| Naslov: | Objektivizacija poškodb in posledic v strokovnih medicinskih mnenjih |
|---|
| Avtorji: | ID Vrabl, Miran (Avtor) |
| Datoteke: | http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DHEJJAPP
|
|---|
| Jezik: | Slovenski jezik |
|---|
| Vrsta gradiva: | Delo ni kategorizirano |
|---|
| Tipologija: | 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek |
|---|
| Organizacija: | FKBV - Fakulteta za kmetijstvo in biosistemske vede
|
|---|
| Opis: | Background Only unequivocal evidence confirming the total extent of injury. Biomechanical analysis, objectifications of permanent consequences after injury and objectification, whether such injuries influence life activities ofan injured person, should be the basics for preparation of expert medical opinion. To make a necessary distinction from the previous injuries or illnesses that might have influence on current health state of a patient and its treatment, analysis of all medical records of a certain injured person is needed. Therefore this are inevitable steps in preparation of an expert medical opinion. In cases when medical opinion should explain disability of a patient as a consequence of a certain contractual relationship, the contrctct should be taken into consideration when such opinions is prepared. Methods 500opinions have been retrospectively analysed, selected at random out of 3452 opinions, submitted in claims for damages at Zavarovalnica Maribor, d. d.,in the period from January 2001 until January 2006. Thirteen typical data have been analysed and evaluated on the basis of objective evidences. Results On the basis of analyses it hots been established that there is a great difference between principles of objectification and the data in analysed opinions. It has been noticed the most obvious deviation in biomechanical analysis (95%), in records of decreased life activities (90%), in all medical records of an injured person (65%) and in objectification of permanent consequences after injuries (55%). Conclusions As results of analysis demonstrate, there are significant differences in preparations of expert and medical opinions in Slovenia, particularly when basic principles are analysed that need to be considered when writing such opinions. (Abstract truncated at 2000 characters) |
|---|
| Ključne besede: | poškodbe, sodno medicinska izvedenska mnenja |
|---|
| Založnik: | Slovensko zdravniško društvo |
|---|
| Leto izida: | 2007 |
|---|
| Št. strani: | str. 217-222 |
|---|
| Številčenje: | Letn. 76, št. 4 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-52776  |
|---|
| UDK: | 340.66:616-001 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 2492972  |
|---|
| ISSN pri članku: | 1318-0347 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UM:DK:F9JYBYSE |
|---|
| Datum objave v DKUM: | 10.07.2015 |
|---|
| Število ogledov: | 946 |
|---|
| Število prenosov: | 61 |
|---|
| Metapodatki: |  |
|---|
| Področja: | Ostalo
|
|---|
|
:
|
Kopiraj citat |
|---|
| | | | Skupna ocena: | (0 glasov) |
|---|
| Vaša ocena: | Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom. |
|---|
| Objavi na: |  |
|---|
Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše
podrobnosti ali sproži prenos. |