| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:OCENJEVANJE PRI POUKU KNJIŽEVNOSTI
Authors:ID Motaln, Maja (Author)
ID Pulko, Simona (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Motaln_Maja_2015.pdf (8,35 MB)
MD5: 1B972BB104AFF906557E6982444F4670
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Jasno je, da pri znanju ne moremo določiti enotne definicije, ki bi dodobra zajela vse pomembne vidike znanja, tudi ni »recepta« za najboljše znanje. Vsi podatki, tudi taki za katere menimo, da nam nikoli ne bodo prišli prav, kdaj pridejo prav. Ocenjevanje pri pouku književnosti ponuja učiteljem veliko možnosti za preverjanje in ocenjevanje, npr. ustno in pisno preverjanje ter pisanje spisov oziroma esejev. Zanimalo nas je, ali je učencem oziroma dijakom pri predmetu slovenščine bližje slovnica ali književnost. Res je, da so profesorji tisti, ki učijo učence oziroma dijake, vendar pa lahko tudi učenci veliko dajo profesorjem. Odločili smo se, da učence oziroma dijake povprašamo o tistem, kar oni pogrešajo pri pouku književnosti in kaj bi popravili, naredili boljše. Tako bomo dobili odgovore iz prve roke. Menimo, da bomo s pomočjo sledečega magistrskega dela dobili koristne napotke za pouk književnosti. Osredotočili smo se tudi na ocenjevanje pri pouku književnosti. Vemo namreč, da poznamo veliko oblik preverjanja in ocenjevanja znanja, vendar pa seveda niso vse pisane na kožo učencem in dijakom. Ljudje smo si različni in imamo različne sposobnosti. Zanimalo nas je, katera oblika preverjanja znanja se učencem in dijakom zdi najučinkovitejša in katera najmanj. S pomočjo ankete bomo preverili, kakšna je bralna pismenost učencev in dijakov, saj se vsi zavedamo, da učenci in dijaki premalo berejo. Tako bodo anketirani dobili možnost, da sami povedo, kaj bi radi brali in kakšne knjige so jim zanimive. Preverili bomo, katera dela berejo učenci oziroma dijaki.
Keywords:ocenjevanje, pouk književnosti, branje, bralna pismenost
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[M. Motaln]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-55313 New window
UDC:37.091.279.7:82(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:22406152 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:NPOHTWRG
Publication date in DKUM:08.08.2016
Views:2446
Downloads:325
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:LITERATURE CLASS EVALUATION
Abstract:We cannot lay down a unanimous definition of knowledge, which would thoroughly capture all the important aspects of it; there is also no “recipe” for the best knowledge. All data, including such for which we do not believe ever to use it, eventually comes into use. Assessment in teaching literature offers plenty opportunities for testing and evaluating to teachers, for example: oral and written testing, and writing compositions or essays. We were interested in whether the pupils or students are closer to grammar or literature of the Slovene course. It is true that the professors are the ones, who teach students, however, the students can also give plenty of knowledge back to them. We decided to inquire what the students miss in Slovene literature class, and what they would change or improve; so we get the answers first handed. We believe we would get useful guidance for teaching literature by writing this master’s thesis. We focused on the evaluation in the literature course. We know that there are many forms of examination and assessment of knowledge, but not all of them suit every student. Every person is unique and possesses different abilities. We wanted to discover, which form of examination students find the most effective, and which the least. We examined the reading literacy of student through our survey, as we are all aware of the lack of reading among students. Thus, respondents got the opportunity to say what they wish to read and which books they find interesting. We checked which works the students actually read.
Keywords:assessment, literature course, reading, reading literacy


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica