| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Prost pretok blaga po odločbi sodišča EU v zadevi Ålands Vindkraft
Authors:ID Rogan, Sabina (Author)
ID Hojnik, Janja (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Rogan_Sabina_2016.pdf (306,21 KB)
MD5: 44B406F825438A09CD0B23FFCCEE7B84
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Zagotoviti prost pretok blaga med državami članicami brez ovir je temeljno načelo Evropske unije. Prost pretok blaga zajema tudi prost pretok električne energije, kljub temu, da bi marsikdo najverjetneje podvomil v elektriko kot pojem blaga. Sodišče EU je v sodni praksi potrdilo, da je elektrika blago. Posledično to pomeni tudi, da so ukrepi, ki omejujejo električno energijo, zajeti v obseg členov Pogodbe o delovanju EU, ki urejajo prost pretok blaga in prepovedujejo kakršnekoli ukrepi, ki bi to preprečevali. Poleg zagotovitve prostega pretoka blaga, je tudi vzpostavitev skupnega energetskega trga eden izmed najpomembnejših ciljev Evropske unije, EU pa si za vzpostavitev omenjenega trga prizadeva znotraj energetske politike EU. V okviru energetske politike si EU poleg tega, da si prizadeva vzpostaviti skupni energetski trg, prizadeva tudi spodbujati uporabo obnovljivih virov energije, kar je posledica vedno večje zavesti o pomembnosti varstva okolja in nevarnosti podnebnih sprememb. Obnovljivi viri energije so danes eden izmed najpomembnejših elementov za doseganje enega izmed v sodobnem času najpomembnejšega cilja EU, tj. varstva okolja in preprečevanja podnebnih sprememb. Kljub prizadevanjem EU za skupni energetski trg, pa ta cilj ostaja še naprej le cilj, ki ga je potrebno doseči v prihodnosti. Tudi sama zakonodaja EU, predvsem Direktiva 2009/28/ES o spodbujanju uporabe obnovljivih virov energije, ki je trenutno eden izmed najpomembnejših aktov na tem področju, upočasnjuje doseganje tega cilja. Direktiva namreč dopušča državam članicam ukrepe, ki omejujejo prost pretok električne energije, pri čemer pa se postavlja vprašanje skladnosti sekundarne zakonodaje s primarno zakonodajo EU. Družba Ålands Vindkraft je finski proizvajalec električne energije in je zaprosila za dodelitev zelenih certifikatov za proizvajanje električne energije iz obnovljivih virov na Švedskem. Švedski nacionalni program podpore, ki določa dodelitev zelenih certifikatov za proizvajanje elektrike iz obnovljivih virov, pridržuje upravičenost do dodelitve zelenih certifikatov za družbe, ki proizvajajo električno energijo iz obnovljivih virov, ki se nahajajo na švedskem ozemlju. Družba Ålands Vindkraft je vložila tožbo pri Upravnem sodišču v Linköpingenu zoper švedsko agencijo za energijo Energimyndigheten, pri čemer je trdila, da švedsko pravo s tem, ko pridržuje dodelitev zelenih certifikatov le za domače proizvajalce električne energije iz obnovljivih virov, krši člen 34 PDEU in da tak ukrep ne more biti opravičen na podlagi varstva okolja. Upravno sodišče je kasneje postavilo tri ključna predhodna vprašanja Sodišču EU. Sodišče EU je v sodbi sicer ugotovilo, da nacionalni program podpore Švedske za spodbujanje nacionalne proizvodnje zelene električne energije, ki je v skladu z Direktivo 2009/28/ES, da gre za ukrep z enakim učinkom, kot ga imajo količinske omejitve, vendar pa je poudarilo, da je ukrep opravičen iz razloga varstva okolja. Sodišče EU je torej neposredno diskriminatoren ukrep opravičilo na podlagi obvezne zahteve in ne na podlagi 36 PDEU.
Keywords:Prost pretok blaga, notranji trg, Evropska Unija, zadeva Ålands Vindkraft nacionalni programi podpore za dodelitev zelenih certifikatov, pridobivanje energije iz obnovljivih virov, ukrepi z enakim učinkom kot količinske omejitve, zavrnitev dodelitve zelenih certifikatov za proizvodne naprave izven ozemlja zadevne države članice.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[S. Rogan]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-62904 New window
UDC:339.923(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5343275 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:2L3JIZZO
Publication date in DKUM:09.03.2017
Views:3742
Downloads:150
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS ACCORDING TO THE DECISION OF THE ECJ IN CASE ALANDS VINDKRAFT
Abstract:To ensure the free movement of goods between Member States without barriers is a fundamental principle of the European Union. Free movement of goods also includes the free movement of electricity, despite the fact that many people probably questioned the concept of electricity as goods. EU Court's case-law confirmed that the electricity commodity. Consequently, this also means that the measures restricting electricity included in the scope of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, governing the free movement of goods and prohibiting any action that would prevent this. In addition to ensuring the free movement of goods, is the establishment of a common energy market is one of the most important objectives of the European Union, while the European Union to establish that market efforts within the EU energy policy. In the context of energy policy, the EU, in addition to seeking to establish a common energy market, is also working to promote the use of renewable energy sources as a result of the increasing awareness of the importance of environmental protection and the dangers of climate change. Renewable energy sources are today one of the most important elements for achieving one of the most important in modern times the EU target, ie. environmental protection and combating climate change. Despite the efforts of the EU common energy market, but this goal remains a goal that has to be reached in the future. Herself EU legislation, in particular Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of renewable energy sources, which is currently one of the most important instruments in this field, slowing down the achievement of this objective. The Directive does allow the Member States measures that restrict the free movement of electricity, while the question of compliance of secondary legislation with EU primary law. The company Ålands Vindkraft is a Finnish electricity generator and has applied for a green certificates for electricity generation from renewable sources in Sweden. Swedish national support scheme, which provides for the granting of green certificates for the production of electricity from renewable sources, reserves eligibility for the grant of green certificates to companies that produce electricity from renewable sources, which are located on Swedish territory. The company Ålands Vindkraft has filed a lawsuit with the Administrative Court in Linköpingen against the Swedish Energy Agency Energimyndigheten, arguing that Swedish law in that it reserves the granting of green certificates only to domestic producers of electricity from renewable sources, in breach of Article 34 TFEU and that such a measure can not be justified on the basis of environmental protection. The Administrative Court subsequently raised three key preliminary issues to the CJEU. CJEU in its judgment admittedly concluded that the national support program of Sweden to promote national production of green electricity, which is in accordance with Directive 2009/28/EC, it is a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction, but It pointed out that the measure is justified on the ground of environmental protection. CJEU is thus directly discriminatory measure apology on the basis of mandatory requirements and not on the basis of 36 TFEU.
Keywords:Free movement of goods, Internal Market, European Union, Ålands Vindkraft case, Directive 2009/28 / EC, national support schemes for the granting of green certificates, the production of energy from renewable sources, measures having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction, environmental protection, refusal allocation of green certificates for production facilities outside the territory of the Member State concerned.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica