| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Možnosti za uporabo posplošene tržne vrednosti nepremičnin
Authors:ID Pšunder, Igor (Author)
ID Tominc, Polona (Author)
Files:URL http://geodetski-vestnik.com/cms/images/57/4/gv57-4_psunder.pdf
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:Posplošena tržna vrednost nepremičnin, ki jo je Geodetska uprava Republike Slovenije leta 2010 izračunala za vse nepremičnine v Sloveniji in jo posredovala lastnikom, je v javnosti sprožila veliko polemik. Lastniki so popravili ali spremenili kar 1.153.909 podatkov, nezaupanje pa se je stopnjevalo tudi zaradi odziva medijev, ki so bili večinoma zelo kritični do posplošene tržne vrednosti. Po preteku obdobja, ko je bilo mogoče vnašati popravke in spremembe, se je utrdil vtis, da podatki o posplošeni tržni vrednosti izražajo zadovoljivo natančno oceno vrednosti nepremičnin. Posplošeno tržno vrednost so kot referenčni podatek o vrednosti nepremičnin za potrebe zavarovanega posojanja začele pri nepremičninah manjše vrednosti uporabljati celo banke. V strokovni javnosti se kljub temu porajajo pomisleki o primernosti uporabe posplošene tržne vrednosti za druge namene kot obdavčenje, saj pri tej vrednosti niso upoštevane specifične lastnosti nepremičnin (na primer razgled), poleg tega so podatki o posplošeni tržni vrednosti posredovani z zamikom in so lahko v spremenljivih tržnih razmerah nele zastareli, temveč celo zavajajoči. V prispevku je obravnavano dojemanje posplošene tržne vrednosti. Temelji na raziskavi, izvedeni med strokovnjaki inširšo javnostjo v Sloveniji. Kot kažejo rezultati, obe javnosti relativno dobro sprejemata posplošeno tržno vrednost, in v povprečju skoraj 60 % strokovne in širše javnosti meni, da bi lahko bila uporabna tudi za druge namene, ne le za obdavčenje.
Keywords:nepremičnine, vrednotenje, tržna vrednost, uporaba, Slovenija
Year of publishing:2013
Number of pages:str. 734-746, 747-759
Numbering:Letn. 57, št. 4
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-56268 New window
UDC:332.6(497.4)
ISSN on article:0351-0271
COBISS.SI-ID:11607836 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:BMIUM529
Publication date in DKUM:21.12.2015
Views:2266
Downloads:71
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Geodetski vestnik
Shortened title:Geod. vestn.
Publisher:Zveza geodetov Slovenije
ISSN:0351-0271
COBISS.SI-ID:5091842 New window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Potential usage of generalized real estate market value
Abstract:Generalized real estate market value was evaluated by the Surveying and Mapping Authority of the Republic of Slovenia in 2010. Evaluations were made for all real estate in Slovenia and communicated to the real estate owners; this caused much controversy. Later, owners corrected or changed 1,153,909 pieces of real estate data. The distrust of generalized real estate market value was intensified by the mediaʼs negative attitude towards it, expressed in the majority of articles. When the period for making changes and corrigenda expired, an impression was established of a satisfactory and precise valuation of real estate. Even the banks started using generalized real estate market value as referential information in smaller real estate transactions for the banksʼ mortgage lending needs. Nevertheless, the professional public has expressed concerns about the appropriateness of using generalized market value for purposes other than imposing taxes, since some specific characteristics of real estate (e.g. the view) are ignored. Furthermore, the information about generalized market value is conveyed with atime delay - it can thus be not only obsolete but also misleading in unstable market conditions. This article discusses perceptions of generalized market value. It is based on research that was conducted among professionals and the general public in Slovenia. The results show that professionals and the general public have adopted generalized market value relatively well. Furthermore, 60% of the professional public thinks that generalized market value could also be used for other purposes (not only for imposing taxes).


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica