| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:VARSTVO DOSTOJANSTVA JAVNEGA USLUŽBENCA PRI SLUŽBENEM OCENJEVANJU
Authors:ID Sajič, Andreja (Author)
ID Ovsenik, Marija (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Sajic_Andreja_2016.pdf (1013,76 KB)
MD5: 2C98B6711590261C2D9A1E05B505B718
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
Abstract:Ko govorimo o varstvu dostojanstva javnega uslužbenca pri službenem ocenjevanju v javni upravi mislimo na varstvo pred nadlegovanjem in mobingom – trpinčenjem na delu. Republika Slovenija je pričela zakonsko urejevati področje varovanja dostojanstva javnih uslužbencev in delavcev nasploh šele leta 2002. Za zagotavljanje varstva dostojanstva je zadolžen delodajalec v okviru svojih pravic in obveznosti. Izkušnje in sodna praksa kažejo, da prihaja do vse večjega kršenja dostojanstva in trpinčenja javnih uslužbencev s strani nadrejenega oz. delodajalca. Izvedena anketa potrjuje, da delodajalec ne opravlja svojih obveznosti obveščanja, saj zaposleni ne poznajo svojih pravic in niso seznanjeni s predpisi, ki varujejo dostojanstvo javnega uslužbenca na splošno in pri službenem ocenjevanju. Zaposleni v večini primerov ne upajo spregovoriti in poiskati ustrezne pomoči in zaščite. S pomočjo anketiranja smo poizkušali preveriti, ali zaposleni vedo, kdaj je kršeno njihovo dostojanstvo pri delu, ali poznajo predpise, ki urejajo varovanje dostojanstva na delu, ter kaj jih ovira, da ne prijavijo kršitve dostojanstva svetovalcu. V raziskovalnem delu smo predlagali postopek glede tega, kaj naj stori posameznik, ko mu sodelavec potoži, da njegov nadrejeni grobo krši njegovo dostojanstvo na delu. Prav tako smo predlagali, kako preprečiti nadaljnje kršenje dostojanstva zaposlenemu, še posebej, ko ima kršitelj vlogo in možnost službeno ocenjevati, kljub temu da je zaposleni prijavil kršenje dostojanstva na delu. Iz ugotovitev diplomskega dela izhaja, da sta potrebna zakonska ureditev in varstvo dostojanstva vseh javnih uslužbencev. Prispevek našega dela je v razmišljanju in predlogu, da bi moral vsako prijavo kršitve dostojanstva javnega uslužbenca reševati tudi neodvisen organ. Iz sodne prakse in izkušenj lahko sklepamo, da bo delodajalec naredil vse, da zadevo pomete pod preprogo. Delodajalec se mora zavedati dejstva, da je vsak vložek v varovanje dostojanstva javnih uslužbencev na delu naložba, ki je upravičena, smiselna in ne nazadnje tudi nujna.
Keywords:trpinčenje, mobing, kršitev dostojanstva, službeno ocenjevanje, prijava kršitve dostojanstva
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-57629 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:7573523 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:MGM7LGZT
Publication date in DKUM:12.05.2016
Views:1436
Downloads:130
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FOV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:PROTECTION OF THE DIGNITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THE OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT
Abstract:When we talk about security of dignity of public employees at job evaluation in the public sector, we see the problem as harassment and mobbing – maltreatment at work. In the Republic of Slovenia, the security of dignity of public employees and workers, in general, was not legally managed till the year 2002. Responsibility for the security of dignity of employees is on employer within his rights and duties. Experience and legal practice show, that there is more and more violation of the dignity of public employees by the employer. The survey shows that employer does not inform his employees about their rights, that protect the dignity of public employees at job evaluation. In most cases employees are afraid to talk and search for appropriate help and protection. To get information, if employees know when their dignity is being violated, if they know regulations, that protect their dignity at and what keeps them from reporting violations to the consultant, we did a survey. During research, instructions were given what individual should do if he/she finds out that coworkers rights are being violated by his/hers employer. It was also suggested how to prevent feeder violations of the dignity of employees, especially when the employer has the power to assess his/hers work, even though the employer is being reported to violate the dignity of the employee. From conclusions, we see that there is a need of law regulation and security of dignity of public employees. Our work contribution is shown in suggestion, that every violation of the dignity of public employees should be solved by an independent institution. Experience from law practice gives us a conclusion that employer will do everything to sweep the problem under the rug. The employer has to realize the fact, that every input for the security of dignitary of public employees at a job is an investment, which should be justified, meaningful, and none the last, urgent.
Keywords:bullying, mobbing, violation of dignity, performance evaluation, report of a violation of dignity


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica