| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Primerjalna analiza razlik v povezanosti dejavnikov družbenega in ekonomskega razvoja med različnimi homogenimi skupinami držav
Authors:ID Jelenko, Štefan (Author)
ID Kavkler, Alenka (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Jelenko_Stefan_2016.pdf (2,22 MB)
MD5: 1398E256ADD1A539DD86094803852711
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:Potreben pogoj za obstoj vsake razvite ali nerazvite družbe je, da morata biti v njej in z njo v harmoniji v funkciji tudi vladanje in ekonomija. Vendar so bili skozi vso človeško zgodovino prisotni kompleksni odnosi med vladanjem in ekonomijo. V daljni zgodovini je bila ekonomija običajno podrejena vladanju. Na primer Adam Smith in Schumpeter sta analizirala in opozarjala na ta splet okoliščin. V sodobnem času se je to razmerje spremenilo. Ekonomija poskuša prevladati vladanje. Na današnje razmerje med ekonomijo in družbo je poskušal opozoriti in jih teoretično podrobno analizirati na primer North (1990). Kot eno izmed možnosti za uravnavanje današnjega stanja je videl vzpostavljanje neosebnega sistema vladanja družbi in v neosebni tržni družbi izmenjave interesov, storitev in blaga na družbenem, političnem in ekonomskem področju. Toda kako to doseči v realni in vedno kompleksnejši družbi? Po Northu (1990) je edini način v vzajemni izmenjavi in usklajevanju interesov med vsemi dejavniki družbe, združenimi v interesne organizacije, interesne skupine, agencije, in med vsemi vejami oblasti. Za to je potrebna v družbi vnaprejšnja vzpostavitev sistema neosebne pravne države oziroma vladanja, ki omogoča vsem dejavnikom družbe v njihovem vsakdanjem življenju, pri njihovem delu in pri njihovih dejavnostih delovati v skladu z danimi družbenimi normami. Nekateri avtorji so poskušali ta teoretična izhodišča znanstveno preverjati z ekonometričnimi kvantitativnimi raziskavami. V zaključkih njihovih raziskav vsi poudarjajo nujnost prihodnjih poglobljenih raziskav. To je bila spodbuda tudi za našo raziskavo. Izhajamo iz fenomena, da v realnosti današnjega sveta obstajajo različno razvite družbe in različno razvite ekonomije. V razvitejših družbah je večja verjetnost obstoja razvitejših ekonomij. To teoretično izhodišče v naši raziskavi razvijemo v več hipotez o različnih povezavah med kvantitativnimi pokazatelji družbenega in gospodarskega razvoja v skupini bolj ali manj razvitih držav. Za kvantitativno preverjanje hipotetičnih povezav med kazalniki razvoja uporabimo metodi korelacije in parcialne korelacije. Avtorji ti metodi večkrat omenjajo, vendar ju ne uporabljajo. V naši raziskavi ju uporabimo. Pri izbiri empiričnih vzorcev za analizo avtorji običajno izberejo vzorec vseh držav na svetu, ki ga primerjalno analizirajo z manj razvitimi državami. V naši raziskavi smo za določitev empiričnih vzorcev za analizo razlik med skupinama bolj in manj razvitih držav uporabili metodo razvrščanja v skupine po Wardu. Z ekonometrično analizo vzorcev smo ugotovili kvantitativno pomembne razlike v povezanosti med posameznimi pokazatelji družbene in ekonomske razvitosti med bolj in manj razvito skupino držav. Pri skupini razvitejših držav smo uspeli statistično značilno identificirati povezanost razvitosti ekonomije s tremi stebri razvitosti družbe, kot so učinkovitost zakonodajne veje oblasti, učinkovitost sodne veje oblasti in učinkovitost omejevanja korupcije v družbi. Pri manj razviti skupini držav smo uspeli statistično značilno identificirati samo povezavo med učinkovitostjo izvršne veje oblasti oziroma med vladami v širšem pomenu besede in ekonomsko razvitostjo. Vendar ekonomska razvitost skupine manj razvitih držav, merjena z BDP per capita pa je v povprečju za 32-odstotkov nižja od tiste v skupini razvitejših držav.
Keywords:ekonomska razvitost, družbena razvitost, glasnost in odgovornost, politična stabilnost, zakonodaja, zakonodajna oblast, vlada, izvršna oblast, sodstvo, sodna oblast, omejevanje korupcije
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[Š. Jelenko]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-58661 New window
UDC:330.34
COBISS.SI-ID:12643612 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:NRW68PLW
Publication date in DKUM:09.12.2016
Views:1576
Downloads:155
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:EPF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparative analysis of differences in the connection of factors of social and economic development between different homogeneous groups of countries
Abstract:The necessary conditions for existence of every society, developed or undeveloped, are functional governance and economics. However, complex relations between the two have been present throughout human history. Economics was subordinate to governance. For example, Adam Smith and Schumpeter have analysed and warned about this problem. In modern times this relationship has changed. Economy has prevailed over governance. This relationship between society and economy was analysed by North (1990). He saw the establishment of a non-personal system of governance and non-personal marketing society of exchanging interests, goods and services in the social, political and economic field as one of the options to control the present situation. But how to achieve this in the real and increasingly complex society. North advocates the mutual exchange and coordination of interests between all actors of society, united in interest groups, organizations, and agencies and all branches of the government as the only way. This is possible with the establishment of a system of non-personal rule of law that enables all members of society act in accordance with social norms in their everyday life, work and activities. Some researchers were trying to prove these theories with scientific econometric empirical studies. They all stressed that further and in-depth research is necessary in this area. This was the impetus for our study. We were starting from the fact that differently developed societies and differently developed economies exist in the world today. More developed economy is more likely to be present in more advanced societies. We developed this theoretical starting point of the research in several hypothetical links between empirical indicators of social and economic development in the groups of more or less developed countries. For the empirical verification of hypothetical links between indicators of development we used the method of correlation and partial correlation. Past researchers mentioned these methods several times but did not use them. We used these methods in our research. In the selection of empirical samples for analysis researchers usually choose a sample of all the countries of the world and compare it with less developed countries. In our research we used Ward’s method of clustering to determine empirical samples for the analysis of the differences between the more and less developed countries. With econometric analysis we have found statistically significant differences in the connection between the individual indicators of social and economic development between the groups of more and less developed countries. In the group of more developed countries we were able to empirically identify the important connection of economic development with the three pillars of social development, which are the effectiveness of the legislative branch of authority, the effectiveness of the judicial branch of authority, and the effectiveness of the restriction of corruption in society. In the group of less developed countries we were able to identify only the connection between the executive branch of authority or governments in the broader sense of the word and the economic development. But the economic development in the group of less developed countries is on average for 32-percent lower than in the group of more developed countries.
Keywords:economic development, social development, voice and accountability, political stability, legislative power, governance effectiveness, executive authority, regulatory quality, judicial power, rule of law, control of corruption.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica