Izključitvena tožba - razmerje do drugih podobnih tožb

Piršič, Katja

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Izključitvena tožba - razmerje do drugih podobnih tožb
Authors:	ID Piršič, Katja (Author) ID Vrenčur, Renato (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UN_Pirsic_Katja_2016.pdf (385,01 KB) MD5: 107983A08230AC5B8A027F58BB735FB5
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Čut do sočloveka bi praviloma moral voditi v razumevanje in spoštovanje vseh oseb v naši bližnji okolici, ne glede na dandanašnjo multikulturno diverziteto. Vendar temu ni tako. Omenjena negativnost se velikokrat izkaže za resnično v medsosedskih odnosih, v katerih sosedje prek (sprva) bagatelnih ravnanj skušajo uveljaviti svojo voljo, ko pa temu ni tako, svoja ravnanja stopnjujejo. To je še posebej moteče v bližnjih življenjskih skupnostih, na primer v stanovanjskih blokih pod režimom etažne lastnine, kjer zaradi množice različnih dejavnikov (bližine stanovanjskih enot, deljenja uporabe skupnih delov stavbe, nenehne bližine sostanovalcev, delne izgube zasebnosti) praviloma prevladujejo strožja pravila kot v tipičnih ruralnih predelih Republike Slovenije. Eno izmed teh omogoča vložitev izključitvene tožbe, s katero je mogoče etažnemu lastniku zaradi njegovega prekomerno nadutega odnosa odvzeti lastninsko pravico, ki jo ima na posameznem delu izoblikovanega etažnega režima. Diplomsko delo se uvodoma dotakne razvoja etažne lastnine vse do njene današnje forme, nato pa poglobljeno razčleni zakonsko besedilo instituta izključitvene tožbe. V diplomski nalogi je tako pojasnjeno, kaj sploh izključitvena tožba je, kdaj in zoper koga jo je mogoče vložiti ter katere procesne in materialne predpostavke, ki jih zakon zgolj abstraktno navaja, s pomočjo sodne prakse in pridobljenih internih stanovanjskih aktov pa jih diplomsko delo konkretizira, morajo biti izpolnjene za njeno vložitev. Diplomsko delo v luči jurisprudence obravnava tudi vprašanje vložitve izključitvene tožbe v primeru dejanske etažne lastnine in procesne sposobnosti skupnosti etažnih lastnikov kot aktivno legitimirane stranke pravdnega postopka. V zvezi z obravnavanim institutom izključitvene tožbe je opravljena tudi primerjalno-pravna raziskava. Osrednji del vsebine diplomskega dela skuša odgovoriti na vprašanje, ali je izključitvena tožba zaradi posega v pravico do zasebne lastnine ukrep, sorazmeren zasledovanemu cilju. Iz tega razloga so argumentirani posamezni elementi testa legitimnosti in sorazmernosti (dopustnost, nujnost, primernost in sorazmernost v ožjem pomenu besede), v okviru nujnosti pa je ob zasledovanju podnaslova dela izvedena tudi primerjava izključitvene tožbe z drugimi ukrepi, kot so tožba zaradi motenja posesti, negatorna tožba, zahtevek za odstranitev škodne nevarnosti, odškodninski zahtevek in izterjava sredstev rezervnega sklada. Proti koncu diplomskega dela je predstavljen še pravilno izoblikovan tožbeni predlog in postopek prodaje nepremičnine v izvršbi, zaključek pa je namenjen grobemu orisu ugotovitev.
Keywords:	Medsosedski odnosi, etažna lastnina, dejanska etažna lastnina, legitimacija, izključitvena tožba, ultima ratio ukrep, tožba zaradi motenja posesti, negatorna tožba, zahtevek za odstranitev škodne nevarnosti, odškodninski zahtevek, izterjava sredstev rezervnega sklada.
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[K. Piršič]
Year of publishing:	2016
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-62032
UDC:	347.447.52(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5346859
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:RZ5RNDU3
Publication date in DKUM:	19.09.2016
Views:	1736
Downloads:	336
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Action for exclusio of real estate owner- relation to other similar lawsuits
Abstract:	Sympathy towards other people should normally lead to understanding and respect for all people in our surroundings, regardless of the present multicultural diversity. However, this is not so. This negativity often turns out to be true in neighbourhood relations, in which neighbours through (initial) trifle practices try to impose their will and escalate their actions when they are not satisfied. This is particularly disturbing in the nearby living communities, for example in blocks of flats under the regime of condominiums, where due to a multitude of factors (proximity of residential units, shared use of common parts of buildings, constant proximity of housemates, partial loss of privacy) stricter rules are applied than in typical rural areas of the Republic of Slovenia. One of these rules allows the submission of the application for exclusion of condominium owner, with which his right to property over a specific flat in the condominium is taken away from him due to his excessively arrogant attitude. The thesis initially touches the development of condominiums up to its present form, and then analyses the legal text of the exclusionary action. Through the jurisprudence and obtained internal housing acts, the content of the thesis is mostly focused on what an exclusionary action is, when and against whom it may be submitted and which procedural and substantive assumptions the law abstractly provides for its lodging. In the light of the jurisprudence the thesis also addresses the issue of filing the application for exclusion in the case of actual condominiums and legal capability of the condominium community as an actively legitimized party in civil proceedings. In relation to the exclusionary action, the thesis also carries out comparative legal research, but the central part of its content tries to answer the question whether the exclusionary action interference with the right to private property is proportionate to the objective aim. For this reason, the individual elements of the legitimacy and proportionality tests (admissibility, necessity, appropriateness and strict proportionality) are articulated. In the context of necessity, the sub-title of the thesis is presented by a comparison between exclusionary action and other measures, such as trespass action, actio negatoria, request to remove the danger of damage, claim for damages and the recovery of the reserve fund. Towards the end of the thesis, the properly configured claim and the process of selling a property in enforcement is presented, while the conclusion contains a rough outline of the thesis findings.
Keywords:	neighbourhood relations, condominium, de facto condominium, legitimation, exclusionary action, ultima ratio measure, trespass action, actio negatoria, request to remove the danger of damage, the claim for damages, recovery of the reserve fund.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back