| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:PRIMERJAVA EKONOMSKE UPRAVIČENOSTI GRADNJE MED HIŠO V PASIVNEM IN HIŠO V NIZKO ENERGIJSKEM STANDARDU NA OSNOVI PORABE RAZLIČNIH ENERGENTOV
Authors:ID Molnar, Sebastjan (Author)
ID Premrov, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Tominc, Polona (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Žegarac Leskovar, Vesna (Comentor)
Files:.pdf UN_Molnar_Sebastjan_2016.pdf (4,50 MB)
MD5: C71DC0CA40D67FB010AD28B90BC8FA32
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
Abstract:V diplomskem delu so opisane prednosti in slabosti lesene gradnje ter različni sistemi lesene montažne gradnje. Zajet je tudi opis uporabe stekla v gradnji. Predstavljeni so različni sistemi ogrevanja hiš in prezračevanja. Sledi analiza objekta samega, kjer je med drugim zajet tudi postopek, kako izbrati primerno toplotno črpalko za ogrevanje hiše. Opisane so smernice, ki jih moramo upoštevati, če želimo graditi nizkoenergijske, oziroma pasivne hiše. Nato so analizirani energenti, ki jih danes največ uporabljamo za ogrevanje hiš. Ker je narejena primerjava med nizkoenergijsko in pasivno hišo, so zajeti tudi stroški energetske nadgradnje ogrevalnega sistema, oken, izolacije hiše kot tudi primerjava same porabe energentov. Za izbiro ustreznih nadgradenj je bila v pomoč uporabljena programska oprema za načrtovanje in optimizacijo pasivnih in nizkoenergijskih hiš, PHPP 2007. Na koncu je narejena primerjava ekonomske upravičenosti nadgradnje nizkoenergijske na pasivno hišo. Z upoštevanje vseh investicij, kjer so zajete tudi subvencije Ekosklada, smo prišli do zaključka ali je smiselno nadgraditi nizkoenergijsko hišo ali ne. Za izračun ekonomske upravičenosti je bila uporabljena metoda neto sedanje vrednost
Keywords:lesena gradnja, ogrevanje, toplotna črpalka, energenti, ekonomska upravičenost
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[S. Molnar]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-57340 New window
UDC:[697.1:694.057]+657.478(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:19770134 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:K97HLIIE
Publication date in DKUM:11.04.2016
Views:1628
Downloads:196
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FG
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:THE COMPARISON OF THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN THE HOUSE IN PASSIVE AND THE HOUSE IN THE LOW ENERGY STANDARD ON THE BASIS OF THE CONSUMPTION OF DIFFERENT ENERGY PRODUCTS (ENERGENTS)
Abstract:The diploma paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of timber construction and various prefabricated timber construction systems. It also includes a description of how glass is used in construction. Moreover, we introduce different house heating and ventilation systems. This is followed by an analysis of the building itself which also involves the procedure on how to choose the appropriate heat pump for house heating. Furthermore, we provide guidelines that need to be considered in the construction of low-energy or passive houses. Next, we analyse the energy products which are most frequently used for heating. In the framework of the comparison between a low-energy house and a passive house we also indicate the costs of an energy upgrade of the heating appliances, windows and insulation, and the comparison of their respective energy product consumption. The energy upgrade option were analysed with a special software for the design and optimization of passive and low-energy buildings (PHPP 2007). Finally, we drew up a comparison in terms of the economic viability of upgrading a low-energy house to a passive house. By taking into account the total investments, and also considering the subsidies from the Slovenian Environmental Fund (Eko sklad), we were able to conclude, whether it is reasonable to upgrade a low-energy house. Economic viability was calculated based on the net present value method.
Keywords:Timber construction, heating, heat pump, energy products, economic viability


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica