| | SLO | ENG | Piškotki in zasebnost

Večja pisava | Manjša pisava

Izpis gradiva Pomoč

Naslov:Objektivizacija poškodb in posledic v strokovnih medicinskih mnenjih
Avtorji:ID Vrabl, Miran (Avtor)
Datoteke:URL http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DHEJJAPP
 
Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Vrsta gradiva:Delo ni kategorizirano
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FKBV - Fakulteta za kmetijstvo in biosistemske vede
Opis:Background Only unequivocal evidence confirming the total extent of injury. Biomechanical analysis, objectifications of permanent consequences after injury and objectification, whether such injuries influence life activities ofan injured person, should be the basics for preparation of expert medical opinion. To make a necessary distinction from the previous injuries or illnesses that might have influence on current health state of a patient and its treatment, analysis of all medical records of a certain injured person is needed. Therefore this are inevitable steps in preparation of an expert medical opinion. In cases when medical opinion should explain disability of a patient as a consequence of a certain contractual relationship, the contrctct should be taken into consideration when such opinions is prepared. Methods 500opinions have been retrospectively analysed, selected at random out of 3452 opinions, submitted in claims for damages at Zavarovalnica Maribor, d. d.,in the period from January 2001 until January 2006. Thirteen typical data have been analysed and evaluated on the basis of objective evidences. Results On the basis of analyses it hots been established that there is a great difference between principles of objectification and the data in analysed opinions. It has been noticed the most obvious deviation in biomechanical analysis (95%), in records of decreased life activities (90%), in all medical records of an injured person (65%) and in objectification of permanent consequences after injuries (55%). Conclusions As results of analysis demonstrate, there are significant differences in preparations of expert and medical opinions in Slovenia, particularly when basic principles are analysed that need to be considered when writing such opinions. (Abstract truncated at 2000 characters)
Ključne besede:poškodbe, sodno medicinska izvedenska mnenja
Založnik:Slovensko zdravniško društvo
Leto izida:2007
Št. strani:str. 217-222
Številčenje:Letn. 76, št. 4
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-52776 Novo okno
UDK:340.66:616-001
COBISS.SI-ID:2492972 Novo okno
ISSN pri članku:1318-0347
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:F9JYBYSE
Datum objave v DKUM:10.07.2015
Število ogledov:946
Število prenosov:61
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Področja:Ostalo
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Skupna ocena:(0 glasov)
Vaša ocena:Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom.
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share



Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Zdravniški vestnik. glasilo Slovenskega zdravniškega društva
Založnik:Slovensko zdravniško društvo
ISSN:1318-0347
COBISS.SI-ID:32893696 Novo okno

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Naslov:Objectification of injuries and consequences in expert medical opinions


Komentarji

Dodaj komentar

Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti.

Komentarji (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
Ni komentarjev!

Nazaj
Logotipi partnerjev Univerza v Mariboru Univerza v Ljubljani Univerza na Primorskem Univerza v Novi Gorici