| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:USTAVNO-PRAVNA DILEMA IZOLACIJE/KARANTENE BOLNIKOV Z NALEZLJIVIMI BOLEZNIMI
Authors:ID Voda, Marjetka (Author)
ID Toplak, Jurij (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Voda_Marjetka_2016.pdf (1,05 MB)
MD5: 1060E077F07958C6FFE80846D760DE8D
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V diplomskem delu se prepletata na eni strani kršitev osebnostnih pravic na področju zakonodaje o preprečevanju nalezljivih bolezni in na drugi strani nujnost in primernost ukrepov za preprečevanje nalezljivih bolezni, kot sta ukrepa izolacije in karantene, ki sta potrebna zaradi preprečevanja nalezljivih bolezni večjih razsežnosti, ki nevarno ogrožajo zdravje prebivalcev. Zaradi boljšega razumevanja tematik sem na samem začetku diplomskega dela predstavila ukrepe za preprečevanje nalezljivih bolezni, kjer sem se osredotočila na ukrepa izolacije in karantene, ter opisala probleme in izzive, s katerimi se srečuje današnja družba ob uvedbi le-teh. Predstavila sem pravne akte, ki urejajo področje nalezljivih bolezni v Sloveniji. V tem poglavju sem tudi na kratko predstavila Sklep št. 1082/2013/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, na ravni Evropske Unije in Mednarodni zdravstveni pravilnik Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije. Jedro naloge predstavlja poglavje Izolacija in karantena - pravno in etično sporna ukrepa, kjer sem opozorila na kontradiktornost med Ustavo Republike Slovenije (32.čl. (svoboda gibanja), 51.čl. (pravica do zdravstvenega varstva), 19.čl. (varstvo osebne svobode) in 25.čl. (pravica do sodnega varstva)), ter Zakonom o nalezljivih boleznih (18. čl.(izolacija) in 19. čl. (karantena)), v katerem zakonodajalec s posebnimi, prisilnimi ukrepi ščiti javni interes in posega v pravice posameznika. Tu sem predstavila mnenja tujih avtorjev in odločitev ESČP – primer Enhorn proti Švedski. Na koncu sem predstavila regulatorne organe Republike Slovenije, ki so namenjeni varovanju zdravja, opisala njihove naloge in področja dela. V diplomskem delu sem ugotovila, da sta ukrepa izolacije in karantene, kot ukrepa za preprečevanje širjenja nalezljivih bolezni, ki so nevarne za javno zdravje, nujna in primerna ob upoštevanju strogega testa sorazmernosti.
Keywords:Izolacija, karantena, človekove pravice, varstvo osebne svobode, svoboda gibanja, pravno varstvo.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[M. Voda]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-63151 New window
UDC:342(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5311531 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:4YOPNUIP
Publication date in DKUM:20.09.2016
Views:1777
Downloads:269
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:CONSTITUTIONAL DILLEMAS OF PATIENT ISOLATION IN CASE OF CONTIGUOUS DISEASES
Abstract:In the thesis, the two aspects are intertwined, namely an infringement of personality rights with regard to the Legislation on Communicable diseases on the one hand and the need and adequacy of measures to prevent the introduction of communicable diseases, such as the measures of an isolation and a quarantine, which are necessary for the purposes of prevention of communicable diseases on an unusually large scale as they may present a serious threat to the health of the population. In view of better understanding of the issue, I first presented the measures to prevent the introduction of communicable diseases, where I focused on the measures of isolation and quarantine, and described the problems and challenges, which today's society is facing with the introduction of the mentioned measures. I presented the legal acts regulating the area of communicable diseases in Slovenia. In this chapter, I also briefly presented the Decision No. 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and the European Council at the European Union level, and International Health Regulations. The core element of the thesis is the chapter named Isolation and quarantine – the legally and ethically questionable measures, where I pointed out the adversarial nature between the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia (Article 32 (Freedom of Movement), Article 51 (Right to Health Care), Article 19 (Protection of Personal Liberty) and Article 25 (Right to Justice)) and the Contagious Diseases Act (Article 18 (Isolation) and Article 19 (Quarantine)), in which the legislator with the specific coercive measures protects the public interest and interferes with the right to respect the private life of individuals. Here I presented the opinions of the foreign authors and the ECHR decision on the case of Enhorn against Sweden. At the end I introduced the regulatory authorities of the Republic of Slovenia, which are intended to protect the health; I described their tasks and areas of work. In the thesis, I found that as the measures to prevent the spread of communicable diseases presenting a risk to the public health, the measures of isolation and quarantine are necessary and appropriate, taking into account the strict proportionality test.
Keywords:Isolation, quarantine, human rights, protection of personal liberty, freedom of movement, legal protection.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica