| Title: | Usefulness of the patient information leaflet (PIL) and information on medicines from professionals : a patient's view |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Poplas-Susič, Tonka (Author)
ID Klemenc-Ketiš, Zalika (Author)
ID Kersnik, Janko (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  Zdravniski_vestnik_2014_Poplas-SusiÄ,_Klemenc-Ketis,_Kersnik_Usefulness_of_the_patient_information_leaflet_(PIL)_and_information_on_med.pdf (91,61 KB)
MD5: 04B2D5759ADE04036D3C09A1BAD096B6
 http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1213
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Scientific work |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
|---|
| Organization: | MF - Faculty of Medicine
|
|---|
| Abstract: | Background: The Patient information leaflet (PIL) is an important source of information for every patient. Little is known about whether patients read the PIL and whether it contains useful information. Other sources of drug-related information are professionals (a family practitioner, a pharmacist and a nurse). Informing patients on drugs improves their compliance. The aim of the study was to identify the usefulness of PIL from the perspective of the patient, to assess professionals as a source of drug-related information and to suggest changes that can improve informing and therefore patients' compliances.
Methods: Four focus group interviews were conducted across different primary health care centres in the North East of Slovenia. Focus groups were composed of randomly selected patients (in total 20) who were willing to express their views on PILs, on other drug information sources and on possible improvements. A qualitative analysis of the data was based of the transcription of the audiotapes.
Results: Patients read the PILs selectively. They were most interested in side effects, contraindications and the purpose of the prescribed drug. Participants reported that the language in PILs is too scientific. In the case they do not understand PILs or they recognise some of the side effects, a majority of participants decide to contact a family physician first, and less frequently a pharmacist or a nurse. A family physician is considered to be the most trustworthy source of information and patients think that pharmacists could play a more active role in patients% education.
Conclusion: Current PILs offer enough partial information to patients but need some improvements in terms of better legibility and access to the most crucial information. PIL does not enable a comprehensive information with respect to patient%s health status. Most reliable source of information is considered to be a family practitioner. Pharmacists could play a more active role in the education of patients. |
|---|
| Keywords: | PIL, focus groups, medicines, family practitioner |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2014 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 368-375 |
|---|
| Numbering: | Letn. 83, št. 5 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/DKUM-58188  |
|---|
| ISSN: | 1318-0347 |
|---|
| UDC: | 615 |
|---|
| ISSN on article: | 1318-0347 |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 31476697 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UM:DK:SBJE8WKQ |
|---|
| Publication date in DKUM: | 10.05.2017 |
|---|
| Views: | 1772 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 96 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
| Categories: | Misc.
|
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
