| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:UGOTAVLJANJE PRIMERNOSTI DOLOČANJA VLAGE V TRDNIH ODPADKIH Z NESTANDARDIZIRANO IN STANDARDIZIRANO METODO
Authors:ID Edelbaher, Nuša (Author)
ID Samec, Niko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Kokalj, Filip (Comentor)
ID Brumec, Vilijana (Comentor)
Files:.pdf UN_Edelbaher_Nusa_2017.pdf (1,81 MB)
MD5: 43CECAD38D36E3BD5587388684D413C3
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Abstract:V diplomskem delu smo ugotavljali, katera metoda določanja vlage v trdnih odpadkih je boljša, ali je to standardna metoda ali hitra metoda. Pri standardni metodi smo uporabljali sušilnik – suhi stabilizator serije EASY, za hitro metodo smo uporabljali merilno napravo EMCO AP 500 – M3. Za obe metodi določanja vlage smo uporabljali 5 različnih vzorcev po 3 paralelke. Pri obeh metodah smo meritve izvajali na dveh materialih, to je karton in SRF. Za SRF smo želeli tudi glede na dobljene izračune določiti merilno območje. Po dobljenih rezultatih smo lahko izračune primerjali in ugotovili, katera metoda je boljša.
Keywords:karton, SRF, vzorec, vzorčenje, meritve, vsebnost vlage, trdni odpadki
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[N. Edelbaher]
Year of publishing:2017
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-61838 New window
UDC:628.474.3:62-913(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:20578838 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:P6VJKSTU
Publication date in DKUM:06.04.2017
Views:1681
Downloads:124
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FS
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The comparison of various procedures for determening water content in solid waste
Abstract:In our diploma work, we tried to determine whether moisture content of solid waste is best determined by the standard or by the quick method. For the standard method, we used a dryer – an EASY series dry stabilizer –, and for the quick method, we used the EMCO AP 500 – M3 measurement device. For both methods of determining the moisture content, we used 5 different samples with 3 test portions each. For both methods, measurements were taken from two materials, i.e. cardboard and SRF. In the case of SRF, we also wanted to use the results to determine the measurement range. After we got the results, we were able to compare calculations and determine which method worked best.
Keywords:carton, SRF, sample, sampling, moisture content, solid waste


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica