| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:RAZVOJ INDIVIDUALNE KAZENSKE ODGOVORNOSTI NAJVIŠJIH POLITIČNIH IN VOJAŠKIH PREDSTAVNIKOV V MEDNARODNEM PRAVU
Authors:ID Glazer, Tajda (Author)
ID Tratnik, Matjaž (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Glazer_Tajda_2014.pdf (1,08 MB)
MD5: 56755EBBE111675783B5AB77DE827FCF
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Temelji ureditve individualne kazenske odgovornosti najvišjih političnih in vojaških predstavnikov v mednarodnem pravu so bili postavljeni po II. svetovni vojni s sprejetjem Nürnberškega in Tokijskega statuta, kljub temu pa je k njenemu razvoju nedvoumno največ prispevala sodna praksa v okviru Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo, Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za Ruando ter Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča. Na tem področju smo bili priča izrednemu napredku, čeprav je bil časovni okvir, v katerem so bili sprejeti temeljni dokumenti in v katerem je nastajala sodna praksa, razmeroma kratek. Da bi razumeli, kako se je individualna kazenska odgovornost najvišjih političnih in vojaških predstavnikov razvijala, smo pogledali njeno ureditev skozi zgodovino ter opisali institucije, pred katere so najvišji politični in vojaški predstavniki lahko poklicani na odgovornost. Po predstavitvi temeljnih značilnosti individualne kazenske odgovornosti smo podrobneje pogledali njene modalitete in osvetlili še prihodnost ter probleme, s katerimi se mednarodni tribunali soočajo pri sojenju najvišjim političnim in vojaškim predstavnikom. Ugotovili smo, da kljub neizmernim napredkom ni mogoče reči, da vse poteka brez težav. Nekateri pravni instituti na področju individualne kazenske odgovornosti najvišjih političnih in vojaških predstavnikov so še vedno nejasni oziroma nedorečeni, kultura nekaznovanosti je še vedno prisotna, nenazadnje pa oviro predstavljajo tudi problemi pri sojenju, na primer oteženo dokazovanje najvišjim političnim in vojaškim predstavnikom ter vmešavanje držav in politike v delo sodišč.
Keywords:individualna kazenska odgovornost, mednarodno kazensko pravo, najvišji politični in vojaški predstavniki, modalitete individualne kazenske odgovornosti, kultura nekaznovanosti
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[T. Glazer]
Year of publishing:2014
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-46730 New window
UDC:341.46(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4800043 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:2VUF0JOH
Publication date in DKUM:17.12.2014
Views:1718
Downloads:236
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:THE EVOLUTION OF INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF SENIOR POLITICAL AND MILITARY REPRESENTATIVES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
Abstract:The foundations for the regime of individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives in international law were laid down after the Second World War with the adoption of Nurnberg and Tokyo Charters. Nevertheless, the legal concept of individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives was undoubtedly largely influenced by the case law, developed by the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and International Criminal Court. We witnessed remarkable evolution in this field, despite the relatively short time frame in which the basic documents were adopted and the case law was created. To understand how individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives evolved, we took a look at its regulation throughout history and described the institutions, before which senior political and military representatives can be called to answer. After we presented principal characteristics of individual criminal responsibility, we took a deeper look into various modes of liability and highlighted the future and problems that the tribunals are confronted with when they try senior political and military representatives. We cannot claim that there are no difficulties, regardless of the immense progress that was made in the field of individual criminal responsibility of senior political and military representatives. Hence, some legal concepts are still unclear or unresolved, culture of impunity is still very much present, and there are also other obstacles regarding trial problems, such as difficulties of providing evidence in cases against senior political and military representatives and interference of states and politics with the work of international tribunals.
Keywords:individual criminal responsibility, international criminal law, senior political and military representatives, modes of individual criminal responsibility, culture of impunity


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica