| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Dokazni standardi v kazenskem postopku : diplomsko delo visokošolskega strokovnega študija Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Lavrinšek, Katja (Author)
ID Zgaga Markelj, Sabina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Lavrinsek_Katja_2015.pdf (673,27 KB)
MD5: 44BEDE892D01104FBAE605B0AD29E21E
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:V diplomski nalogi smo predstavili dokazne standarde v kazenskem postopku. Najprej smo se na kratko osredotočili na pomen kazenskega postopka, v nadaljevanju pa na dokazne standarde. Navedli smo kakšen kazenski postopek imamo v Sloveniji ter kakšne so značilnosti tega postopka. V nadaljevanju smo razložili pomen in vrste dokaznih standardov. Vsak dokazni standard smo razčlenili in navedli kdo ga praviloma izvaja, zakaj je pomemben ter kakšne so njegove značilnosti. Skozi diplomsko nalogo smo prav tako navedli stopnjo prepričanost preiskovalcev, da lahko uporabijo določen dokazni standard. V nadaljevanju smo največji poudarek namenili ukrepom, katere lahko preiskovalci uporabijo v času preiskave. Za vsak ukrep smo navedli tudi zakonska določila, katera veljajo v Slovenskem kazenskem postopku in so zapisana v Zakonu o kazenskem postopku (2014). V osrednjem delu smo navedli dva primere odločb, ki se navezujejo na uporaba dokaznih standardov. Navedli smo odobritveno pritožbo ter zavrnitveno. V sklopu diplomske naloge smo izvedli tudi anketo, ki se nanaša na poznavanje dokaznih standardov iz strani državljanov Republike Slovenije. V zadnjem delu diplomske naloge smo navedli rezultate ter ugotovitve ankete. Na podlagi postavljenih hipotez, katera so nas vodila pri pisanju diplomske naloge, smo ugotovili, da se dokazni standardi razlikujejo glede na fazo kazenskega postopka. Ter, da imajo sodišče, policija in tožilstvo razdeljeno delo glede na določen dokazni standard, in da preiskovalci ne kršijo človekove pravice s uporabo preiskovalnih ukrepov. Skozi celotno diplomsko nalogo smo ugotovili, da imajo dokazni standardi v času preiskave kaznivega dejanja zelo velik pomen, saj preko njih preiskovalci ne posežejo pretirano v človekove pravice obenem pa dajejo preiskovalcem stopnjo prepričanja, da je oseba storila kaznivo dejanje.
Keywords:kazensko pravo, kazenski postopek, dokazi, dokazni standardi, primeri, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:[Ljubljana
Place of performance:[Ljubljana
Publisher:K. Lavrinšek]
Year of publishing:2015
Year of performance:2015
Number of pages:47 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-54002 New window
UDC:343.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3023594 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:EWKEOENW
Publication date in DKUM:13.10.2015
Views:5609
Downloads:1404
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:STANDARDS OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Abstract:In our dissertation we represent standards of proof in criminal procedure. At first we write about criminal procedure and we continue with standards of proof. We write about what kind of criminal procedure we have in Slovenia and what features have this procedure. Than we explain importance of standards of proof and what kind of standards we know. We indicate who performed each standard, what is the meaning of it and some other features. We also indicate what kind degree of provide is necessary from each standards. In below we focus on measure that investigators can 7 apply during investigation. In Code of criminal procedure, are write all measure. In the middle of our dissertation we indicate two court decisions. First decisions court was dismissed and second approved. In the context we make questionnaire and we give it to citizen of Slovenia. We also make analysis of answers. On the base of hypotheses, which help us during our dissertation, we notice, that standards of proof are different depending on stage in criminal procedure. We also notice that court, police and prosecution have split their work on specified standards of proof and that investigators don't break the human rights if they used investigative measure. Through all dissertation we noticed, that standards of proof in criminal procedure have high importance. Investigations because of this don't intervene too much in human rights. And on the other side, standards give investigations degree of believes.
Keywords:standards of proof, criminal procedure, special method, investigations


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica