EKSKLUZIJA DOKAZOV V NOVEJŠI SODNI PRAKSI REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE

Gabrič, Marko

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	EKSKLUZIJA DOKAZOV V NOVEJŠI SODNI PRAKSI REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE
Authors:	ID Gabrič, Marko (Author) ID Dežman, Zlatan (Mentor) More about this mentor... ID Šošić, Miha (Comentor)
Files:	MAG_Gabric_Marko_2016.pdf (753,97 KB) MD5: 8F2626EEA97F38595510E3EAAC88B344
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Master's thesis/paper
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Ekskluzija dokazov je institut, ki izvira iz anglosaškega akuzatornega sistema kazenskega postopka, razvilo pa ga je Vrhovno sodišče ZDA. Bistvo obravnavanega instituta je v tem, da prepreči, da bi se nezakonito ali protiustavno pridobljeni dokazi lahko uporabili v kazenskem postopku. Obstajata dva glavna teoretična pristopa k ekskluziji dokazov, in sicer utilitaristično pojmovanje in načelno oziroma dosledno pojmovanje. V Sloveniji je uzakonjena dosledna ekskluzija dokazov, kar pomeni, da je potrebno vsak dokaz, ki je bil pridobljen s kršitvijo človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin izločiti iz sodnega spisa, sodna odločba pa se nanj ne sme opreti. Vendar pa je slovenska sodna praksa prikazala odklon od te ureditve z uporabo metode tehtanja, in sicer s tehtanjem med kršeno ustavno pravico obdolženca in varovano pravico posameznika, ki je dokaz pridobil s posegom v pravico, ter tehtanje med prizadeto ustavno pravico obdolženca in javnim interesom za učinkovit pregon kaznivih dejanj, če je dokaze s posegom v pravico obdolženca pridobil državni organ. Poleg tega je sodna praksa pokazala odklon tudi z uporabo štirih izjem, ki jih je v zvezi z doktrino »sadežev zastrupljenega drevesa« izoblikovalo Vrhovno sodišče ZDA: izjema dobre vere, neizogibnega odkritja, neodvisnega vira in zbledelega madeža.
Keywords:	Ekskluzija dokazov, utilitarsitična doktrina, dosledna ekskluzija, odklon sodne prakse, tehtanje, izjeme po doktrini »sadežev zastrupljenega drevesa«
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[M. Gabrič]
Year of publishing:	2015
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-57646
UDC:	343(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5039147
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:1Z8O8XBP
Publication date in DKUM:	13.04.2016
Views:	3400
Downloads:	889
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE IN THE RECENT JUDICAL PRACTICE IN THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA
Abstract:	Exclusion of evidence is a legal concept that originates from the Anglo-Saxon accusatory system and was developed by the US Supreme Court. The essence of this legal concept is, that it prevents illegally or unconstitutionally obtained evidence to be used in criminal proceedings. There are two main theoretical approach to the exclusion of evidence; the utilitarian approach and the principle based or absolute approach. Slovenia has an absolute exclusionary rule by law, which means that it is necessary that any evidence that has been obtained with the violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms must be removed from the case file and the court decision must not be based on such evidence. Slovenian jurisprudence has shown deviation from this principle using two methods of weighing. First method uses weighing between the constitutional right of the accused that has been violated and the constitutional right of the person who obtained the evidence thrugh such violation. Second method uses weighing between constitutional right of the accused that has been violated and public interest for effective prosecution, if evidience were obtained from the state authority with the violation of the constitutional right of the accused. Moreover, the case law shows deviation with the use of the four exceptions that ware developed by US Supreme Court, namely the good faith doctrine, the inevitable discovery doctrine, the independent source doctrine and purged taint doctrine.
Keywords:	Exclusion of evidence, utilitarian approach, absolute approach, deviation from the slovenian judical practice, weighing, exceptions in relation to the "fruits of the poisonous tree" doctrine

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back