_2014.pdf (1,31 MB) MD5: 46DB69368AEB0F768496837C6335D3F9
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Na splošno velja, da je lahko neko kaznivo dejanje izvršeno z enim storilčevim dejanjem, zaradi česar se posledično (če so za to izpolnjene materialne in procesne predpostavke) proti njem vodi sodni postopek. Prav tako pa lahko storilec z enim samim dejanjem izpolni zakonske znake več kaznivih dejanj (t. i. idealni stek kaznivih dejanj), oziroma izpolni zakonske znake več kaznivih dejanj v okoliščinah, zaradi katerih je potrebno, da se proti storilcu vodi enotni postopek ter izreče enotna kazen (t. i. realni stek kaznivih dejanj). Diplomsko delo povzema splošne značilnosti stekov kaznivih dejanj, njihovo umestitev v pravni sistem, ter njihov odnos do sorodnih pravnih institutov. Skladno z izbranim naslovom je poudarek dan predvsem razmeroma slabo raziskanemu področju situacij in primerov, v katerih se stek kaznivih dejanj izvrši v zaprtih prostorih žrtve, kot so na primer stanovanje, hotelska soba, počitniška hišica, itd.. V uvodnem diplomskega dela je na kratko s kriminološkega gledišča predstavljena kategorija kaznivega dejanja ter poleg nje kategoriji žrtve in storilca kaznivega dejanja, kot elementa, ki sta nujno potrebna pri vsakem kaznivem dejanju. V nadaljevanju diplomsko delo podrobneje razčlenja in shematsko prikazuje členitev stekov kaznivih dejanj, kot posebne, sui generis pojavne oblike kaznivih dejanj. Poleg tega opredeljuje kategorijo žrtvinih zaprtih prostorov, kot kraja izvršitve kaznivih dejanj, ki so bistveni predmet diplomskega dela. V osrednjem delu diplomskega dela je pozornost namenjena specifični pojavni obliki stekov kaznivih dejanj, natančneje primerom, ko so-le ti izvršeni v žrtvinih zaprtih prostorih, ter analizi, kako in zakaj se takšni primeri razlikujejo od klasičnih stekov kaznivih dejanj. Diplomsko delo obravnava tudi vprašanje, zakaj je zakonodajalec uzakonil nekatere nekonsistentnosti glede inkriminacije določenih kombinacij kaznivih dejanj, za katere je značilno, da do njih redoma prihaja v žrtvinih zaprtih prostorih. Izpelje določene ugotovitve in zaključke, zakaj je zakonodajalec posebej inkriminiral kombinacijo protipravnega vstopa in tatvine, ne pa drugih tovrstnih kombinacij kaznivih dejanj. V zaključnem delu pa diplomsko delo skozi načelo prepovedi ponovnega sojenja obravnava še način odmere in izreka kazenske sankcije storilcu kaznivih dejanj v steku, ter primerja ureditev tematike stekov oz. ekvivalentnih institutov v nekaterih drugih (tujih) pravnih redih.
Keywords:	Ključne besede: kaznivo dejanje, storilec kaznivega dejanja, žrtev kaznivega dejanja, zaprti prostori žrtve, stanovanje, stek, idealni stek, realni stek, navidezni stek, nadaljevano kaznivo dejanje, prepoved ponovnega sojenja, odmera kazni.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[T. Bezenšek]
Year of publishing:	2014
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-46273
UDC:	343.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	4803371
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:AROZHKCF
Publication date in DKUM:	18.12.2014
Views:	2209
Downloads:	603
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	CONCURRENCE OF OFFENSES ON THE VICTIM´S PREMISES
Abstract:	It can be said that a criminal offense may be committed in one of two ways. Either the offender’s single act violates a single statutory provision, for which the offender then answers before a court of law or in such a way that a single act committed by the offender actually violates several statutory provisions or the provisions of several different statutes simultaneously. This dissertation effectively summarizes general characteristics of cases in which there exists a concurrence of several offenses, the installation of such cases into the criminal legal system and explores their relationship to other similar legal institutes. In accordance with the chosen title and topic, special attention and emphasis are given to the relatively sparsely researched and regulated field of study of concurrence of offenses in which the offender commits said offenses on the victim’s premises. In the introductory part of this dissertation some attention is given to the definition and analysis of the terms victim and culprit of a criminal offense from a criminological viewpoint, as the two basic legal categories necessary for a criminal offense. The dissertation then proceeds to shed light on the structure and subdivision of concurrence of criminal offenses as a unique, sui generis criminal category. It further proceeds to analyze the category of victims’ premises, as the site where the concurrence of offenses the dissertation is concerned with is committed. In the central segment the dissertation then sets its’ focus upon the specifics of cases in which the concurrence of offenses is committed on the victims’ premises as well as the analysis of the why and how such cases differ from the general norm. It touches upon the question of why the legislative body has permitted certain inconsistencies in the incrimination of combinations of certain offenses which commonly occur on the victim’s premises. The dissertation proceeds to extrapolate certain conclusions regarding why the legislative body felt the need to specifically incriminate of combination of breaking-and-entering and theft, and not the need to incriminate other, similar combinations of offenses using the same method. In its’ final segments the dissertation proceeds to describe the methods and procedure the courts use in determining the sentence of a offender who has committed such offenses, as well as to analyze and compare concurrence of offenses and other similar criminal constructs in several different legal systems.
Keywords:	Keywords: criminal offense, concurrence of offenses, culprit, criminal offender, victim of a crime, victims’ premises, prohibition of double jeopardy, sentencing.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back