INSTITUT GARANCIJE ZA BREZHIBNO DELOVANJE STVARI V SODNI PRAKSI

Mirkac, Primož

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	INSTITUT GARANCIJE ZA BREZHIBNO DELOVANJE STVARI V SODNI PRAKSI
Authors:	ID Mirkac, Primož (Author) ID Kranjc, Vesna (Mentor) More about this mentor... ID Prostor, Jerneja (Comentor)
Files:	UN_Mirkac_Primoz_2016.pdf (334,87 KB) MD5: 3F7CA4281481D66393A9464D9C1FA0DF
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	Diplomsko delo obravnava institut garancije za brezhibno delovanje stvari pri čemer se osredotoča na uveljavljanje garancijskih zahtevkov v sodni praksi. Institut garancije kupcu omogoča, da se v primeru okvare stvari znotraj garancijskega roka obrne na proizvajalca ali prodajalca, ki mora napako odpraviti oz. stvar zamenjati z novo, v kolikor to ni mogoče pa lahko alternativno uveljavlja ali znižanje kupnine ali odstop od pogodbe, pri čemer zaradi zakonsko določenega vrstnega reda kupec ne more prosto izbirati med zahtevki. Analiza sodne prakse pokaže, da je uspešnost uveljavljanja garancijskih zahtevkov odvisna od narave napake, saj sodišče presoja predvsem vpliv napake na funkcionalnost celotne stvari ter negativne posledice, ki bi lahko nastale na sami stvari zaradi nadaljnje uporabe. Pri tem je pomembno, da napaka oz. okvara stvari izhaja iz lastnosti stvari same, saj kupec, čigar stvar se je pokvarila zaradi napačne uporabe ali vzdrževanja ni upravičen do garancijskega zahtevka. Kot pomembno pri uspešnosti uveljavljanja zahtevkov iz garancije se izkaže tudi kupčevo pravočasno (torej v garancijskem roku) in primerno grajanje, ki se v smislu dokazovanja izkaže predvsem v pisni obliki. V okviru prostovoljne garancije na kvaliteto stvari pa je uspešnost uveljavljanja zahtevka iz garancije v precejšnji meri odvisna od garancijskih zagotovil garanta, ki lahko prostovoljno razširi jamstvo tudi za manjše napake, s čimer upravičencu nudi širše jamstvo. Garancijski upravičenec ima sodno varstvo tudi v primeru stečaja garanta, kjer se njegov garancijski zahtevek po samem zakonu pretvori v denarno terjatev, v stečajnem postopku se poplača sočasno in sorazmerno z ostalimi navadnimi upniki.
Keywords:	Garancija za brezhibno delovanje stvari, obvezna garancija, prostovoljna garancija, napaka, garancijski zahtevek, garancija kvalitete, stečaj, Obligacijski zakonik, Zakon o varstvu potrošnikov
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[P. Mirkac]
Year of publishing:	2016
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-62871
UDC:	347.4/.5:69(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	5314603
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:QGJUOUZV
Publication date in DKUM:	23.09.2016
Views:	2173
Downloads:	231
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	GUARANTEE FOR PROPER FUNCTIONING OF THE GOODS SOLD IN JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Abstract:	This Thesis deals with the institute of guarantee for the proper functioning of the goods sold, focusing on the enforcement of warranty claims in the judicial decisions. Institute warranty allows the customer, in case of a breakdown within the warranty period, to contact the manufacturer or retailer, which must rectify the fault or replace the item with a new one. If that is not possible the buyer may alternatively request a reduction in price or reject the contract. According to the legally stipulated order, the buyer is not free to choose between claims. The analysis of the judicial decisions shows that the performance of any warranty claims depends on the nature of the fault; the Court mainly assesses the impact of the faults on the functionality of the entire item and the negative consequences that could arise due to further use. It is important that an error or breakdown is a technical fault, as the consumer, whose item is ruined due to misuse or wrong maintenance is not entitled to a warranty claim. Any claim arising from the guarantee must be carried out within a timely manner during the warranty period and appropriate proof must be presented, such as in writing. In the context of voluntary guarantee, the guality of the item is important. The effectiveness of a claim from a guarantee to a large extent depends on the warranty guarantor, which can be voluntarily extended for a minor fault, making the recipient provide a longer guarantee. Warranty beneficiary has legal protection in the event of insolvency of the guarantor where its warranty claims, subject to law, can be converted into monetary claim. In the bankruptcy proceeding is the buyer paid simultaneosly and proportionate to the other ordinary creditors.
Keywords:	Guarantee for proper functioning of the goods sold, mandatory guarantee, voluntary guarantee, fault, warranty claim, guarantee of quality, insolvency, Code of Obligations, Consumer Protection Act

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back