Quis custodiet ipsos custodes : zaščita človekovih pravic v postopku pred Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem

Zgaga Markelj, Sabina

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Quis custodiet ipsos custodes : zaščita človekovih pravic v postopku pred Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem
Authors:	ID Zgaga Markelj, Sabina (Author)
Files:	Zbornik_znanstvenih_razprav_2014_Zgaga_Quis_custodiet_ipsos_custodes_zascita_clovekovih_pravic_v_postopku_pred_Mednarodnim_kazenskim_sod.pdf (333,61 KB) MD5: 91749450C163832DA3FB5611B6A85595 http://www.pf.uni-lj.si/media/zzr2014_zgaga.pdf
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Scientific work
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:	Mednarodno kazensko pravo se je dolgo osredotočalo predvsem na zagotavljanje kazenske odgovornosti storilcev mednarodnih hudodelstev, a mora to zagotoviti tudi v okviru poštenega kazenskega postopka. V zvezi s tem se zastavlja vprašanje, ali za zagotavljanje zakonitosti postopka potrebujemo tudi zunanji nadzor. To je postalo relevantno predvsem z ustanovitvijo stalnega Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča. Prispevek preverja hipotezo, da Rimski statut pozna ustaljene možnosti uveljavljanja pravic obdolženca, da pa bi bil kljub temu potreben zunanji nadzor. Na začetku obravnava obstoječe možnosti uveljavljanja oziroma sankcioniranja kršitev človekovih pravic v postopku pred MKS; preko vlaganja pravnih sredstev, kazenske, civilne ali odškodninske odgovornosti ali izločitve nedopustnih dokazov. Drugi del prispevka pa vsebuje razmislek o vključitvi MKS v obstoječe univerzalne, regionalne ali nacionalne nadzorne mehanizme.
Keywords:	Rimski statut, izločitev nedopustnih dokazov, pravice obdolženca, procesna kršitev, kazenska odgovornost, odškodninska odgovornost, imuniteta, človekove pravice
Publication status:	Published
Publication version:	Version of Record
Year of publishing:	2014
Number of pages:	str. 153-180, 192-193
Numbering:	Letn. 74
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-55932
ISSN:	1854-3839
UDC:	341.4:341.645.2:342.7
ISSN on article:	1854-3839
COBISS.SI-ID:	14027089
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:SWNNZUPD
Publication date in DKUM:	21.12.2015
Views:	2575
Downloads:	752
Metadata:
Categories:	Misc.
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:	Zbornik znanstvenih razprav
Shortened title:	Zb. znan. razpr.
Publisher:	Pravna fakulteta
ISSN:	1854-3839
COBISS.SI-ID:	223437312

Licences

License:	CC BY-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
Description:	Under the NoDerivatives Creative Commons license one can take a work released under this license and re-distribute it, but it cannot be shared with others in adapted form, and credit must be provided to the author.
Licensing start date:	21.12.2015

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Quis custodiet ipsos custodes : protection of human rights at the International Criminal Court
Abstract:	International criminal law has been long focusing on providing criminal responsibility to perpetrators of international crimes and preventing their impunity, but it also has to provide fair trial at the same time. In connection to this an issue arises, whether the legality of the procedure has to be ensured by external supervision. That became especially relevant with the establishment of a permanent International Criminal Court (the ICC). This paper therefore tries to verify the hypothesis that the Rome Statute includes all the regular mechanisms for protection of the defendant´s rights, but the external supervision is still required. The paper firstly discussed the existing possibility of protection of the defendant´s rights in the ICC - means of invoking or sanctioning violations of these rights through legal remedies, criminal, civil and tort liability or inadmissibility of evidence. Second part of the paper includes thoughts on possibility of the ICC joining the existing universal, regional or national supervisory mechanisms.
Keywords:	Rome Statute, exclusion of inadmissible evidence, rights of the accused, procedural violation, criminal responsibility, tort liability, immunity, human rights

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back