| Title: | Objektivizacija poškodb in posledic v strokovnih medicinskih mnenjih |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Vrabl, Miran (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-DHEJJAPP
|
|---|
| Language: | Slovenian |
|---|
| Work type: | Not categorized |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Background Only unequivocal evidence confirming the total extent of injury. Biomechanical analysis, objectifications of permanent consequences after injury and objectification, whether such injuries influence life activities ofan injured person, should be the basics for preparation of expert medical opinion. To make a necessary distinction from the previous injuries or illnesses that might have influence on current health state of a patient and its treatment, analysis of all medical records of a certain injured person is needed. Therefore this are inevitable steps in preparation of an expert medical opinion. In cases when medical opinion should explain disability of a patient as a consequence of a certain contractual relationship, the contrctct should be taken into consideration when such opinions is prepared. Methods 500opinions have been retrospectively analysed, selected at random out of 3452 opinions, submitted in claims for damages at Zavarovalnica Maribor, d. d.,in the period from January 2001 until January 2006. Thirteen typical data have been analysed and evaluated on the basis of objective evidences. Results On the basis of analyses it hots been established that there is a great difference between principles of objectification and the data in analysed opinions. It has been noticed the most obvious deviation in biomechanical analysis (95%), in records of decreased life activities (90%), in all medical records of an injured person (65%) and in objectification of permanent consequences after injuries (55%). Conclusions As results of analysis demonstrate, there are significant differences in preparations of expert and medical opinions in Slovenia, particularly when basic principles are analysed that need to be considered when writing such opinions. (Abstract truncated at 2000 characters) |
|---|
| Keywords: | poškodbe, sodno medicinska izvedenska mnenja |
|---|
| Publisher: | Slovensko zdravniško društvo |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2007 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 217-222 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 76, št. 4 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-52776  |
|---|
| UDC: | 340.66:616-001 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1318-0347 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 2492972 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UM:DK:F9JYBYSE |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 10.07.2015 |
|---|
| Views: | 945 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 61 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
