| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:UKINITEV ZEMLJIŠKEGA DOLGA
Authors:ID Miklič, Petra (Author)
ID Vrenčur, Renato (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Miklic_Petra_2015.pdf (741,35 KB)
MD5: 77C6EB58666BAA200F0473F2DE5473FD
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Stvarnopravni zakonik je 1.1.2003 po nemškem zgledu vnesel v slovenski pravni red novo obliko zavarovanja terjatev, kateri je pravna stroka zaradi številnih prednosti, kot sta neakcesornost in enostavna prenosljivost, napovedovala lep uspeh v praksi. Namen zemljiškega dolga je bil omogočanje hitrega, preprostega in učinkovitega stvarnopravnega zavarovanja. V nasprotju s pričakovanji pa zemljiški dolg ni bil dobro sprejet med uporabniki. Prvih osem let veljave zemljiškega dolga se je za njegovo uporabo odločilo le malo oseb, že leta 2012 pa ga je v zemljiško knjigo vpisalo skoraj toliko oseb kot v desetih letih veljavnosti zakona skupaj. Istočasno smo bili s strani organov pregona, pravnih strokovnjakov in novinarjev opozorjeni, da se je v zvezi z institutom zemljiškega dolga pojavljalo vedno več zlorab, kar je povzročalo med ljudmi veliko vznemirjanja. Zemljiški dolg naj bi se namreč začel množično uporabljati kot obrambni mehanizem pred odvzemom premoženja nezakonitega izvora na eni strani ter za preprečevanje poplačila terjatev upnikov in države na drugi strani. Tokrat je bila politika hitro odzivna na medijski nemir in ljudsko nezadovoljstvo in je zemljiški dolg, kljub nasprotovanju pravnih strokovnjakov, jeseni 2013 ukinila. Je bila ukinitev zemljiškega dolga res skrajno sredstvo za dosego določenega cilja? Podrobnejša analiza sledi v vsebinskem delu diplomskega dela.
Keywords:zemljiški dolg, prednosti zemljiškega dolga, zemljiški dolg kot obrambni mehanizem, zlorabe zemljiškega dolga, medijski nemir, ukinitev zemljiškega dolga.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[P. Miklič]
Year of publishing:2015
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-47428 New window
UDC:347.2(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4918059 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:DWBAQJSZ
Publication date in DKUM:06.07.2015
Views:2645
Downloads:416
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:CANCELLATION OF LAND DEBT
Abstract:The Slovenian property law inserted a new form of claim insurance in the Slovenian law order on 1 January 2003 following the German example. The legal profession predicted a success in practice because of a number of the code's advantages, as, for example, non-subordination and easy transferability. The purpose of the land debt was to enable a fast, simple and effective property insurance. On the contrary with the expectations, the land debt was not well accepted among the users. Only a few people decided to use this institute in the first eight years of its validity. This changed in 2012, when the number of people, who used the land debt, almost reached the total amount of the users in the previous ten years. At the same time the law enforcement officers, legal experts and the media alerted that there were more and more abuses connected to the land debt institute, which provoked a lot of excitement among the people. The land debt started to be used as a defence mechanism against the forfeiture of property of illegal origin on one side and as a prevention of repayment of creditors' and the state’s claims on the other side. The politics was very fast to respond to the media's turmoil and the people's dissatisfaction, so it cancelled the land debt in the fall of 2013 despite the opposition of legal experts. Was the cancellation of the land debt really the last mean to achieve a certain aim? A more detailed analysis follows in the narrative part of the thesis.
Keywords:land debt, advantages of land debt, land debt as defence mechanism, abuses of land debt, media turmoil, cancellation of land debt.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica